Here's the article that dipshit (AngryBarber) got the Romans quote from.
ARTICLE
What I find funny about that is that a lot of the stuff I was saying about Dullahan BEFORE the Derby is in there.
I said that his first two races on dirt were sprints, which is not his game, and that he could have been a very "green" horse at the time which Romans pretty much confirms was the case.
“I thought we had a talented horse that wanted to stretch out,” trainer Dale Romans said. “I just wanted to get a good race into him that day.”
I also said before the Derby to look at how well Dullahan had worked on dirt at Gulfstream and Churchill.
"Noting that Dullahan worked four furlongs in 45.82 seconds at Belmont – the fastest of 66 works at the distance Sunday – Romans said that “was good enough to think that he is going to handle the dirt here no problem.”
Here's the thread where I said that stuff if somebody wants to look at it. THREAD (posts 9 and 10)
It's the same thread where dipshit (AngryBarber) was shooting his big mouth off about the horse not having a prayer on dirt.
Here's the article that dipshit (AngryBarber) got the Romans quote from.
ARTICLE
What I find funny about that is that a lot of the stuff I was saying about Dullahan BEFORE the Derby is in there.
I said that his first two races on dirt were sprints, which is not his game, and that he could have been a very "green" horse at the time which Romans pretty much confirms was the case.
“I thought we had a talented horse that wanted to stretch out,” trainer Dale Romans said. “I just wanted to get a good race into him that day.”
I also said before the Derby to look at how well Dullahan had worked on dirt at Gulfstream and Churchill.
"Noting that Dullahan worked four furlongs in 45.82 seconds at Belmont – the fastest of 66 works at the distance Sunday – Romans said that “was good enough to think that he is going to handle the dirt here no problem.”
Here's the thread where I said that stuff if somebody wants to look at it. THREAD (posts 9 and 10)
It's the same thread where dipshit (AngryBarber) was shooting his big mouth off about the horse not having a prayer on dirt.
The Derby was 5 weeks ago and you still talk about Dullahan like he won the race, HAHAHAHAHA. I think your a bit delusional and obviously have alot of free time on your hands to go back and look at old threads constantly.
The Derby was 5 weeks ago and you still talk about Dullahan like he won the race, HAHAHAHAHA. I think your a bit delusional and obviously have alot of free time on your hands to go back and look at old threads constantly.
its hillarious how you keep talking about Dullahan like hes the one running for the triple crown.
YOU DO REALIZE THAT HE HAS STILL NEVER WON A RACE ON DIRT!!
so your not right! its hillarious
You know, you bring up a very interesting point. Yesterday, on DRF, there were 3 stories involving Dull-ahan, one for the potential TC winner. The way I see it, the more attention paid To Dull and the less to IHA and UR, the better the odds.
its hillarious how you keep talking about Dullahan like hes the one running for the triple crown.
YOU DO REALIZE THAT HE HAS STILL NEVER WON A RACE ON DIRT!!
so your not right! its hillarious
You know, you bring up a very interesting point. Yesterday, on DRF, there were 3 stories involving Dull-ahan, one for the potential TC winner. The way I see it, the more attention paid To Dull and the less to IHA and UR, the better the odds.
FYI here, Dullahan has not only never won on dirt but he never hit the exacta either. However he is a Gr.1 winner albeit on poly.
Only 3 horses entered have won a Grade1 race amd most have never won any graded races! Just saying!
Just heard an amusing stat. We know that IHA has already beat the TC horses in this race, but he has also beat horses who beat every single remaining non-TC horse in the Belmont.
FYI here, Dullahan has not only never won on dirt but he never hit the exacta either. However he is a Gr.1 winner albeit on poly.
Only 3 horses entered have won a Grade1 race amd most have never won any graded races! Just saying!
Just heard an amusing stat. We know that IHA has already beat the TC horses in this race, but he has also beat horses who beat every single remaining non-TC horse in the Belmont.
Gambler i agree, boxing the G1 winners in here could very likely be your trifecta. its pretty much the same has the preakness a handful of legit contenders and a bunch of nobodies.
DJ i know you like to look back at previous big races and how horses perform after those races like the Bluegrass. an angle im looking for on saturday is how Hierro runs in Woody Stephens.
I say this in regards to Paynter, ran a respectable 4th in the SA derby in his 2nd career start and we all know how key the SA derby has turned out to be. IHA going for the triple crown and Creative Cause did not disgrace himself in the derby or preakness.
Hierro beat Paynter next out in the Derby trial and hasnt run since, so im looking forward to see how Hierro runs. very easily could make Paynter alot more intriguing.
Gambler i agree, boxing the G1 winners in here could very likely be your trifecta. its pretty much the same has the preakness a handful of legit contenders and a bunch of nobodies.
DJ i know you like to look back at previous big races and how horses perform after those races like the Bluegrass. an angle im looking for on saturday is how Hierro runs in Woody Stephens.
I say this in regards to Paynter, ran a respectable 4th in the SA derby in his 2nd career start and we all know how key the SA derby has turned out to be. IHA going for the triple crown and Creative Cause did not disgrace himself in the derby or preakness.
Hierro beat Paynter next out in the Derby trial and hasnt run since, so im looking forward to see how Hierro runs. very easily could make Paynter alot more intriguing.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.