And so it begins. Will be in and out all weekend so getting this out now. Let's GO.
Boston vs Washington. 8 meetings for the season and each team won 4 times. AND...both each won 2 on the opposition's ice. O/U in the series was 5-2-1. Boston scored 26 goals (3.25/gm) and Washington scored 25 goals (3.12/gm). Boston was 6-4 their last 10 and Washington 7-3. Advantage Boston in net. Check Washington's IR- Oshie is a ?, Kuznetsov OUT, and Carlson is good to go (maybe).
Pens vs Isles. Pens were 6-2 in the 8 meetings this year, and Pens were 4-0 at home vs Isles this year. O/U in the series was 4-4. Interesting enough, 3 of the 4 unders were in Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh scored 26 goals (3.25/gm) and Isles scored 19 goals (2.37/gm). Isles were 3-7 their last 10 games and Pittsburgh was 8-2. Pittsburgh should be healthy except DeSmith injury. Advantage Pens offensively, Isles defensively.
Minnesota vs Vegas. Wild won 5 of the 8 meetings this year. Vegas only won ONCE in Minnesota. The O/U in the series was 4-4. Interesting enough, the Wild and the Knights each scored 24 goals (3.00/gm) in the series. Here is something I thought was interesting in my look...Wild last 10 was 5-5 BUT....in all 10 games they gave up 3 or more goals. Vegas was 7-3 last 10 games and scored 3 or more in 8 of those 10.
Tampa vs Florida. Florida won 5 of the 8 meetings this year, including 3 of 4 at home (there is a definite Lippsman split play). O/U was 5-2-1. Florida scored 31 goals (3.82/gm) while Tampa scored 24 goals (3.0/gm). Florida finished the last 10 games 8-2, scoring 3 or more in 8 of the 10, INCLUDING scoring 4 or more in the last 6 games. Tampa was 6-4 last 10 and allowed 3 or more in 5 of those 10. Interesting to see what Stammer and Kucherov will bring. Don't think the Cats will be intimidated.
Series bets: Bruins, Pens and Cats
Oh, I find it very, very strange that we have games Oil/Nucks and then Nucks/Flames on days the playoff starts. WHY freaking bother?
What do you want to talk about? GL
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Gentlemen and Jules
And so it begins. Will be in and out all weekend so getting this out now. Let's GO.
Boston vs Washington. 8 meetings for the season and each team won 4 times. AND...both each won 2 on the opposition's ice. O/U in the series was 5-2-1. Boston scored 26 goals (3.25/gm) and Washington scored 25 goals (3.12/gm). Boston was 6-4 their last 10 and Washington 7-3. Advantage Boston in net. Check Washington's IR- Oshie is a ?, Kuznetsov OUT, and Carlson is good to go (maybe).
Pens vs Isles. Pens were 6-2 in the 8 meetings this year, and Pens were 4-0 at home vs Isles this year. O/U in the series was 4-4. Interesting enough, 3 of the 4 unders were in Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh scored 26 goals (3.25/gm) and Isles scored 19 goals (2.37/gm). Isles were 3-7 their last 10 games and Pittsburgh was 8-2. Pittsburgh should be healthy except DeSmith injury. Advantage Pens offensively, Isles defensively.
Minnesota vs Vegas. Wild won 5 of the 8 meetings this year. Vegas only won ONCE in Minnesota. The O/U in the series was 4-4. Interesting enough, the Wild and the Knights each scored 24 goals (3.00/gm) in the series. Here is something I thought was interesting in my look...Wild last 10 was 5-5 BUT....in all 10 games they gave up 3 or more goals. Vegas was 7-3 last 10 games and scored 3 or more in 8 of those 10.
Tampa vs Florida. Florida won 5 of the 8 meetings this year, including 3 of 4 at home (there is a definite Lippsman split play). O/U was 5-2-1. Florida scored 31 goals (3.82/gm) while Tampa scored 24 goals (3.0/gm). Florida finished the last 10 games 8-2, scoring 3 or more in 8 of the 10, INCLUDING scoring 4 or more in the last 6 games. Tampa was 6-4 last 10 and allowed 3 or more in 5 of those 10. Interesting to see what Stammer and Kucherov will bring. Don't think the Cats will be intimidated.
Series bets: Bruins, Pens and Cats
Oh, I find it very, very strange that we have games Oil/Nucks and then Nucks/Flames on days the playoff starts. WHY freaking bother?
Hey guys. Been following different cappers... different sports... this one seems to be one of best... informative... non judgmental on ‘other’ topics... and highly accurate... I have not placed a wager off this info... just observing... appreciate this thread... I may actually look into hockey a bit and try to contribute... keep it up ... thanks.
1
Hey guys. Been following different cappers... different sports... this one seems to be one of best... informative... non judgmental on ‘other’ topics... and highly accurate... I have not placed a wager off this info... just observing... appreciate this thread... I may actually look into hockey a bit and try to contribute... keep it up ... thanks.
I believe with the split you need to be at least +120 to qualify and you almost will never see the home team as a dog in the playoff Game 1 on home ice. So...we are kind of in uncharthed territory here. IMO...take some of the big road dogs ( Preds...Blues...Habs...Thrashers...Wild ) for the split but otherwise...these teams have played each other sooooo much that we know the edges and angles. I don't think those will change too much in the playoffs for the first two rounds. These teams in their divisions this year know each other inside out and upside down.
Just my thoughts...like the regular season...it will likely not be normal.
Good luck everyone.
0
I believe with the split you need to be at least +120 to qualify and you almost will never see the home team as a dog in the playoff Game 1 on home ice. So...we are kind of in uncharthed territory here. IMO...take some of the big road dogs ( Preds...Blues...Habs...Thrashers...Wild ) for the split but otherwise...these teams have played each other sooooo much that we know the edges and angles. I don't think those will change too much in the playoffs for the first two rounds. These teams in their divisions this year know each other inside out and upside down.
Just my thoughts...like the regular season...it will likely not be normal.
Coin flip. 1. Like Rask over Vaneck. 2. Like the way the Bs played at the end compared to Caps. 3. F the Caps this time of year but I still am friends with Pirooz. I feel they'll split these first two games and I expect one to go over.
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
0
Coin flip. 1. Like Rask over Vaneck. 2. Like the way the Bs played at the end compared to Caps. 3. F the Caps this time of year but I still am friends with Pirooz. I feel they'll split these first two games and I expect one to go over.
Washbags are in a little trouble...Vanecek down and it looks like from my prospective more than just this game type injury. Anderson, then who after him? Oshie also left the bench.
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
1
Washbags are in a little trouble...Vanecek down and it looks like from my prospective more than just this game type injury. Anderson, then who after him? Oshie also left the bench.
It doesn't matter who is in net for Washington, if the B's only put 4 shots on net, Boo could stop those. No doubt that Washington is the better team through the first 2 periods.
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
0
It doesn't matter who is in net for Washington, if the B's only put 4 shots on net, Boo could stop those. No doubt that Washington is the better team through the first 2 periods.
Honestly, that is the way it should have ended. The Caps really dominated the game. B's didn't take advantage of having Anderson in net. Caps were more physical and just plain out wanted it more.
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
0
Honestly, that is the way it should have ended. The Caps really dominated the game. B's didn't take advantage of having Anderson in net. Caps were more physical and just plain out wanted it more.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.