I side with the side that has compassion and promotes responsibility. How does your point of view promote those two things?
All I need...to make up my mind what side of the argument Im on is....is there a heartbeat or not?
And I have a good friend who is the product of a rape, and she is a pretty good person.
I side with the side that has compassion and promotes responsibility. How does your point of view promote those two things?
All I need...to make up my mind what side of the argument Im on is....is there a heartbeat or not?
And I have a good friend who is the product of a rape, and she is a pretty good person.
I simply pointed out the hypocracy of the worry about rape vs lack of worry about murder. I do believe snuffing a heartbeat constitutes murder.
Liberals worry more about stray cats then they do about a fetus with a clearly discernable heartbeat.
I simply pointed out the hypocracy of the worry about rape vs lack of worry about murder. I do believe snuffing a heartbeat constitutes murder.
Liberals worry more about stray cats then they do about a fetus with a clearly discernable heartbeat.
Simply because your religious freedoms end when where anothers begin. And the debate about the fetus is well still in doubt.
If a pregnant woman gets killed do we not charge the murderer with two counts?
Simply because your religious freedoms end when where anothers begin. And the debate about the fetus is well still in doubt.
If a pregnant woman gets killed do we not charge the murderer with two counts?
I simply pointed out the hypocracy of the worry about rape vs lack of worry about murder. I do believe snuffing a heartbeat constitutes murder.
Liberals worry more about stray cats then they do about a fetus with a clearly discernable heartbeat.
I simply pointed out the hypocracy of the worry about rape vs lack of worry about murder. I do believe snuffing a heartbeat constitutes murder.
Liberals worry more about stray cats then they do about a fetus with a clearly discernable heartbeat.
I believe the woman has a right and responsibility to not get pregnant in the first place. (rape is a different story)
I could comprimise a little and only charge a woman with murder on her second abortion. After the first one she should have learned her lesson.
I believe the woman has a right and responsibility to not get pregnant in the first place. (rape is a different story)
I could comprimise a little and only charge a woman with murder on her second abortion. After the first one she should have learned her lesson.
I believe the woman has a right and responsibility to not get pregnant in the first place. (rape is a different story)
I could comprimise a little and only charge a woman with murder on her second abortion. After the first one she should have learned her lesson.
I believe the woman has a right and responsibility to not get pregnant in the first place. (rape is a different story)
I could comprimise a little and only charge a woman with murder on her second abortion. After the first one she should have learned her lesson.
Awesome, so lets address the root of the problem which is in the home. Or even in the education system. I'm for handing out contraceptives in school if thats what it takes.
Lets fix the problem further upstream
Awesome, so lets address the root of the problem which is in the home. Or even in the education system. I'm for handing out contraceptives in school if thats what it takes.
Lets fix the problem further upstream
Snuffing out a heartbeat is less about religion than you think. You cant have a religion that believes they can murder people.
DO WE OR DO WE NOT CHARGE THE MURDERER OF A PREGNANT WOMAN WITH TWO COUNTS OF MURDER?
Is everyone afraid to answer that question?
Snuffing out a heartbeat is less about religion than you think. You cant have a religion that believes they can murder people.
DO WE OR DO WE NOT CHARGE THE MURDERER OF A PREGNANT WOMAN WITH TWO COUNTS OF MURDER?
Is everyone afraid to answer that question?
Awesome, so lets address the root of the problem which is in the home. Or even in the education system. I'm for handing out contraceptives in school if thats what it takes.
Lets fix the problem further upstream
Awesome, so lets address the root of the problem which is in the home. Or even in the education system. I'm for handing out contraceptives in school if thats what it takes.
Lets fix the problem further upstream
Snuffing out a heartbeat is less about religion than you think. You cant have a religion that believes they can murder people.
DO WE OR DO WE NOT CHARGE THE MURDERER OF A PREGNANT WOMAN WITH TWO COUNTS OF MURDER?
Is everyone afraid to answer that question?
Snuffing out a heartbeat is less about religion than you think. You cant have a religion that believes they can murder people.
DO WE OR DO WE NOT CHARGE THE MURDERER OF A PREGNANT WOMAN WITH TWO COUNTS OF MURDER?
Is everyone afraid to answer that question?
Wikipedia
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act, passed in 2004, defines a fetus as a "child in uterus" and a person as being a legal crime victim "if a fetal injury or death occurs during the commission of a federal violent crime."[8] In the U.S., 36 states have laws with more harsh penalties if the victim is murdered while pregnant. Some of these laws defining the fetus as being a person, "for the purpose of criminal prosecution of the offender" (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2008). Laci Peterson, murdered in 2002, is one of the more high-profile homicides.
Currently in the North Carolina Senate, a bill called the SB 353 Unborn Victims of Violence Act is being considered for legislation that would create a separate criminal offense for the death of a fetus when the mother is murdered. The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence does not support this law for numerous reasons including failure to see violence against the mother as the cause of the fetal death.[9] The Coalition does, however, support the position of the National Network to End Domestic Violence regarding the Unborn Victims of Violence Act.[citation
Wikipedia
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act, passed in 2004, defines a fetus as a "child in uterus" and a person as being a legal crime victim "if a fetal injury or death occurs during the commission of a federal violent crime."[8] In the U.S., 36 states have laws with more harsh penalties if the victim is murdered while pregnant. Some of these laws defining the fetus as being a person, "for the purpose of criminal prosecution of the offender" (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2008). Laci Peterson, murdered in 2002, is one of the more high-profile homicides.
Currently in the North Carolina Senate, a bill called the SB 353 Unborn Victims of Violence Act is being considered for legislation that would create a separate criminal offense for the death of a fetus when the mother is murdered. The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence does not support this law for numerous reasons including failure to see violence against the mother as the cause of the fetal death.[9] The Coalition does, however, support the position of the National Network to End Domestic Violence regarding the Unborn Victims of Violence Act.[citation
Wikipedia
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act, passed in 2004, defines a fetus as a "child in uterus" and a person as being a legal crime victim "if a fetal injury or death occurs during the commission of a federal violent crime."[8] In the U.S., 36 states have laws with more harsh penalties if the victim is murdered while pregnant. Some of these laws defining the fetus as being a person, "for the purpose of criminal prosecution of the offender" (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2008). Laci Peterson, murdered in 2002, is one of the more high-profile homicides.
Currently in the North Carolina Senate, a bill called the SB 353 Unborn Victims of Violence Act is being considered for legislation that would create a separate criminal offense for the death of a fetus when the mother is murdered. The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence does not support this law for numerous reasons including failure to see violence against the mother as the cause of the fetal death.[9] The Coalition does, however, support the position of the National Network to End Domestic Violence regarding the Unborn Victims of Violence Act.[citation
Wikipedia
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act, passed in 2004, defines a fetus as a "child in uterus" and a person as being a legal crime victim "if a fetal injury or death occurs during the commission of a federal violent crime."[8] In the U.S., 36 states have laws with more harsh penalties if the victim is murdered while pregnant. Some of these laws defining the fetus as being a person, "for the purpose of criminal prosecution of the offender" (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2008). Laci Peterson, murdered in 2002, is one of the more high-profile homicides.
Currently in the North Carolina Senate, a bill called the SB 353 Unborn Victims of Violence Act is being considered for legislation that would create a separate criminal offense for the death of a fetus when the mother is murdered. The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence does not support this law for numerous reasons including failure to see violence against the mother as the cause of the fetal death.[9] The Coalition does, however, support the position of the National Network to End Domestic Violence regarding the Unborn Victims of Violence Act.[citation
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.