@LAGameofInches
Was the baseball flying or was the twins pitching an absolute disgrace? Like if you walk 9 batters what do you expect.
Mets under hit twice. McNeil ball didnt fly was a line drive. Nats didnt come close to hitting a hr.
I'll respond b/c I watched the game. The ball was flying (6 homers doesn't happen if the ball doesn't "fly") AND the Twins pitchers were disgraceful. I also stated the umpire was "squeezing the strike zone" which if you look back at how many walks there were, was actually taking place. Crazy how some blatant strikes were called balls but it seems to be constant around the league.
I also wrote about how much the F5 in Mets game made sense (post 19) as well as silencing someone crying saying that the game might end up with 7 total runs (I stated 6-1 or 5-2) which all happened (post 28).
Obviously you and I have a lot of great dialogue for many years so I'm not taking it as an attack and I know you weren't either, just frustrated. But, I'm not wrong about what I stated either. Yes, the Twins pitchers sucked and yes the umpire sucked so together it wasn't even possible to get to the window on that game.
@LAGameofInchesI
I'll go with what I always say. Twins got 3 runs. Rangers scored 16. So if you look at that you think if the twins are held to 3 maybe it pushes. Ober was flat out awful today and essentially was throwing meatballs. He had zilch. O could of hit hrs against them today.
Never the less was a bad pmay that a number of us were on so
Established in 1995,
5 runs
Watch out BC is back 
Hot Forum Topics
