you really dont pick the favorites all the time do you?
ive been seeing your selections and they all seem to be odds on.
everyone here says you pick chalk cant possibly win likw that.
and rolling pick 3s with 1 horse everyrace your never gonna win like that i think you need multiple horses in pick 3s and 4s to really have a shot.why post chalk everyday.
you really dont pick the favorites all the time do you?
ive been seeing your selections and they all seem to be odds on.
everyone here says you pick chalk cant possibly win likw that.
and rolling pick 3s with 1 horse everyrace your never gonna win like that i think you need multiple horses in pick 3s and 4s to really have a shot.why post chalk everyday.
you really dont pick the favorites all the time do you?
ive been seeing your selections and they all seem to be odds on.
everyone here says you pick chalk cant possibly win likw that.
and rolling pick 3s with 1 horse everyrace your never gonna win like that i think you need multiple horses in pick 3s and 4s to really have a shot.why post chalk everyday.
You will soon learn to ignore him!
you really dont pick the favorites all the time do you?
ive been seeing your selections and they all seem to be odds on.
everyone here says you pick chalk cant possibly win likw that.
and rolling pick 3s with 1 horse everyrace your never gonna win like that i think you need multiple horses in pick 3s and 4s to really have a shot.why post chalk everyday.
You will soon learn to ignore him!
But you had this thread just in case he won.
But you had this thread just in case he won.
But you had this thread just in case he won.
Well at least he posts some picks. When is the last time you posted a pick big guy? Did you post any for the Triple Crown trail so far?
But you had this thread just in case he won.
Well at least he posts some picks. When is the last time you posted a pick big guy? Did you post any for the Triple Crown trail so far?
Well at least he posts some picks. When is the last time you posted a pick big guy? Did you post any for the Triple Crown trail so far?
I can undertand your defense given that you have become as irrelevant to the forum as the poster who started this thread.
You both tend to post 20 links to 20 different horses. The only difference is you don't go back and bump the link listing the winning horse.
And I will never comment on anyone for posting a losing play (which I have seen you do umpteen times). But there is no other forum where posters would get away with posting both sides of the game. The difference is the respected handicappers in this forum aren't the type to really call out other posters.Well at least he posts some picks. When is the last time you posted a pick big guy? Did you post any for the Triple Crown trail so far?
I can undertand your defense given that you have become as irrelevant to the forum as the poster who started this thread.
You both tend to post 20 links to 20 different horses. The only difference is you don't go back and bump the link listing the winning horse.
And I will never comment on anyone for posting a losing play (which I have seen you do umpteen times). But there is no other forum where posters would get away with posting both sides of the game. The difference is the respected handicappers in this forum aren't the type to really call out other posters.I agree with the above 2 posts. Why do we need a Mod. that is rarely here, posts zero selections and posts links to another website ( which currently eludes me) and just shows up to bash people?
JMO but dabrow is not an asset here?
I agree with the above 2 posts. Why do we need a Mod. that is rarely here, posts zero selections and posts links to another website ( which currently eludes me) and just shows up to bash people?
JMO but dabrow is not an asset here?
I can undertand your defense given that you have become as irrelevant to the forum as the poster who started this thread.
You both tend to post 20 links to 20 different horses. The only difference is you don't go back and bump the link listing the winning horse.
+ Gayhound was the first to knock Mario Gutierrez riding IHA in the derby.
except Mario is going for the triple crown
Please someone find the thread, I don't have the time to do the digging.
I can undertand your defense given that you have become as irrelevant to the forum as the poster who started this thread.
You both tend to post 20 links to 20 different horses. The only difference is you don't go back and bump the link listing the winning horse.
+ Gayhound was the first to knock Mario Gutierrez riding IHA in the derby.
except Mario is going for the triple crown
Please someone find the thread, I don't have the time to do the digging.
I agree with the above 2 posts. Why do we need a Mod. that is rarely here, posts zero selections and posts links to another website ( which currently eludes me) and just shows up to bash people?
JMO but dabrow is not an asset here?
I've never bashed people in this forum, unlike you.
I point out when a poster makes multiple selections on the same race, only to bump the winning thread.
I agree with the above 2 posts. Why do we need a Mod. that is rarely here, posts zero selections and posts links to another website ( which currently eludes me) and just shows up to bash people?
JMO but dabrow is not an asset here?
I've never bashed people in this forum, unlike you.
I point out when a poster makes multiple selections on the same race, only to bump the winning thread.
I can undertand your defense given that you have become as irrelevant to the forum as the poster who started this thread.
You both tend to post 20 links to 20 different horses. The only difference is you don't go back and bump the link listing the winning horse.
And I will never comment on anyone for posting a losing play (which I have seen you do umpteen times). But there is no other forum where posters would get away with posting both sides of the game. The difference is the respected handicappers in this forum aren't the type to really call out other posters.
I'm not defending Roused. But he takes a lot of shit from people who aren't that great of handicappers themselves. I used to do it myself but I pretty much stopped it.
And you haven't answered the question?
When was your last pick?
And as far as being relevant / irrelevant, I couldn't care less. I just come here to talk horse racing, provide some information if I have it, and post a few picks. I'm not trying to be relevant.
Chicapper very true about Gutierrez. I was knocking him for his inexperience. Never rode a race at Churchill. But if you read my posts a little later on I was saying the jockey isn't everything and he does have some skills obviously.
I can undertand your defense given that you have become as irrelevant to the forum as the poster who started this thread.
You both tend to post 20 links to 20 different horses. The only difference is you don't go back and bump the link listing the winning horse.
And I will never comment on anyone for posting a losing play (which I have seen you do umpteen times). But there is no other forum where posters would get away with posting both sides of the game. The difference is the respected handicappers in this forum aren't the type to really call out other posters.
I'm not defending Roused. But he takes a lot of shit from people who aren't that great of handicappers themselves. I used to do it myself but I pretty much stopped it.
And you haven't answered the question?
When was your last pick?
And as far as being relevant / irrelevant, I couldn't care less. I just come here to talk horse racing, provide some information if I have it, and post a few picks. I'm not trying to be relevant.
Chicapper very true about Gutierrez. I was knocking him for his inexperience. Never rode a race at Churchill. But if you read my posts a little later on I was saying the jockey isn't everything and he does have some skills obviously.
I'm not defending Roused. But he takes a lot of shit from people who aren't that great of handicappers themselves. I used to do it myself but I pretty much stopped it.
And you haven't answered the question?
When was your last pick?
And as far as being relevant / irrelevant, I couldn't care less. I just come here to talk horse racing, provide some information if I have it, and post a few picks. I'm not trying to be relevant.
Chicapper very true about Gutierrez. I was knocking him for his inexperience. Never rode a race at Churchill. But if you read my posts a little later on I was saying the jockey isn't everything and he does have some skills obviously.
Understood. And I will quote one of your other threads:
"He's also got a jockey Russell Sheldon who's inexperienced in the Derby and at Churchill which is obviously a negative. But the jockey isn't everything. And those jockeys I've been trashing on here (Sheldon, Gutierrez, O'Donoghue) do have some skills obviously. They aren't total garbage. "
I'm not defending Roused. But he takes a lot of shit from people who aren't that great of handicappers themselves. I used to do it myself but I pretty much stopped it.
And you haven't answered the question?
When was your last pick?
And as far as being relevant / irrelevant, I couldn't care less. I just come here to talk horse racing, provide some information if I have it, and post a few picks. I'm not trying to be relevant.
Chicapper very true about Gutierrez. I was knocking him for his inexperience. Never rode a race at Churchill. But if you read my posts a little later on I was saying the jockey isn't everything and he does have some skills obviously.
Understood. And I will quote one of your other threads:
"He's also got a jockey Russell Sheldon who's inexperienced in the Derby and at Churchill which is obviously a negative. But the jockey isn't everything. And those jockeys I've been trashing on here (Sheldon, Gutierrez, O'Donoghue) do have some skills obviously. They aren't total garbage. "
I'm not defending Roused. But he takes a lot of shit from people who aren't that great of handicappers themselves. I used to do it myself but I pretty much stopped it.
And you haven't answered the question?
When was your last pick?
And as far as being relevant / irrelevant, I couldn't care less. I just come here to talk horse racing, provide some information if I have it, and post a few picks. I'm not trying to be relevant.
Chicapper very true about Gutierrez. I was knocking him for his inexperience. Never rode a race at Churchill. But if you read my posts a little later on I was saying the jockey isn't everything and he does have some skills obviously.
I could care less about what people post as picks. There is no one on here who is going to blindly follow another person's picks absent the key word: analysis. That is why I pay attention to guys like Kurshka, Mickey P, Handikapper, etc.
I want to read thoughts and anlysis. Anyone can pick numbers.
And I have posted plenty of analysis. Some helpful and decent and some garbage.
I don't care about someone picking chalk. I don't care about someone picking longshots. Where this forum can be invaluable is when posters use splits and track bias numbers that makes you think.
Johnny did it last week on IHA and it made me look back at his late splits in the SA Derby.
And I was joking about irrelevant. I actually do read most of what you post in here.
I'm not defending Roused. But he takes a lot of shit from people who aren't that great of handicappers themselves. I used to do it myself but I pretty much stopped it.
And you haven't answered the question?
When was your last pick?
And as far as being relevant / irrelevant, I couldn't care less. I just come here to talk horse racing, provide some information if I have it, and post a few picks. I'm not trying to be relevant.
Chicapper very true about Gutierrez. I was knocking him for his inexperience. Never rode a race at Churchill. But if you read my posts a little later on I was saying the jockey isn't everything and he does have some skills obviously.
I could care less about what people post as picks. There is no one on here who is going to blindly follow another person's picks absent the key word: analysis. That is why I pay attention to guys like Kurshka, Mickey P, Handikapper, etc.
I want to read thoughts and anlysis. Anyone can pick numbers.
And I have posted plenty of analysis. Some helpful and decent and some garbage.
I don't care about someone picking chalk. I don't care about someone picking longshots. Where this forum can be invaluable is when posters use splits and track bias numbers that makes you think.
Johnny did it last week on IHA and it made me look back at his late splits in the SA Derby.
And I was joking about irrelevant. I actually do read most of what you post in here.
I could care less about what people post as picks. There is no one on here who is going to blindly follow another person's picks absent the key word: analysis. That is why I pay attention to guys like Kurshka, Mickey P, Handikapper, etc.
Kurshka analysis? When and in what year?
And you're wrong about that part I supersized up there. There are tons of people who come here and blindly bet on people's picks. I see it every time I post a winner. They come out of the woodwork with a thank you or whatever. Handikapper doesn't post that much analysis and there seems to be a ton of guys betting his picks. Either does Spliquid, MstrH, etc.
I could care less about what people post as picks. There is no one on here who is going to blindly follow another person's picks absent the key word: analysis. That is why I pay attention to guys like Kurshka, Mickey P, Handikapper, etc.
Kurshka analysis? When and in what year?
And you're wrong about that part I supersized up there. There are tons of people who come here and blindly bet on people's picks. I see it every time I post a winner. They come out of the woodwork with a thank you or whatever. Handikapper doesn't post that much analysis and there seems to be a ton of guys betting his picks. Either does Spliquid, MstrH, etc.
I've never bashed people in this forum, unlike you.
I point out when a poster makes multiple selections on the same race, only to bump the winning thread.
Fair enough dabrow, so where are your selections? What was that website again?
You win again buddy, you're the Mod. remember?
I've never bashed people in this forum, unlike you.
I point out when a poster makes multiple selections on the same race, only to bump the winning thread.
Fair enough dabrow, so where are your selections? What was that website again?
You win again buddy, you're the Mod. remember?
Kurshka analysis? When and in what year?
And you're wrong about that part I supersized up there. There are tons of people who come here and blindly bet on people's picks. I see it every time I post a winner. They come out of the woodwork with a thank you or whatever. Handikapper doesn't post that much analysis and there seems to be a ton of guys betting his picks. Either does Spliquid, MstrH, etc.
Yes, you don't just post numbers, unlike the poster above you. I have to imagine people are much more likely to pay attention to that.
I didn't say blindly bet on picks. I said blindly bet on numbers. And example is your Daddy Long Legs in the UAE thread.
Kurshka analysis? When and in what year?
And you're wrong about that part I supersized up there. There are tons of people who come here and blindly bet on people's picks. I see it every time I post a winner. They come out of the woodwork with a thank you or whatever. Handikapper doesn't post that much analysis and there seems to be a ton of guys betting his picks. Either does Spliquid, MstrH, etc.
Yes, you don't just post numbers, unlike the poster above you. I have to imagine people are much more likely to pay attention to that.
I didn't say blindly bet on picks. I said blindly bet on numbers. And example is your Daddy Long Legs in the UAE thread.
Fair enough dabrow, so where are your selections? What was that website again?
You win again buddy, you're the Mod. remember?
You must be a pleasure in real life.
I remember you accusing me of not providing prices for the Derby contest last year. Quite bizarre actually.Fair enough dabrow, so where are your selections? What was that website again?
You win again buddy, you're the Mod. remember?
You must be a pleasure in real life.
I remember you accusing me of not providing prices for the Derby contest last year. Quite bizarre actually.1. Very True people do tail blindly on here.
2. Didn't we already argue about having analysis and no analysis? There is a thread about this somewhere? Half the guys like analysis and half could care less as long as they got a free winner.
1. Very True people do tail blindly on here.
2. Didn't we already argue about having analysis and no analysis? There is a thread about this somewhere? Half the guys like analysis and half could care less as long as they got a free winner.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.