NBA FINALS - Game 4

Question

The more I see people on the forum, intelligent people, backing OKC, or even people I would expect to be on Pacers holding off, the more I say BULLSHIT. "The gambler's greatest tool is his intuition."

Ind. + points (1.4X) (1 unit for me is normal sized, 2u large) - waiting for a better number than 6, think there may be a rash of public money closer to post.

This game "looks" like an Indiana cover and a OKC win. I'm even questioning the latter. When I lock in the best number I feel I can get ATS, I'm going to swallow hard and make a small play on:

Ind. ML (0.3X)

BOL to all.

Stew Baker · Answer

The more I see people on the forum, intelligent people, backing OKC, or even people I would expect to be on Pacers holding off, the more I say BULLSHIT. "The gambler's greatest tool is his intuition."

Ind. + points (1.4X) (1 unit for me is normal sized, 2u large) - waiting for a better number than 6, think there may be a rash of public money closer to post.

This game "looks" like an Indiana cover and a OKC win. I'm even questioning the latter. When I lock in the best number I feel I can get ATS, I'm going to swallow hard and make a small play on:

Ind. ML (0.3X)

BOL to all.

Stew Baker · Answer

Late OKC money doesn&#x27;t seem to be materializing. Took &#x2B;6 -105 (BOL) which was better than the other numbers I had access to. Reduced the bet a tad to 1.2 u because I didn&#x27;t get the line value I was hoping for. Took &#x2B;204 on the ML.&#xA;Final card:&#xA;Ind. &#x2B;6 -105 (BOL) (1.2X)&#xA;Ind. &#x2B;204 (0.3X)

Macwestie1 · Answer

@Stew Baker

NBA FINALS - Game 4

Hot Forum Topics