It was more important to protect the almighty football program, than stopping his friend from raping boys.
friend
you dont have a clue. and stop posting what the media wants you to believe. i believe in the law and the law clearly states joe paterno did everything necessary under the law. the only one with jurisdiction, and i have to say this again SAF, is the campus police and the man he told, the head of campus police Tim Schultz took it from there.
Tim Schultz was arrested and will be on trial for his wrong, and Joe Paterno would have been the #1 witness for the state. Which is why Schultz is now trying to weasel his way out and benefit from Joe's death.
It was more important to protect the almighty football program, than stopping his friend from raping boys.
friend
you dont have a clue. and stop posting what the media wants you to believe. i believe in the law and the law clearly states joe paterno did everything necessary under the law. the only one with jurisdiction, and i have to say this again SAF, is the campus police and the man he told, the head of campus police Tim Schultz took it from there.
Tim Schultz was arrested and will be on trial for his wrong, and Joe Paterno would have been the #1 witness for the state. Which is why Schultz is now trying to weasel his way out and benefit from Joe's death.
You obviously are not a parent. If you are, your children should be taken from you immediately. This is a moral issue concerning JoePa. These coaches all refer to themselves as "teachers". Teachers protect children, not football programs.
If that was your kid that was getting ass raped by Sandusky, would you feel that Paterno did all that he could? Would you want him to pass the buck to other enablers, or get the authorities involved? JoePa said himself that he didn't handle it correctly. Why does this fact keep eluding you?
You obviously are not a parent. If you are, your children should be taken from you immediately. This is a moral issue concerning JoePa. These coaches all refer to themselves as "teachers". Teachers protect children, not football programs.
If that was your kid that was getting ass raped by Sandusky, would you feel that Paterno did all that he could? Would you want him to pass the buck to other enablers, or get the authorities involved? JoePa said himself that he didn't handle it correctly. Why does this fact keep eluding you?
Blinded by loyalty- all these guys who take up for him just don't "get" it.We are talking about the sexual abuse of little boys. This is somehow getting pushed aside because of his great "football" program and all the money he gave back to the university to build buldings and libraries- who gives a shit- Joe Pa and many others were involved in a shameless coverup that will get exposed further as time goes on-
Blinded by loyalty- all these guys who take up for him just don't "get" it.We are talking about the sexual abuse of little boys. This is somehow getting pushed aside because of his great "football" program and all the money he gave back to the university to build buldings and libraries- who gives a shit- Joe Pa and many others were involved in a shameless coverup that will get exposed further as time goes on-
You obviously are not a parent. If you are, your children should be taken from you immediately. This is a moral issue concerning JoePa. These coaches all refer to themselves as "teachers". Teachers protect children, not football programs.
If that was your kid that was getting ass raped by Sandusky, would you feel that Paterno did all that he could? Would you want him to pass the buck to other enablers, or get the authorities involved? JoePa said himself that he didn't handle it correctly. Why does this fact keep eluding you?
yeah take kids from people because they dont believe joe paterno raped little kids or was part of a cover up as you say, which coincides with the DA saying the same thing and thus not charging him with a crime.
come to my doorstep and try. i will be waiting, i beg you.
You obviously are not a parent. If you are, your children should be taken from you immediately. This is a moral issue concerning JoePa. These coaches all refer to themselves as "teachers". Teachers protect children, not football programs.
If that was your kid that was getting ass raped by Sandusky, would you feel that Paterno did all that he could? Would you want him to pass the buck to other enablers, or get the authorities involved? JoePa said himself that he didn't handle it correctly. Why does this fact keep eluding you?
yeah take kids from people because they dont believe joe paterno raped little kids or was part of a cover up as you say, which coincides with the DA saying the same thing and thus not charging him with a crime.
come to my doorstep and try. i will be waiting, i beg you.
You obviously are not a parent. If you are, your children should be taken from you immediately. This is a moral issue concerning JoePa. These coaches all refer to themselves as "teachers". Teachers protect children, not football programs.
If that was your kid that was getting ass raped by Sandusky, would you feel that Paterno did all that he could? Would you want him to pass the buck to other enablers, or get the authorities involved? JoePa said himself that he didn't handle it correctly. Why does this fact keep eluding you?
when? quote it for everyone please.
"in hindsight i wish i had done more" is a general comment we all have said. i hope you have more, please tell me you have more than that comment made by a 86 year old man on his death bed.
because i know for fact he said on his death bed "i dont give a damn what people think of me, i never did. the truth will come out." as reported by sports illustrated.
You obviously are not a parent. If you are, your children should be taken from you immediately. This is a moral issue concerning JoePa. These coaches all refer to themselves as "teachers". Teachers protect children, not football programs.
If that was your kid that was getting ass raped by Sandusky, would you feel that Paterno did all that he could? Would you want him to pass the buck to other enablers, or get the authorities involved? JoePa said himself that he didn't handle it correctly. Why does this fact keep eluding you?
when? quote it for everyone please.
"in hindsight i wish i had done more" is a general comment we all have said. i hope you have more, please tell me you have more than that comment made by a 86 year old man on his death bed.
because i know for fact he said on his death bed "i dont give a damn what people think of me, i never did. the truth will come out." as reported by sports illustrated.
Blinded by loyalty- all these guys who take up for him just don't "get" it.We are talking about the sexual abuse of little boys. This is somehow getting pushed aside because of his great "football" program and all the money he gave back to the university to build buldings and libraries- who gives a shit- Joe Pa and many others were involved in a shameless coverup that will get exposed further as time goes on-
this coming from someone who is in support of drugs in their avatar, on a site where any little kid can come on here and see your advertisement for drugs, which continue to ruin our youth.
we will all wait for time to show us how joe paterno covered up child rape even though the DA has made it clear he in particular had nothing to do with such a thing and would be the #1 witness against those who were part of a possible cover up, both tim schultz and tim curley, two men he reported what he was told to.
Blinded by loyalty- all these guys who take up for him just don't "get" it.We are talking about the sexual abuse of little boys. This is somehow getting pushed aside because of his great "football" program and all the money he gave back to the university to build buldings and libraries- who gives a shit- Joe Pa and many others were involved in a shameless coverup that will get exposed further as time goes on-
this coming from someone who is in support of drugs in their avatar, on a site where any little kid can come on here and see your advertisement for drugs, which continue to ruin our youth.
we will all wait for time to show us how joe paterno covered up child rape even though the DA has made it clear he in particular had nothing to do with such a thing and would be the #1 witness against those who were part of a possible cover up, both tim schultz and tim curley, two men he reported what he was told to.
Support drugs? Nope, not even close. I have even recently argued with others in one of my threads about when Dre Kirkpatrick got arrested recently. I argued about the evils of drug use. So go fish somewhere else with that. Coverup may be too strong of a term but Joe Pa knew something was wrong and he turned the other way and did nothing about it. If you think he had no idea then you are clueless. My best friend lived in that part of the country from 2000-2004 and he heard rumors about Sandusky then. You think Joe Pa had no clue? Clearly nothing was done by Joe to get rid of Sandusky from campus. And yes he had the power to do so despite what people think. The others are just as guilty too. And Sandusky will get his in prison so no worries there. He'll end up dead soon enough.
Support drugs? Nope, not even close. I have even recently argued with others in one of my threads about when Dre Kirkpatrick got arrested recently. I argued about the evils of drug use. So go fish somewhere else with that. Coverup may be too strong of a term but Joe Pa knew something was wrong and he turned the other way and did nothing about it. If you think he had no idea then you are clueless. My best friend lived in that part of the country from 2000-2004 and he heard rumors about Sandusky then. You think Joe Pa had no clue? Clearly nothing was done by Joe to get rid of Sandusky from campus. And yes he had the power to do so despite what people think. The others are just as guilty too. And Sandusky will get his in prison so no worries there. He'll end up dead soon enough.
Support drugs? Nope, not even close. I have even recently argued with others in one of my threads about when Dre Kirkpatrick got arrested recently. I argued about the evils of drug use. So go fish somewhere else with that. Coverup may be too strong of a term but Joe Pa knew something was wrong and he turned the other way and did nothing about it. If you think he had no idea then you are clueless. My best friend lived in that part of the country from 2000-2004 and he heard rumors about Sandusky then. You think Joe Pa had no clue? Clearly nothing was done by Joe to get rid of Sandusky from campus. And yes he had the power to do so despite what people think. The others are just as guilty too. And Sandusky will get his in prison so no worries there. He'll end up dead soon enough.
wondering if Sandusky's sick Pig of a Wife won't face charges down the road....
from what I read she allowed her pedophile Husband to have Boys over in the basement and did nothing when they cried out for help
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
Support drugs? Nope, not even close. I have even recently argued with others in one of my threads about when Dre Kirkpatrick got arrested recently. I argued about the evils of drug use. So go fish somewhere else with that. Coverup may be too strong of a term but Joe Pa knew something was wrong and he turned the other way and did nothing about it. If you think he had no idea then you are clueless. My best friend lived in that part of the country from 2000-2004 and he heard rumors about Sandusky then. You think Joe Pa had no clue? Clearly nothing was done by Joe to get rid of Sandusky from campus. And yes he had the power to do so despite what people think. The others are just as guilty too. And Sandusky will get his in prison so no worries there. He'll end up dead soon enough.
wondering if Sandusky's sick Pig of a Wife won't face charges down the road....
from what I read she allowed her pedophile Husband to have Boys over in the basement and did nothing when they cried out for help
Support drugs? Nope, not even close. I have even recently argued with others in one of my threads about when Dre Kirkpatrick got arrested recently. I argued about the evils of drug use. So go fish somewhere else with that. Coverup may be too strong of a term but Joe Pa knew something was wrong and he turned the other way and did nothing about it. If you think he had no idea then you are clueless. My best friend lived in that part of the country from 2000-2004 and he heard rumors about Sandusky then. You think Joe Pa had no clue? Clearly nothing was done by Joe to get rid of Sandusky from campus. And yes he had the power to do so despite what people think. The others are just as guilty too. And Sandusky will get his in prison so no worries there. He'll end up dead soon enough.
he had a clue...thats why he fired sandusky in 1998 even after police found no wrong doing of the creep in an investigation. he had a clue...thats why he went to the chief of police and AD in 2002 to handle the matter since the creep was no longer his employee...he had a clue...thats why he went to the AD and asked what the hell is jerry doing on campus and was told to "butt out". Emeritus status is only granted by the State of Pennsylvania, not a football coach. Emeritus status allows a retired employee to maintain what Sandusky was allowed to keep on campus, including use of facilities. There is not a damn thing any football coach can do, no matter how long hes been there. Just a fact.
i am worried about jerry sandusky being free like oj simpson, kaylee anthony and so many that get off on our justice system.. the man should be hung by his nuts so have no idea what you are talking about as if i have ever defended that scumbag.
TRY THIS...i run a business where a customer is suspected to be a little creepy and a possible child molester. i know a former police officer who ran a criminal background check on him and he checked out fine other than minor stuff. the guy is a school teacher and works out with kids. my hands are tied, there is nothing i can do legally. i cant arrest the guy, yea hes probably a creep and i and many other people know it...but i cant stop him from doing anything, all i can do is notify the authorities to check him out..they ask me what i know, i said nothing but heresay..i have no idea for certain if he is a child molester...and i cant arrest him because rumors are he is. sound familiar?
i would love to hear your suggestions other than the immature response of beating the hell out of the old dude because he "may" be a child predator and putting myself behind bars and losing my business..
Support drugs? Nope, not even close. I have even recently argued with others in one of my threads about when Dre Kirkpatrick got arrested recently. I argued about the evils of drug use. So go fish somewhere else with that. Coverup may be too strong of a term but Joe Pa knew something was wrong and he turned the other way and did nothing about it. If you think he had no idea then you are clueless. My best friend lived in that part of the country from 2000-2004 and he heard rumors about Sandusky then. You think Joe Pa had no clue? Clearly nothing was done by Joe to get rid of Sandusky from campus. And yes he had the power to do so despite what people think. The others are just as guilty too. And Sandusky will get his in prison so no worries there. He'll end up dead soon enough.
he had a clue...thats why he fired sandusky in 1998 even after police found no wrong doing of the creep in an investigation. he had a clue...thats why he went to the chief of police and AD in 2002 to handle the matter since the creep was no longer his employee...he had a clue...thats why he went to the AD and asked what the hell is jerry doing on campus and was told to "butt out". Emeritus status is only granted by the State of Pennsylvania, not a football coach. Emeritus status allows a retired employee to maintain what Sandusky was allowed to keep on campus, including use of facilities. There is not a damn thing any football coach can do, no matter how long hes been there. Just a fact.
i am worried about jerry sandusky being free like oj simpson, kaylee anthony and so many that get off on our justice system.. the man should be hung by his nuts so have no idea what you are talking about as if i have ever defended that scumbag.
TRY THIS...i run a business where a customer is suspected to be a little creepy and a possible child molester. i know a former police officer who ran a criminal background check on him and he checked out fine other than minor stuff. the guy is a school teacher and works out with kids. my hands are tied, there is nothing i can do legally. i cant arrest the guy, yea hes probably a creep and i and many other people know it...but i cant stop him from doing anything, all i can do is notify the authorities to check him out..they ask me what i know, i said nothing but heresay..i have no idea for certain if he is a child molester...and i cant arrest him because rumors are he is. sound familiar?
i would love to hear your suggestions other than the immature response of beating the hell out of the old dude because he "may" be a child predator and putting myself behind bars and losing my business..
Even after learning that Sandusky was raping children, JoePa was still in business ventures with The Second Mile Foundation, and profiting handsomely.
He knowingly was involved with a supposed charity, which turned out to be a rape factory for Sandusky.
Enabler of child rape, and not a good man. He was a terrible person, and anybody who still supports him in the face of all of this evidence, needs to check their moral compass.
Even after learning that Sandusky was raping children, JoePa was still in business ventures with The Second Mile Foundation, and profiting handsomely.
He knowingly was involved with a supposed charity, which turned out to be a rape factory for Sandusky.
Enabler of child rape, and not a good man. He was a terrible person, and anybody who still supports him in the face of all of this evidence, needs to check their moral compass.
45-7 to wisky and 30-10 to HOUSTON. resurgence, last years end o season was just the beginning
4 top 150 recruits months removed from scandal inclduing a big time qb and #1 tight end in the nation.
you speak of two games after scandal and controversy of joe being fired, with their starting qb out with a lame duck head coach who had no control but of course you omit the win at ohio state and the 3 pt loss to nebraska because of a missed fg.
they are a qb and offensive coach away from being back to top 10 which they were just 3 years ago. i think they just got both for the future.
45-7 to wisky and 30-10 to HOUSTON. resurgence, last years end o season was just the beginning
4 top 150 recruits months removed from scandal inclduing a big time qb and #1 tight end in the nation.
you speak of two games after scandal and controversy of joe being fired, with their starting qb out with a lame duck head coach who had no control but of course you omit the win at ohio state and the 3 pt loss to nebraska because of a missed fg.
they are a qb and offensive coach away from being back to top 10 which they were just 3 years ago. i think they just got both for the future.
I also wonder about Sandusky's wife in this situation- seems she is probably guilty as well- You say Paterno fired Sandusky in 1998(supposedly for the allegations of misconduct with boys) Well Paterno can't just fired his defensive coordinator without consulting the AD. Are you saying he had the power to get Sandusky canned in 1998 then couldn't do anything about them giving Sandusky Emeritus status? That's far fetched and you know it- or just complete bullshit- The man could get things done- Why did Paterno still give to Jerry's Foundation all the way up until 2011? Why would he give Sandusky's foundation money if he supposedly fired him in 1998? Why would he let Jerry still bring kids to HIS teams practices??? That is inexcusable. I think what in not far fetched is they all worked out a deal to fire Sandusky, call it a resignation, and it turn give Sandusky Emeritus status so he wouldn't talk and tarnish the Penn St. "legacy" - My buddy lived near campus and heard the constant stories of Joe Pa getting his players bailed out of trouble and keeping things covered up. Yes, this happens all over but to make Joe Pa into some kind of Saint is ridiculous. Many are guilty of not doing enough and Joe Pa was one of them.
I also wonder about Sandusky's wife in this situation- seems she is probably guilty as well- You say Paterno fired Sandusky in 1998(supposedly for the allegations of misconduct with boys) Well Paterno can't just fired his defensive coordinator without consulting the AD. Are you saying he had the power to get Sandusky canned in 1998 then couldn't do anything about them giving Sandusky Emeritus status? That's far fetched and you know it- or just complete bullshit- The man could get things done- Why did Paterno still give to Jerry's Foundation all the way up until 2011? Why would he give Sandusky's foundation money if he supposedly fired him in 1998? Why would he let Jerry still bring kids to HIS teams practices??? That is inexcusable. I think what in not far fetched is they all worked out a deal to fire Sandusky, call it a resignation, and it turn give Sandusky Emeritus status so he wouldn't talk and tarnish the Penn St. "legacy" - My buddy lived near campus and heard the constant stories of Joe Pa getting his players bailed out of trouble and keeping things covered up. Yes, this happens all over but to make Joe Pa into some kind of Saint is ridiculous. Many are guilty of not doing enough and Joe Pa was one of them.
I'm a huge LSU fan but have always liked Penn St. and Paterno. However he was a man, and all men have faults and apparently Joe had his. I just hope the whole truth comes out and everybody involved gets punished for what they did or didn't do.
I'm a huge LSU fan but have always liked Penn St. and Paterno. However he was a man, and all men have faults and apparently Joe had his. I just hope the whole truth comes out and everybody involved gets punished for what they did or didn't do.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.