my "shoe is on the other foot" example has every reason to be discussed
it is the reason your support of terror will never work in the long term, it is a failed ideology that has been proven, no matter the technological advances
no matter what your UN stats conjure up
actually, i was picketing the patriot act, you can ask my senator
now go get yourself a fresh cup of kool-aid
You're a paulbot....
You seem to be telling people not to drink cool aid yet you and the other paul bots on covers drink the strongest type....
my "shoe is on the other foot" example has every reason to be discussed
it is the reason your support of terror will never work in the long term, it is a failed ideology that has been proven, no matter the technological advances
no matter what your UN stats conjure up
actually, i was picketing the patriot act, you can ask my senator
now go get yourself a fresh cup of kool-aid
You're a paulbot....
You seem to be telling people not to drink cool aid yet you and the other paul bots on covers drink the strongest type....
If we were fighting a war where there were two armies against each other then drones would be great. We are currently fighting a war where the insurgents understand that they need to take maximum civilian cover, because even if they get bombed they will accomplish an important goal of turning the populous against the occupiers.
If we were fighting a war where there were two armies against each other then drones would be great. We are currently fighting a war where the insurgents understand that they need to take maximum civilian cover, because even if they get bombed they will accomplish an important goal of turning the populous against the occupiers.
If we were fighting a war where there were two armies against each other then drones would be great. We are currently fighting a war where the insurgents understand that they need to take maximum civilian cover, because even if they get bombed they will accomplish an important goal of turning the populous against the occupiers.
That's an interesting point but a ground army doesn't help that cause or reduce the rate at which civilians will not die.
There are still innocent civilians in which terrorists will use to strap bombs to as decoys.. etc.....
However I believe that drone strikes are a more proportional response to the threat posed by terrorists rather than risking American soldiers in addition to civilians that can be just as adequately used in response to a ground army.
Again though don't get me wrong I do believe that drone strikes should be closer to a last resort method in dealing with terrorist attacks.
If we were fighting a war where there were two armies against each other then drones would be great. We are currently fighting a war where the insurgents understand that they need to take maximum civilian cover, because even if they get bombed they will accomplish an important goal of turning the populous against the occupiers.
That's an interesting point but a ground army doesn't help that cause or reduce the rate at which civilians will not die.
There are still innocent civilians in which terrorists will use to strap bombs to as decoys.. etc.....
However I believe that drone strikes are a more proportional response to the threat posed by terrorists rather than risking American soldiers in addition to civilians that can be just as adequately used in response to a ground army.
Again though don't get me wrong I do believe that drone strikes should be closer to a last resort method in dealing with terrorist attacks.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.