Funny how the station thought it was newsworthy but then ends the story saying that Bet MGM "refused' to explain why they stiffed the guy. Another win for big biz
Funny how the station thought it was newsworthy but then ends the story saying that Bet MGM "refused' to explain why they stiffed the guy. Another win for big biz
Not sure what the best were but those odds for what looked like a 4 leg parlay was obviously an error. He even said he asked someone at BetMGM to review it before he placed it which means he likely caught something as well.
Having said that, BetMGN ought to pay him something even at the corrected odds. My guess is he will get something like the other guy now that it is going public. Even a couple hundred grand payout is worth avoiding the hit on their reputation
Not sure what the best were but those odds for what looked like a 4 leg parlay was obviously an error. He even said he asked someone at BetMGM to review it before he placed it which means he likely caught something as well.
Having said that, BetMGN ought to pay him something even at the corrected odds. My guess is he will get something like the other guy now that it is going public. Even a couple hundred grand payout is worth avoiding the hit on their reputation
It got reviewed and accepted, and it was a 6leg parlay but yeah he should get paid what the "correct" odds would of been.
It got reviewed and accepted, and it was a 6leg parlay but yeah he should get paid what the "correct" odds would of been.
@MIZARD
I wonder why with all the AI out there that they don't catch these obvious way off errors sooner. But as long as the book canceled the bets we'll before the game tipped off then it is acceptable. I suppose they can't start a precedence paying bettors for betting into obvious line errors even as a goodwill measure and even though it ain't no skin off their assholes.
@MIZARD
I wonder why with all the AI out there that they don't catch these obvious way off errors sooner. But as long as the book canceled the bets we'll before the game tipped off then it is acceptable. I suppose they can't start a precedence paying bettors for betting into obvious line errors even as a goodwill measure and even though it ain't no skin off their assholes.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.