It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
It is certainly arguable as to what the best methods are of addressing the problem, how vital the problem is, and whose self-interest the perceptions are.
But to just suggest as a few of those in here have done, that there is no issue, no possible connection, and is all a rouse?
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
It is certainly arguable as to what the best methods are of addressing the problem, how vital the problem is, and whose self-interest the perceptions are.
But to just suggest as a few of those in here have done, that there is no issue, no possible connection, and is all a rouse?
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
==============
The climate is in a constant state of flux. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
===================
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
=========
"Arguable" how? Is there any evidence mankind is creating change? What is a "normal" level of climate variability and what would be a "abnormal" level of change and how would we measure it?
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
==============
The climate is in a constant state of flux. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
===================
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
=========
"Arguable" how? Is there any evidence mankind is creating change? What is a "normal" level of climate variability and what would be a "abnormal" level of change and how would we measure it?
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
It is certainly arguable as to what the best methods are of addressing the problem, how vital the problem is, and whose self-interest the perceptions are.
But to just suggest as a few of those in here have done, that there is no issue, no possible connection, and is all a rouse?
Wow, just wow.
Really, because if the earth has scrubbed itself of the gases and black smoke that is clearly visable. What makes you think the earth cannot as effectively deal with the greenhouse gases that are clearly man made?
Surely, if significant Forrested areas continue to vanish to the point that the scrubbing process is compensated then we have an issue.
Man made causes severely affecting climate are exagerated. NO DOUBT!
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
It is certainly arguable as to what the best methods are of addressing the problem, how vital the problem is, and whose self-interest the perceptions are.
But to just suggest as a few of those in here have done, that there is no issue, no possible connection, and is all a rouse?
Wow, just wow.
Really, because if the earth has scrubbed itself of the gases and black smoke that is clearly visable. What makes you think the earth cannot as effectively deal with the greenhouse gases that are clearly man made?
Surely, if significant Forrested areas continue to vanish to the point that the scrubbing process is compensated then we have an issue.
Man made causes severely affecting climate are exagerated. NO DOUBT!
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
==============
The climate is in a constant state of flux. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
===================
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
=========
"Arguable" how? Is there any evidence mankind is creating change? What is a "normal" level of climate variability and what would be a "abnormal" level of change and how would we measure it?
Sentence one, I am saying the same thing as you. It is difficult to measure the change because the most useful information (long term patterns) would be based on projections/information that aren't readily available to us.
With that being said, I do find it intriguing that certain things like the polar caps and other long mainstays of the environment have clearly been compromised by something.
As to your second sentence, again, there really isn't an answer. We do know that certain emissions are damaging. How damaging and how reversible are unknown. But comments in absolutism like those in the post below yours or those that state with 100% affirmation that man is responsible for all of the weather changes on earth are exactly what I was referring to.
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
==============
The climate is in a constant state of flux. I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
===================
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
=========
"Arguable" how? Is there any evidence mankind is creating change? What is a "normal" level of climate variability and what would be a "abnormal" level of change and how would we measure it?
Sentence one, I am saying the same thing as you. It is difficult to measure the change because the most useful information (long term patterns) would be based on projections/information that aren't readily available to us.
With that being said, I do find it intriguing that certain things like the polar caps and other long mainstays of the environment have clearly been compromised by something.
As to your second sentence, again, there really isn't an answer. We do know that certain emissions are damaging. How damaging and how reversible are unknown. But comments in absolutism like those in the post below yours or those that state with 100% affirmation that man is responsible for all of the weather changes on earth are exactly what I was referring to.
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
It is certainly arguable as to what the best methods are of addressing the problem, how vital the problem is, and whose self-interest the perceptions are.
But to just suggest as a few of those in here have done, that there is no issue, no possible connection, and is all a rouse?
It is certainly arguable as to what extent our climate has changed.
It is certainly arguable as to what extent man has on climate change.
It is certainly arguable as to what the best methods are of addressing the problem, how vital the problem is, and whose self-interest the perceptions are.
But to just suggest as a few of those in here have done, that there is no issue, no possible connection, and is all a rouse?
Sentence one, I am saying the same thing as you. It is difficult to measure the change because the most useful information (long term patterns) would be based on projections/information that aren't readily available to us.
With that being said, I do find it intriguing that certain things like the polar caps and other long mainstays of the environment have clearly been compromised by something.
As to your second sentence, again, there really isn't an answer. We do know that certain emissions are damaging. How damaging and how reversible are unknown. But comments in absolutism like those in the post below yours or those that state with 100% affirmation that man is responsible for all of the weather changes on earth are exactly what I was referring to.
Please show me the comments that speak in absolutisms in his posts or mine that you speak of...
Sentence one, I am saying the same thing as you. It is difficult to measure the change because the most useful information (long term patterns) would be based on projections/information that aren't readily available to us.
With that being said, I do find it intriguing that certain things like the polar caps and other long mainstays of the environment have clearly been compromised by something.
As to your second sentence, again, there really isn't an answer. We do know that certain emissions are damaging. How damaging and how reversible are unknown. But comments in absolutism like those in the post below yours or those that state with 100% affirmation that man is responsible for all of the weather changes on earth are exactly what I was referring to.
Please show me the comments that speak in absolutisms in his posts or mine that you speak of...
And you question absolutism? You are making a statement that is an absolute assertion that you cannot possibly support.
That is absolutism.
Exagerated by a little or exagerated by a lot. Trust me...man made causes are exagerated. Otherwise the scientists would have nothing to worry about and thus, would not be resigning because of previous stance on the subject.
That one statement is hardly a tital wave of absolutes as you infer.
And you question absolutism? You are making a statement that is an absolute assertion that you cannot possibly support.
That is absolutism.
Exagerated by a little or exagerated by a lot. Trust me...man made causes are exagerated. Otherwise the scientists would have nothing to worry about and thus, would not be resigning because of previous stance on the subject.
That one statement is hardly a tital wave of absolutes as you infer.
ozone...does the destruction of that protection layer have nothing to do with mankind?
I guess the knuckleheads forgot about all the man made things that are eating a hole in it
The people who dont believe in climate change and man having some to do with it, are the people who dont care because they wont be around when the shit really hits the fan, let the people who are here deal with it. This helps these losers sleep better at night.
ozone...does the destruction of that protection layer have nothing to do with mankind?
I guess the knuckleheads forgot about all the man made things that are eating a hole in it
The people who dont believe in climate change and man having some to do with it, are the people who dont care because they wont be around when the shit really hits the fan, let the people who are here deal with it. This helps these losers sleep better at night.
I guess the knuckleheads forgot about all the man made things that are eating a hole in it
The people who dont believe in climate change and man having some to do with it, are the people who dont care because they wont be around when the shit really hits the fan, let the people who are here deal with it. This helps these losers sleep better at night.
Ozone can be destroyed by a number of free radical catalysts, the most important of which are the hydroxyl radical (OH·), the nitric oxide radical (NO·), the atomic chlorine ion (Cl·) and the atomic bromine ion (Br·). All of these have both natural and man-made sources; at the present time, most of the OH· and NO· in the stratosphere is of natural origin, but human activity has dramatically increased the levels of chlorine and bromine. These elements are found in certain stable organic compounds, especially chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which may find their way to the stratosphere without being destroyed in the troposphere due to their low reactivity. Once in the stratosphere, the Cl and Br atoms are liberated from the parent compounds by the action of ultraviolet light, e.g.
I guess the knuckleheads forgot about all the man made things that are eating a hole in it
The people who dont believe in climate change and man having some to do with it, are the people who dont care because they wont be around when the shit really hits the fan, let the people who are here deal with it. This helps these losers sleep better at night.
Ozone can be destroyed by a number of free radical catalysts, the most important of which are the hydroxyl radical (OH·), the nitric oxide radical (NO·), the atomic chlorine ion (Cl·) and the atomic bromine ion (Br·). All of these have both natural and man-made sources; at the present time, most of the OH· and NO· in the stratosphere is of natural origin, but human activity has dramatically increased the levels of chlorine and bromine. These elements are found in certain stable organic compounds, especially chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which may find their way to the stratosphere without being destroyed in the troposphere due to their low reactivity. Once in the stratosphere, the Cl and Br atoms are liberated from the parent compounds by the action of ultraviolet light, e.g.
lmfaoooooooooooo what a friggin jerkoff you are bowlslit. Am sure theres not articles that will disagree with what you posted. Truth is i have no use for guys like you. I wish i could really state on this site what i think about you, but i wont. Karma will catch your ass one day, that am sure of.
I suppose man isnt polluting the oceans, thats all natural, lmfaoooooooooooooo.. If not believing man isnt contributing to things makes you sleep better at night, then good for you. Am sure you have learned things like this at your insurance thief bootcamps
lmfaoooooooooooo what a friggin jerkoff you are bowlslit. Am sure theres not articles that will disagree with what you posted. Truth is i have no use for guys like you. I wish i could really state on this site what i think about you, but i wont. Karma will catch your ass one day, that am sure of.
I suppose man isnt polluting the oceans, thats all natural, lmfaoooooooooooooo.. If not believing man isnt contributing to things makes you sleep better at night, then good for you. Am sure you have learned things like this at your insurance thief bootcamps
lmfaoooooooooooo what a friggin jerkoff you are bowlslit. Am sure theres not articles that will disagree with what you posted. Truth is i have no use for guys like you. I wish i could really state on this site what i think about you, but i wont. Karma will catch your ass one day, that am sure of.
I suppose man isnt polluting the oceans, thats all natural, lmfaoooooooooooooo.. If not believing man isnt contributing to things makes you sleep better at night, then good for you. Am sure you have learned things like this at your insurance thief bootcamps
To the hateful firefighter who would rather post hate speech then valid arguements: I don't hate you...I feel bad for you because you lack the common sense needed to navigate through life properly.
Once again...nothing but hate speach from you and no real discussion.
lmfaoooooooooooo what a friggin jerkoff you are bowlslit. Am sure theres not articles that will disagree with what you posted. Truth is i have no use for guys like you. I wish i could really state on this site what i think about you, but i wont. Karma will catch your ass one day, that am sure of.
I suppose man isnt polluting the oceans, thats all natural, lmfaoooooooooooooo.. If not believing man isnt contributing to things makes you sleep better at night, then good for you. Am sure you have learned things like this at your insurance thief bootcamps
To the hateful firefighter who would rather post hate speech then valid arguements: I don't hate you...I feel bad for you because you lack the common sense needed to navigate through life properly.
Once again...nothing but hate speach from you and no real discussion.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.