Has Army ever won? Think Navy is a little to quick for them, and once again Army just stinks!.....again.But ya gotta take stats comig into this game with a grain of salt.This game is and i hope always will be,on guts & emotion.Line will probably move a point or 2 in Army favor and i will take them and hope for a good game.Will raise a toast or 2 in honor of their commitment.
Has Army ever won? Think Navy is a little to quick for them, and once again Army just stinks!.....again.But ya gotta take stats comig into this game with a grain of salt.This game is and i hope always will be,on guts & emotion.Line will probably move a point or 2 in Army favor and i will take them and hope for a good game.Will raise a toast or 2 in honor of their commitment.
how are you going to flip flop with the words "BIG TIME" next to your prediction? Just shows you are desperate to do something big and you are leaning navy... its funny.
Anyway, Navy has won like 10 in a row and is the better team. Just comes down to how much they will win by... I say 6-10 but that doesn't help.... GL
how are you going to flip flop with the words "BIG TIME" next to your prediction? Just shows you are desperate to do something big and you are leaning navy... its funny.
Anyway, Navy has won like 10 in a row and is the better team. Just comes down to how much they will win by... I say 6-10 but that doesn't help.... GL
Army draws a lot of ? marks. However, Navy has been God awful as favorites this year and some of the schools that got the cover over them were the dregs of the NCAA. Teams like Florida Atlantic for instance. Small wager- I'll take the Black Knights, at least to cover in this spot.
Army draws a lot of ? marks. However, Navy has been God awful as favorites this year and some of the schools that got the cover over them were the dregs of the NCAA. Teams like Florida Atlantic for instance. Small wager- I'll take the Black Knights, at least to cover in this spot.
...Just a feeling Senior QB Steelman finally leads Army to victory this year...Navy not as good as 7-4 record may suggest.
ARMY ML and +7
you need to get rid of that feeling. ARMY is much worse than Navy this year and will have no chance against the run. Temple put up 63 for a reason. Navy by 28
...Just a feeling Senior QB Steelman finally leads Army to victory this year...Navy not as good as 7-4 record may suggest.
ARMY ML and +7
you need to get rid of that feeling. ARMY is much worse than Navy this year and will have no chance against the run. Temple put up 63 for a reason. Navy by 28
Navy 32 vs. Army 17 "The Mids generally fielded a bigger and faster defense than West Point, and that's the case again this season. Rich Ellerson's Black Night "D" is arguably the lightest stop unit in the country (no starters over 255 lbs.) and has been routinely over-run by any competent, and non-competent attack it has faced this term! Even Stony Brook and Eastern Michigan were able to roll up nearly 500 and 600 yards, respectively.
And while both teams and their pet option attacks again rank at or near the top of national rushing stats, and the aerial portion of Navy's version isn't to mistaken for Oklahoma State's, the Mids' ability to occasionally sneak a deep pass downfield has been superior to that of the Black Knight for the past decade, and is again this season, as Army is once more dead last (42 ypg) in national passing stats.
And Navy has been a different team since frosh QB Keenan Reynolds...took over the controls in early October at Air Force; the Mids have won 6 of 7 SU since to become bowl-eligible for the ninth time in ten seasons!
Must agree here and run full speed ahead with Navy! Navy now on a 7-1 straight up winning run record last 7 games! But Army now only 2-8 straight up last ten games!
And Army now only 1-5 vs. point spread last six games!
Also, running backs for Army are "questionable" for Saturday's game with ankle and hip injuries! RB Malcolm Brown (384 YDs) and "key" RB Larry Dixon (778 YDs with 6 TDs) might be out...or not up to full power with major running back positions!
Navy vs. Army "under" the total last 6 meetings!
Will trust in Navy QB Keenan Reynolds (754 YDs and 8 TDs) to put up all-important early points, match points with Army QB Trent Steelman and cover the Vegas spread.
Navy 32 vs. Army 17 "The Mids generally fielded a bigger and faster defense than West Point, and that's the case again this season. Rich Ellerson's Black Night "D" is arguably the lightest stop unit in the country (no starters over 255 lbs.) and has been routinely over-run by any competent, and non-competent attack it has faced this term! Even Stony Brook and Eastern Michigan were able to roll up nearly 500 and 600 yards, respectively.
And while both teams and their pet option attacks again rank at or near the top of national rushing stats, and the aerial portion of Navy's version isn't to mistaken for Oklahoma State's, the Mids' ability to occasionally sneak a deep pass downfield has been superior to that of the Black Knight for the past decade, and is again this season, as Army is once more dead last (42 ypg) in national passing stats.
And Navy has been a different team since frosh QB Keenan Reynolds...took over the controls in early October at Air Force; the Mids have won 6 of 7 SU since to become bowl-eligible for the ninth time in ten seasons!
Must agree here and run full speed ahead with Navy! Navy now on a 7-1 straight up winning run record last 7 games! But Army now only 2-8 straight up last ten games!
And Army now only 1-5 vs. point spread last six games!
Also, running backs for Army are "questionable" for Saturday's game with ankle and hip injuries! RB Malcolm Brown (384 YDs) and "key" RB Larry Dixon (778 YDs with 6 TDs) might be out...or not up to full power with major running back positions!
Navy vs. Army "under" the total last 6 meetings!
Will trust in Navy QB Keenan Reynolds (754 YDs and 8 TDs) to put up all-important early points, match points with Army QB Trent Steelman and cover the Vegas spread.
Take NAVY and a small play on the UNDER. Looking at even past games between these two, when they mainly run the ball it stays under 56. When they were passing teams, then it went over. This year these teams don't average 100 yards passing. Run games eat clock all day long so it doesn't help.
Navy has a much better defense than Army, especially in scoring so Navy will score and score more often than Army. Both RB's that Army uses for scoring might not play or will play under 100% so that doesn't help them any. They'll have to rely primarily on the legs of the QB which will be easier to contain if they don't have to worry about as many RBs.
Damn, I might go Navy 1st half, 2nd half, and Under.
Take NAVY and a small play on the UNDER. Looking at even past games between these two, when they mainly run the ball it stays under 56. When they were passing teams, then it went over. This year these teams don't average 100 yards passing. Run games eat clock all day long so it doesn't help.
Navy has a much better defense than Army, especially in scoring so Navy will score and score more often than Army. Both RB's that Army uses for scoring might not play or will play under 100% so that doesn't help them any. They'll have to rely primarily on the legs of the QB which will be easier to contain if they don't have to worry about as many RBs.
Damn, I might go Navy 1st half, 2nd half, and Under.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.