
1162032 | Sep 09 / 01:46 PM | MLB |
STRAIGHT BET [1982] TOTAL u4½-115 (1H TOR BLUEJAYS (GM1) vrs 1H CHI WHITESOX (GM1)) ( A BURNETT -R / J VAZQUEZ -R |
Sep 09 / 02:05 PM |
1150/1000 |
1162032 | Sep 09 / 01:46 PM | MLB |
STRAIGHT BET [1982] TOTAL u4½-115 (1H TOR BLUEJAYS (GM1) vrs 1H CHI WHITESOX (GM1)) ( A BURNETT -R / J VAZQUEZ -R |
Sep 09 / 02:05 PM |
1150/1000 |
1162032 | Sep 09 / 01:46 PM | MLB |
STRAIGHT BET [1982] TOTAL u4½-115 (1H TOR BLUEJAYS (GM1) vrs 1H CHI WHITESOX (GM1)) ( A BURNETT -R / J VAZQUEZ -R |
Sep 09 / 02:05 PM |
1150/1000 |
That's why casinos keep expanding.
If you bet 1 unit on every dog at +money every day in MLB.
You would be 150 games under .500, but up over 106 units in profit.
There's truly no reason to cap MLB when all you have to do is take every dog.
Keep it simple.
That's why casinos keep expanding.
If you bet 1 unit on every dog at +money every day in MLB.
You would be 150 games under .500, but up over 106 units in profit.
There's truly no reason to cap MLB when all you have to do is take every dog.
Keep it simple.
That's why casinos keep expanding.
If you bet 1 unit on every dog at +money every day in MLB.
You would be 150 games under .500, but up over 106 units in profit.
There's truly no reason to cap MLB when all you have to do is take every dog.
Keep it simple.
That's why casinos keep expanding.
If you bet 1 unit on every dog at +money every day in MLB.
You would be 150 games under .500, but up over 106 units in profit.
There's truly no reason to cap MLB when all you have to do is take every dog.
Keep it simple.
That's why casinos keep expanding.
If you bet 1 unit on every dog at +money every day in MLB.
You would be 150 games under .500, but up over 106 units in profit.
There's truly no reason to cap MLB when all you have to do is take every dog.
Keep it simple.
This year.
That's why casinos keep expanding.
If you bet 1 unit on every dog at +money every day in MLB.
You would be 150 games under .500, but up over 106 units in profit.
There's truly no reason to cap MLB when all you have to do is take every dog.
Keep it simple.
This year.
It's not funny,it's tragic. I've been doing the same thing.(Being Selective)
Keep waiting for the DOG system to fall on it's ass,but it only stumbles for a second.
Then comes back strong and keeps churning out profits.
The poster Rickster2312 told me about the system during the NHL season.
Works in NHL too.
It's not funny,it's tragic. I've been doing the same thing.(Being Selective)
Keep waiting for the DOG system to fall on it's ass,but it only stumbles for a second.
Then comes back strong and keeps churning out profits.
The poster Rickster2312 told me about the system during the NHL season.
Works in NHL too.
Don't have the data for past years,but would think it's still the way to go.
You might not be up 100 units,but you would still be up.
Vegas needs dogs to win for them to make money.
Most of the public is scared shitless of dogs,they feel at ease taking the favorite.
Don't have the data for past years,but would think it's still the way to go.
You might not be up 100 units,but you would still be up.
Vegas needs dogs to win for them to make money.
Most of the public is scared shitless of dogs,they feel at ease taking the favorite.
Don't have the data for past years,but would think it's still the way to go.
You might not be up 100 units,but you would still be up.
Vegas needs dogs to win for them to make money.
Most of the public is scared shitless of dogs,they feel at ease taking the favorite.
Don't have the data for past years,but would think it's still the way to go.
You might not be up 100 units,but you would still be up.
Vegas needs dogs to win for them to make money.
Most of the public is scared shitless of dogs,they feel at ease taking the favorite.
I'm talking about blanket/blind betting all dogs. Yes you might eke out a wee profit over let's say a 5 year period but selective is still the more profitable.
I'm talking about blanket/blind betting all dogs. Yes you might eke out a wee profit over let's say a 5 year period but selective is still the more profitable.
I'm talking about blanket/blind betting all dogs. Yes you might eke out a wee profit over let's say a 5 year period but selective is still the more profitable.
I'm talking about blanket/blind betting all dogs. Yes you might eke out a wee profit over let's say a 5 year period but selective is still the more profitable.
I'm talking about blanket/blind betting all dogs. Yes you might eke out a wee profit over let's say a 5 year period but selective is still the more profitable.
Think the point of the system is the saving time from capping and decision making.
I'm talking about blanket/blind betting all dogs. Yes you might eke out a wee profit over let's say a 5 year period but selective is still the more profitable.
Think the point of the system is the saving time from capping and decision making.
Think the point of the system is the saving time from capping and decision making.
Think the point of the system is the saving time from capping and decision making.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.