I'm not accusing you of anything, I thought you said yourself that you were 6-2 but went 9-2 including the plays from kalind, if your system is 9-2 say 9-2, sheesh.
I didn't post my over / unders in the NFL but I went 3-0 on sunday. GB/Chi under, Indy/Ten under, and Pitt/Clev Over( it was posted by Kalind, so maybe not count it )
I'm not mad - sorry if it came off that way. I didn't post those three. We could go two different ways 10 - 3 or 8 - 3. . . what do you guys think I should post for tomorrow then?
I'm not accusing you of anything, I thought you said yourself that you were 6-2 but went 9-2 including the plays from kalind, if your system is 9-2 say 9-2, sheesh.
I didn't post my over / unders in the NFL but I went 3-0 on sunday. GB/Chi under, Indy/Ten under, and Pitt/Clev Over( it was posted by Kalind, so maybe not count it )
I'm not mad - sorry if it came off that way. I didn't post those three. We could go two different ways 10 - 3 or 8 - 3. . . what do you guys think I should post for tomorrow then?
Well did you pick those, or was it part of your system? Don't combine the two like your system picked them when it didn't.
If you want to go ahead and say overall 9-2 system 6-2 or whatever it is.
Post whatever your system picks, I think I speak for everyone when I say you are confusing the hell out of us when you post some stuff from your 'system' and some other stuff from god knows where. We just want to know your standard deviation plays, and if you want to track the over-under system (if its different I don't even know any more) post it as well but clarify which plays are under which system.
Well did you pick those, or was it part of your system? Don't combine the two like your system picked them when it didn't.
If you want to go ahead and say overall 9-2 system 6-2 or whatever it is.
Post whatever your system picks, I think I speak for everyone when I say you are confusing the hell out of us when you post some stuff from your 'system' and some other stuff from god knows where. We just want to know your standard deviation plays, and if you want to track the over-under system (if its different I don't even know any more) post it as well but clarify which plays are under which system.
wasn't Dallas a play in the NHL last week? That lost...
also can you please explain how memphis qualified as a fade?
Dallas was a play? against who?
Memphis fade was a mistake, and I'm very sorry for that. I may have miscalculated their previous loss as 37 instead of 27. 101 - 74 = 27. I can't think of why else I would have made that mistake.
Again, I do apologize to my followers, tailer, and friends.
I'll make extra sure before I post the plays from now on : (
wasn't Dallas a play in the NHL last week? That lost...
also can you please explain how memphis qualified as a fade?
Dallas was a play? against who?
Memphis fade was a mistake, and I'm very sorry for that. I may have miscalculated their previous loss as 37 instead of 27. 101 - 74 = 27. I can't think of why else I would have made that mistake.
Again, I do apologize to my followers, tailer, and friends.
I'll make extra sure before I post the plays from now on : (
Well did you pick those, or was it part of your system? Don't combine the two like your system picked them when it didn't.
If you want to go ahead and say overall 9-2 system 6-2 or whatever it is.
Post whatever your system picks, I think I speak for everyone when I say you are confusing the hell out of us when you post some stuff from your 'system' and some other stuff from god knows where. We just want to know your standard deviation plays, and if you want to track the over-under system (if its different I don't even know any more) post it as well but clarify which plays are under which system.
Understood. Good idea; I'll label the play from now on as: STDEV PT swing, Back to back Fade, and totals regression.
Well did you pick those, or was it part of your system? Don't combine the two like your system picked them when it didn't.
If you want to go ahead and say overall 9-2 system 6-2 or whatever it is.
Post whatever your system picks, I think I speak for everyone when I say you are confusing the hell out of us when you post some stuff from your 'system' and some other stuff from god knows where. We just want to know your standard deviation plays, and if you want to track the over-under system (if its different I don't even know any more) post it as well but clarify which plays are under which system.
Understood. Good idea; I'll label the play from now on as: STDEV PT swing, Back to back Fade, and totals regression.
Tafter, Ive been watching your plays for the "system" the past couple days and I must say I'm impressed! I was a bit skeptical today and did not tail. However, tomorrow I will be following your plays. Thanks and keep up the system.
Tafter, Ive been watching your plays for the "system" the past couple days and I must say I'm impressed! I was a bit skeptical today and did not tail. However, tomorrow I will be following your plays. Thanks and keep up the system.
Well did you pick those, or was it part of your system? Don't combine the two like your system picked them when it didn't.
If you want to go ahead and say overall 9-2 system 6-2 or whatever it is.
Post whatever your system picks, I think I speak for everyone when I say you are confusing the hell out of us when you post some stuff from your 'system' and some other stuff from god knows where. We just want to know your standard deviation plays, and if you want to track the over-under system (if its different I don't even know any more) post it as well but clarify which plays are under which system.
There are 3 plays........ Just to reiterate
BACK to BACK ST DEV on both sides - Dan Gordon
5 ST DEV SWING - Dan Gordon
Total Regression - Harry J Misner
the total regression was the least explained so far. . . here it is.....
when the two teams about to play have totals in their previous game as a TD or lower for both teams' previous games, take the OVER
likewise take the under if both when a td or more in each of their previous game.
I've applied the same strategy in NHL, win tonight and NCAAB, win tonight.
I simply made a mistake when I saw OKC prev game, they lost by 27 NOT 37. I really do apologize for it, and we're gonna steamroll the rest of the week, no problem.
Well did you pick those, or was it part of your system? Don't combine the two like your system picked them when it didn't.
If you want to go ahead and say overall 9-2 system 6-2 or whatever it is.
Post whatever your system picks, I think I speak for everyone when I say you are confusing the hell out of us when you post some stuff from your 'system' and some other stuff from god knows where. We just want to know your standard deviation plays, and if you want to track the over-under system (if its different I don't even know any more) post it as well but clarify which plays are under which system.
There are 3 plays........ Just to reiterate
BACK to BACK ST DEV on both sides - Dan Gordon
5 ST DEV SWING - Dan Gordon
Total Regression - Harry J Misner
the total regression was the least explained so far. . . here it is.....
when the two teams about to play have totals in their previous game as a TD or lower for both teams' previous games, take the OVER
likewise take the under if both when a td or more in each of their previous game.
I've applied the same strategy in NHL, win tonight and NCAAB, win tonight.
I simply made a mistake when I saw OKC prev game, they lost by 27 NOT 37. I really do apologize for it, and we're gonna steamroll the rest of the week, no problem.
Tafter, sorry wasn't around for most of evening. You missed a play that won today. ARK/TEX under.
shoot...
Vegas....you're the most educated on what we're looking for .... can you help me find these gems tomorrow? I look every night, but I can miss one now an again. Hell, I subtracted wrong too.
Another Idea....NBA fan, can you double check my numbers on these posts too? LOL I am serious though. I am human.
2-1 either way we slice it, is a good night....don't tell me you guys didn't join me in NHL. .
Look I havn't watched a hockey game all year, but if there's a way to apply these strategies from the NFL to NHL using statistics and mean regression, we'll never need someone write a book on hockey. We can just copy the winners from football and I can continue to mathematically translate them for us! No problem.
Tafter, sorry wasn't around for most of evening. You missed a play that won today. ARK/TEX under.
shoot...
Vegas....you're the most educated on what we're looking for .... can you help me find these gems tomorrow? I look every night, but I can miss one now an again. Hell, I subtracted wrong too.
Another Idea....NBA fan, can you double check my numbers on these posts too? LOL I am serious though. I am human.
2-1 either way we slice it, is a good night....don't tell me you guys didn't join me in NHL. .
Look I havn't watched a hockey game all year, but if there's a way to apply these strategies from the NFL to NHL using statistics and mean regression, we'll never need someone write a book on hockey. We can just copy the winners from football and I can continue to mathematically translate them for us! No problem.
Tafter, Ive been watching your plays for the "system" the past couple days and I must say I'm impressed! I was a bit skeptical today and did not tail. However, tomorrow I will be following your plays. Thanks and keep up the system.
I'm glad to help. I love playing the games, and I love math. why not make $ and help other make $.
Tafter, Ive been watching your plays for the "system" the past couple days and I must say I'm impressed! I was a bit skeptical today and did not tail. However, tomorrow I will be following your plays. Thanks and keep up the system.
I'm glad to help. I love playing the games, and I love math. why not make $ and help other make $.
just to tell you about the OKC/MEMPHIS game... saw a thread about after beating the lakers, teams cover the spread(9-1) or SU. very interesting find, wish i remembered which user posted it.
look i know you told me rockets over wasnt a play... but i saw same thing today with spurs game over... both teams score low previous game and then they set a real high O/U not making sense by looking at their last game. but as you see, they go over.
just to tell you about the OKC/MEMPHIS game... saw a thread about after beating the lakers, teams cover the spread(9-1) or SU. very interesting find, wish i remembered which user posted it.
look i know you told me rockets over wasnt a play... but i saw same thing today with spurs game over... both teams score low previous game and then they set a real high O/U not making sense by looking at their last game. but as you see, they go over.
just to tell you about the OKC/MEMPHIS game... saw a thread about after beating the lakers, teams cover the spread(9-1) or SU. very interesting find, wish i remembered which user posted it.
look i know you told me rockets over wasnt a play... but i saw same thing today with spurs game over... both teams score low previous game and then they set a real high O/U not making sense by looking at their last game. but as you see, they go over.
nice finds.....I try to find a 180 or lower for both teams prev score to take an over and and under if both teams are 215 or more for the previous game
good heads up on the lakers. again, I've mentioned it above, but OKC was a mistake altogether as the swing was 46 not 56. I miscalculated, and I do sincerely feel bad we all took that hit. otherwise, it was an NHL night only unless your book was going to take the ND Uconn total
just to tell you about the OKC/MEMPHIS game... saw a thread about after beating the lakers, teams cover the spread(9-1) or SU. very interesting find, wish i remembered which user posted it.
look i know you told me rockets over wasnt a play... but i saw same thing today with spurs game over... both teams score low previous game and then they set a real high O/U not making sense by looking at their last game. but as you see, they go over.
nice finds.....I try to find a 180 or lower for both teams prev score to take an over and and under if both teams are 215 or more for the previous game
good heads up on the lakers. again, I've mentioned it above, but OKC was a mistake altogether as the swing was 46 not 56. I miscalculated, and I do sincerely feel bad we all took that hit. otherwise, it was an NHL night only unless your book was going to take the ND Uconn total
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.