Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
at unlv 12 with 2 seconds left and the clock stopped fresno coach kept the offense on the field and didnt kick a fg.
|
NuttCapper83 | 6 |
|
|
am i the only one here that had fresno -14.5 first half? the dumbfuck coach didnt kick the fg from the 12 yard line with 2 seconds left and left the offense on the field
|
Moey27 | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CarolinaPride: IF YOU WATCHED THE GAME, AGGIES COULD HAVE COVERED EASILY AND WON SU....BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS, A LOST IS A LOST !!! IM WINNING MORE THAN IM LOSING AND THATS ALL GHAT MATTERS !!!! UTAH ST +6 ... we must not have been watching the same game. boise covered and won easily. utah st couldn't do anything on offense. it was 34-10 in the 4th quarter before boise went to sleep and utah st scored a few garbage tds. |
CarolinaPride | 23 |
|
|
u guys claiming clemson shouldn't have gone for 2 up by 19 are absolutely nuts
|
Sourdough1187 | 60 |
|
|
vegas insider has fsu -39 against bethune cookman and the U -55 against the worst team in the fcs, savannah st.
im looking to make fsu my largest play of the season to date, as jimbo fisher has shown he loves to run up the score on the scrub teams. only hesitation is that bethune's record indicates they are a pretty solid team. can anybody familiar with that program provide some insight as to why i shouldn't unload on fsu? i also intend on making a small bet on miami as savannah st is worse than some high school teams. |
adampeck | 1 |
|
|
weber st isnt gonna score. utah st probably wont throw the ball again. 5 scores is alot when its already 49-0
|
adampeck | 4 |
|
|
utah st under 31.5
|
adampeck | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS: need to look more into the Oregon defense before I make a play, UVA has decent talent and I like their coaching staff additions but they may be overwhelmed trying to defend the Ducks, I have thoughts as the week goes i watched the whole oregon/nichols game as i had the over, and i wasn't impressed with oregon's D. nichols consistently moved the ball deep into oregon territory before self imploding with missed fg's, penalties and turnovers. i can't even recall any 3 and outs. |
WahooS | 124 |
|
|
first half over 31 here.... lets go horns
|
adampeck | 1 |
|
|
i love laying heavy chalk early in the season, however, i usually play first half spreads and first half overs in these situations. i dont like to leave it up to the backups.
|
RS86 | 6 |
|
|
i love big favorites early on in the season, and the line im waiting on is texas first half. texas has taken a huge step down from where they were 7-10 years ago, but nmsu is straight up garbage. mack brown used to be an automatic cover in these spots when VY and mccoy were playing, but not so much lately. i think this will be the best texas offense since colt left, and they should be able to score with relative ease on nmsu.
|
adampeck | 5 |
|
|
midway last season, hawaii was probably one of the 5 worst fbs teams, primarily due to offensive ineptitude. this game is a usc play or none at all.
|
Super_Chicken | 34 |
|
|
good luck this season wahoo.... i remember you from back in the day, one of the most insightful and rational posters here
|
WahooS | 101 |
|
|
i haven't posted here in years, but will be back at it this season. stay tuned for week 1 plays, i generally play alot of first half spreads and totals early in the season.
|
adampeck | 5 |
|
|
this is my first time posting here in years, but ive been lurking.
way back in the day, covers used to be awesome. then, a group of some of the most well respected posters split and created their own website(CTG). immediately after, covers died down a ton, as alot of guys moved over there. slowly but surely covers has picked up steam, and right now its much better than it had been. however, it's not as strong as it was before. |
Workhorse | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Godfather16: OK, Dapook, you sound like a self-proclaimed expert, what area isn't the OSU not excelling in? what part of the game? And the 1995 Nebraska team was a great running team, if they needed to throw the ball to win they were in trouble, you know that, they had a great defense too. Now the great USC teams did not have a great defense, in 2004 they gave up about 13 PPG, in 2005 about 24 PPG, and Texas scored 41 on them in the NC. ROFL.... the 95 nebraska team was NEVER in trouble, so they didnt have to throw the ball.... USC's 04 championship team dominated on defense, just ask adrian peterson and heisman winner jason white.... even usc's 05 team that sucked on defense would destroy this years ohio state team |
Godfather16 | 585 |
|
|
i just saw this on espn.com, it kind of reminded me of that nebraska/michigan alamo bowl game from a few years back, except with about 7 more laterals, and a TD
i would say this is the best ending ever, but it looks like half the guys on defense were just standing around not even making a serious attempt to tackle the ballcarrier |
SportFanatic71 | 13 |
|
|
the announcers are dumbassess, that int is the same as a punt.... the int didnt hurt south carolina at all, it was the 2 penalties before them that killed their scoring chances
|
Denali | 179 |
|
|
if your on a supertight budget, the imperial palace is your best bet.
if you dont mind spending a little more, than go with flaming/ballys/harrahs |
GoldCoast | 14 |
|
|
nebraska 95 is the best team ever, hands down
id take usc 04 over miami 01, as usc had carroll and chow on the sidelines, while miami had larry coker |
CanucksPlaybook | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.