The amount of destruction

That bad cappers have caused to the viewers have hurt the reputation of this great forum. I see these long writeups only for the outcome to go the complete opposite way. What a joke, records with a 50% ratio with a win/loss  is viewed as a decent capper, come on now...

Its easy to identify these CUCs (Covers' Unskilled Cappers) as well. They are volume betters and put in buzz words like LARGE and or have multiple paragraphs of theories and narratives. Come on man, end of the day, just go with your gut.

i dont follow any of these guys i handicap on my own winning every week leagally betting at local casino 

like tbf jmmy gape long write up that chargers d ranked dead last and o line was missing 2 guards 

but didnt mention wentz in paing non throwing shoulder and  vikings were hurting all over 

lucky me coudnt bet had no money in account called nephew  n son said yeah but only $50 told them why 

 Spot on 

@datboi86

 I agree with you as far as the hyperbole, super large max play nonsense, but I do appreciate a write up and do them myself, though not typically that long. I do appreciate knowing the reasons for plays and how people are thinking about things. The process is the most important part. Unless you only want to tail people what is the purpose of only posting a record and a play? It does nothing to help anyone. I rather enjoy a discussion to see if theres any angles we're missing or failing to consider. I appreciate if people tell me im wrong on my write up and why they think that. If i dont put up a write up of some kind theres nothing to talk about

@datboi86

By the same token, a pick without a reason is completely useless to me. Your gut feeling is not my gut feeling. I want to know why you are on a team or why else have a comments section at all? 

I know right. You will be hard pressed to find any winners with reasoning or not posted by OP so it's odd that he is talking all this mess.