Anyone catch the beginning of McAfee show

I missed it but they did a segment on the horrible officiating I think,? And the need for full time refs 

It is getting bad bad. These old fucks are corrupt

A lot of the controversial calls are done by the replay guys back in the NFL HQ on Park Avenue. 

They ARE the full time refs you've been waiting for and they stink. 

And why do you think that is? Do they stink, or is there more behind it?????? How can you screw up replay????? 

@LTsCrazedDog

 they INTENTIONALLY stink. 

@Tressel33

 can you say it a lil louder for the naive ppl in the back?? 

There was weird goings ons with the replay last night and they reviewed a challenge on Detroit. Made a ruling

Then came back with "on a second look .."

Where there is large amounts of money there is more possibilities of corruption. This message is brought to you by proud partner of NFL draft Kings the crown is yours 

if its fixed,its just like its not fixed,pick the right side and grow pair

@calicappin

 I am old and slow and you Sir are wise so lets use your example of the "second look" case you brought up.. (By the way he was short not that close of call) but I move on.. You say the money dictates some calls for the "book" ... First off if any  gambler needs  a book to point out the "public" play on a game and they don't know that themselves  on 90% of games they  are not very astute.. Not that hard to figure out not splitting the atom here..  In last night games no clear cut fav on the game it was going to be spit at most books... easy call... The easy call was the books would need UNDER... As in many games but especially last night... So if that the case (and it is).. Why ? Why ? if being 'fixed" for the books  would the "second look" as you put it overwhelming favor the over for so many obvious reasons.. Hoping I do not have to explain all those .. ie short field to high power offense ...ect.. (there are 3 more valid reason that called helped the over)...but lets move on wise one.. To recap the "second look" call exposed the books to their highest liability  on the board.. But you claim fix for the book...hmm..  interesting.. horse shat... Money or tin foil hat you decide in this case (as in most) you decide.. I vote tin foil hat in this 'second look"" case.. 

@ArtSchlichterJr

 Oh dear     

@ArtSchlichterJr

 People (myself included) have bitched for years that replay needed to be more involved in solving some of these tricky, close call situations. Now when the refs review a play and then go back and take a “second look” to confirm the right outcome, people yell fix! Fix! Some people just can’t be satisfied!