All Forums | NFL Betting

Ravens +3.5 next week

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 12884
Posts: 183
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8218
Posted: #76
Every time I bet against the Steelers they kick my ass. I think I'll just watch this one from the penalty box..........
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2033
Posted: #77

Quote Originally Posted by ApocalypseLater:

yea they have to know by now this game should always be a pick'em no matter where it is played... especially without Troy...

gonna have to get on this before the line drops... Ravens are the most well-rounded team in the AFC, including the Pats...

 Lets see Pitt should of beat them in the first game with their #3 QB and the cheep shot Raven coulsn't even beat a QB with a broken nose and all the cheepshot they gave out . I'm aall over Pitt in this one their going to be alittle upset over the last game . So tell us why the Raven are the most well rounded team in the AFC most of their wins was by luck and cheatting

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2033
Posted: #78
Everyone jumping on the Ravens bandwagon because the beat a team yesterday that realy shouldn't of been in the playoffs ' They played all soso teams and if Cassel didn't play like shit with 3 ints I seen the Ravens losing . The Cheifs fell apart they couldn't handle the pressure of the playoffs. How many sacks did KC have 4 just think what a well rested #1 D is going to do
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3181
Posted: #79
Quote Originally Posted by Sharp__Action:


Agree, stuckey.

Ravens were my favorite bet last week, they are this week again, also. The idea of getting 3.5 in a low-scoring, close game is sexy to me.

Ravens have more balance on offense + better passing game/receivers.
3.5 is huge in this rivalry for sure.. But better offense...
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 9261
Posted: #80
Disqualified....

This isn't a response.

classic

Neither is this

fukn hilarious, really....this is fukn hilarious.........

And neither is that.

Gee, I wonder why that is?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 748
Posted: #81
Quote Originally Posted by Stuckey:



classic

Why?

He said he thought the Ravens were going to win straight up.  At the same time he was getting 3.5, he should have put his ML wager down since it would be slightly better payout.  So 14daroad is right.

Also I think if you bet the Ravens that getting 3.5 down early before the line moved was the correct call though I doubt it will make a difference in the game since the outright winner of playoff games are the ATS winner.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 21313
Posted: #82
I can't believe what I am reading in this thread.  Such square statements.  I'm done here.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 73
Posted: #83
The Steelers will not lose this game.  The Ravens cannot beat Ben.. he is 6-0 in last 6 vs. Ravens.  Next. The Steelers are a superior team who had the Ravens beaten with their #3 QB until the last minute of the game.. They beat them by 23-14 in Pittsburgh in 2008...That scores sounds about right for this game too.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 9139
Posted: #84

Somebody mentioned luck..Kinda like Stevie Johnson dropping a wide open TD pass in Buffalo.  History says the Steelers win this game for sure but Pitt fans are a little  understandably

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 956
Posted: #85
I would have jumped on the 3.5 without thinking.  People that don't see the potential value in that are just morons.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 163
Posted: #86
Balt. + points=
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1737
Posted: #87
Baltimore is the square play, keep thinking you are getting "value"



Then you'll be crying after the game how the refs are always on Pitt.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 10395
Posted: #88

last 4 between these two have been decided by a FG.

Laying -3.5 with PITT seems crazy.

I like the RAVENs here too, BOL

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 956
Posted: #89
Quote Originally Posted by ozzwald:

last 4 between these two have been decided by a FG.

Laying -3.5 with PITT seems crazy.

I like the RAVENs here too, BOL

What he said. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5202
Posted: #90
stuck, not to say anything against your play here, but I've never seen you go against your ravens.  Am I mistaken at all?  Have you ever bet against them in the last few years? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 50021
Posted: #91
That 23-14 playoff game was 16-14 until Troy picked it off and ran it back for a TD late in that game......The Ravens respect the Steelers,no doubt..but fear them,don't think so......Great game comin up @ the Ketchup bottle....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #92
Nothing more square than overreacting to an opening line.

They usually get all the puttz with the suckers line - hey, you can even get an extra half point so if they lose by a FG, you can still cover.

Yeah, those usually work out well.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #93
Quote Originally Posted by Niners13:

Baltimore is the square play, keep thinking you are getting "value"



Then you'll be crying after the game how the refs are always on Pitt.


Hey, someone who doesn't overreact after one game.




 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 9139
Posted: #94
Thats true Shrimp. The Ravens were totally dominated in that game and somehow still had a chance to win in the 4th.  We always seem to make that fatal error against Pittsburgh late in the game. Lets get the win this time
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 927
Posted: #95
Quote Originally Posted by Stuckey:

I can't believe what I am reading in this thread.  Such square statements.  I'm done here.


What do you expect? This is Covers for Christ's sake.....why dont you bring your talents to CTG?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #96
Because that site is filled with shit too. The square statements are anything coming from anyone who jumped on the Ravens.

They didnt even need to dangle that half out there, but sucked in a lot by doing so.

Cappingthegame is filled with fuckwads who cant cap.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 9261
Posted: #97
I can't believe what I am reading in this thread.  Such square statements.  I'm done here.

Actually, you can't explain why betting a game on a line that is still available. 6 days before kickoff is a good idea.


And again, there have been 4 playoff games in 2010 and the spread has not mattered. Additionally, in 2010 the Steelers and Ravens have played twice and the spread has not mattered.

Finally, the last two time the Ravens played @ Pittsburgh in the playoffs they lost 24-13 and 27-10. The Steelers covered both, and so good luck with your early bet on a line that is still available.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 9261
Posted: #98
last 4 between these two have been decided by a FG.

Yes, and the underdog has won outright in the last 2.

Also, the Steelers have never lost a playoff game to the Ravens, and they are 8-1 in their past nine wild-card or divisional playoff games at home, including 4-1 at Heinz Field.


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 956
Posted: #99
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:

last 4 between these two have been decided by a FG.

Yes, and the underdog has won outright in the last 2.

Also, the Steelers have never lost a playoff game to the Ravens, and they are 8-1 in their past nine wild-card or divisional playoff games at home, including 4-1 at Heinz Field.


And what happened before is always what happens again.  That's what makes gambling so freaking easy!!!

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 9261
Posted: #100
And what happened before is always what happens again

So why are you so gung ho on the +3.5???
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.