Put Corey Schneider in.
Luongo is obviously shook and your team needs a good kick in the ass!
If you lose anyway then you go back to your so called saviour in game 6.
Put Corey Schneider in.
Luongo is obviously shook and your team needs a good kick in the ass!
If you lose anyway then you go back to your so called saviour in game 6.
Put Corey Schneider in.
Luongo is obviously shook and your team needs a good kick in the ass!
If you lose anyway then you go back to your so called saviour in game 6.
Hawks gaining some Mo
what if they steal this one it could really shake up the VaNucks
i tailed your O.T. play PB
LOTS OF HOCKEY LEFT IN THIS ONE
Hawks gaining some Mo
what if they steal this one it could really shake up the VaNucks
i tailed your O.T. play PB
LOTS OF HOCKEY LEFT IN THIS ONE
"Bobby LOU taking another POO on the ice"
side note. anyone else find Chicago broadcasters Pat Foley and Eddie Olczyk annoying. Foley YELLS his play-by-play throughout the game
"Bobby LOU taking another POO on the ice"
side note. anyone else find Chicago broadcasters Pat Foley and Eddie Olczyk annoying. Foley YELLS his play-by-play throughout the game
Corey Schneider has been great all year long. What is wrong with this tool behind Vancouvers bench? And still he leaves him in after a 3rd goal....
Looks like you tailed the wrong ot game outlaw...
Corey Schneider has been great all year long. What is wrong with this tool behind Vancouvers bench? And still he leaves him in after a 3rd goal....
Looks like you tailed the wrong ot game outlaw...
Put Corey Schneider in.
Luongo is obviously shook and your team needs a good kick in the ass!
If you lose anyway then you go back to your so called saviour in game 6.
Put Corey Schneider in.
Luongo is obviously shook and your team needs a good kick in the ass!
If you lose anyway then you go back to your so called saviour in game 6.
Put Corey Schneider in.
Luongo is obviously shook and your team needs a good kick in the ass!
If you lose anyway then you go back to your so called saviour in game 6.
I don't get the thinking. It was simple enough to me. Coaching 101.
Luongo may need a shrink after tonight
Put Corey Schneider in.
Luongo is obviously shook and your team needs a good kick in the ass!
If you lose anyway then you go back to your so called saviour in game 6.
I don't get the thinking. It was simple enough to me. Coaching 101.
Luongo may need a shrink after tonight
10-2 Chicago since Dave Bolland entered the series
also somewhat begs the question "did the Bhawks REALLY need to sign Brent Seabrook for 5.8 million starting next season"? seems like the Hawks really started playing after he got corked by Raffi Torres. "addition by subtraction"?
just think WHO Chicago could have retained from the Stanley Cup team IF they hadn't OVERPAID for Seabrook, Hossa and Kane. Campbell and Keith are two of the best D me in the league BUT 7.1 and 8.0 million each? that kind of $$$ buys a lot of Dustin Byfugliens, Andy Ladds, Brent Sopels, Ben Eagers and Antti Niemis
watch Stan Bowman trade Bolland in the off season for some slug because of "cap issues"
10-2 Chicago since Dave Bolland entered the series
also somewhat begs the question "did the Bhawks REALLY need to sign Brent Seabrook for 5.8 million starting next season"? seems like the Hawks really started playing after he got corked by Raffi Torres. "addition by subtraction"?
just think WHO Chicago could have retained from the Stanley Cup team IF they hadn't OVERPAID for Seabrook, Hossa and Kane. Campbell and Keith are two of the best D me in the league BUT 7.1 and 8.0 million each? that kind of $$$ buys a lot of Dustin Byfugliens, Andy Ladds, Brent Sopels, Ben Eagers and Antti Niemis
watch Stan Bowman trade Bolland in the off season for some slug because of "cap issues"
10-2 Chicago since Dave Bolland entered the series
also somewhat begs the question "did the Bhawks REALLY need to sign Brent Seabrook for 5.8 million starting next season"? seems like the Hawks really started playing after he got corked by Raffi Torres. "addition by subtraction"?
just think WHO Chicago could have retained from the Stanley Cup team IF they hadn't OVERPAID for Seabrook, Hossa and Kane. Campbell and Keith are two of the best D me in the league BUT 7.1 and 8.0 million each? that kind of $$$ buys a lot of Dustin Byfugliens, Andy Ladds, Brent Sopels, Ben Eagers and Antti Niemis
watch Stan Bowman trade Bolland in the off season for some slug because of "cap issues"
You do what you can to keep incredible players at great value like Byfuglien, Ladd and Madden.
I can't agree on Seabrook, he is great and how that hit has inspired that dressing room tells you just how important his boys think he is and what they think of him. Since the hit his partner Keith has been plain posessed along with the rest of the team to a slightly lesser degree.
10-2 Chicago since Dave Bolland entered the series
also somewhat begs the question "did the Bhawks REALLY need to sign Brent Seabrook for 5.8 million starting next season"? seems like the Hawks really started playing after he got corked by Raffi Torres. "addition by subtraction"?
just think WHO Chicago could have retained from the Stanley Cup team IF they hadn't OVERPAID for Seabrook, Hossa and Kane. Campbell and Keith are two of the best D me in the league BUT 7.1 and 8.0 million each? that kind of $$$ buys a lot of Dustin Byfugliens, Andy Ladds, Brent Sopels, Ben Eagers and Antti Niemis
watch Stan Bowman trade Bolland in the off season for some slug because of "cap issues"
You do what you can to keep incredible players at great value like Byfuglien, Ladd and Madden.
I can't agree on Seabrook, he is great and how that hit has inspired that dressing room tells you just how important his boys think he is and what they think of him. Since the hit his partner Keith has been plain posessed along with the rest of the team to a slightly lesser degree.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.