Clemsons defense completely controled GTs option attack, which tells me they are playing with discipline, which means they should be able to capably defend Jacksons read option...not sure about the opening line, but if oddsmakers are dumb enough to make clem a home dog, i will be hammering the tigers there.....and im a gamecock fan.
Clemsons defense completely controled GTs option attack, which tells me they are playing with discipline, which means they should be able to capably defend Jacksons read option...not sure about the opening line, but if oddsmakers are dumb enough to make clem a home dog, i will be hammering the tigers there.....and im a gamecock fan.
win or lose, Louisville will find the Clemson D very challenging......the days of 700 yds and 50 points will be over on that night......
Truer words have never been spoken on Covers. Hoping the 'Ville goes bonkers once more tomorrow night to solidify that 2.5 to 3 that people are referencing. Watson will remind everyone that he is the best player in college football, not LJ.
win or lose, Louisville will find the Clemson D very challenging......the days of 700 yds and 50 points will be over on that night......
Truer words have never been spoken on Covers. Hoping the 'Ville goes bonkers once more tomorrow night to solidify that 2.5 to 3 that people are referencing. Watson will remind everyone that he is the best player in college football, not LJ.
You're so far off it's comical. Louisville will not open a favorite on the road to Clemson. It will be Clemson -3 more than likely.
Read what I wrote you low IQ square:
"I could see Louisville -3 with books hoping to attract Clemson money.
If
books make Clemson the favorite, everyone will hammer Louisville. So
giving Clemson a FG at home would balance the action a lot more."
As I said, sharps would be ALL OVER Louisville if Clemson was made the favorite. And what has happened? Books have been DESTROYED with Louisville money and the Cardinals are now the favorite!
That is NOT the goal of bookmaking and my response was about who should be the favorite so that EVEN ACTION would come in on both sides. Do you understand that concept or are you too stupid?
Books have made a TERRIBLE mistake here and the sharps have made them pay. Books are now at an extremely HIGH RISK for taking a BATH on this game.
Do not reply to me again on this board without understanding what you've read in response to the question. I decided to go ahead and destroy you here once as a warning, do not make me do it again.
You're so far off it's comical. Louisville will not open a favorite on the road to Clemson. It will be Clemson -3 more than likely.
Read what I wrote you low IQ square:
"I could see Louisville -3 with books hoping to attract Clemson money.
If
books make Clemson the favorite, everyone will hammer Louisville. So
giving Clemson a FG at home would balance the action a lot more."
As I said, sharps would be ALL OVER Louisville if Clemson was made the favorite. And what has happened? Books have been DESTROYED with Louisville money and the Cardinals are now the favorite!
That is NOT the goal of bookmaking and my response was about who should be the favorite so that EVEN ACTION would come in on both sides. Do you understand that concept or are you too stupid?
Books have made a TERRIBLE mistake here and the sharps have made them pay. Books are now at an extremely HIGH RISK for taking a BATH on this game.
Do not reply to me again on this board without understanding what you've read in response to the question. I decided to go ahead and destroy you here once as a warning, do not make me do it again.
"I could see Louisville -3 with books hoping to attract Clemson money.
If
books make Clemson the favorite, everyone will hammer Louisville. So
giving Clemson a FG at home would balance the action a lot more."
As I said, sharps would be ALL OVER Louisville if Clemson was made the favorite. And what has happened? Books have been DESTROYED with Louisville money and the Cardinals are now the favorite!
That is NOT the goal of bookmaking and my response was about who should be the favorite so that EVEN ACTION would come in on both sides. Do you understand that concept or are you too stupid?
Books have made a TERRIBLE mistake here and the sharps have made them pay. Books are now at an extremely HIGH RISK for taking a BATH on this game.
Do not reply to me again on this board without understanding what you've read in response to the question. I decided to go ahead and destroy you here once as a warning, do not make me do it again.
"I could see Louisville -3 with books hoping to attract Clemson money.
If
books make Clemson the favorite, everyone will hammer Louisville. So
giving Clemson a FG at home would balance the action a lot more."
As I said, sharps would be ALL OVER Louisville if Clemson was made the favorite. And what has happened? Books have been DESTROYED with Louisville money and the Cardinals are now the favorite!
That is NOT the goal of bookmaking and my response was about who should be the favorite so that EVEN ACTION would come in on both sides. Do you understand that concept or are you too stupid?
Books have made a TERRIBLE mistake here and the sharps have made them pay. Books are now at an extremely HIGH RISK for taking a BATH on this game.
Do not reply to me again on this board without understanding what you've read in response to the question. I decided to go ahead and destroy you here once as a warning, do not make me do it again.
"I could see Louisville -3 with books hoping to attract Clemson money.
If
books make Clemson the favorite, everyone will hammer Louisville. So
giving Clemson a FG at home would balance the action a lot more."
As I said, sharps would be ALL OVER Louisville if Clemson was made the favorite. And what has happened? Books have been DESTROYED with Louisville money and the Cardinals are now the favorite!
That is NOT the goal of bookmaking and my response was about who should be the favorite so that EVEN ACTION would come in on both sides. Do you understand that concept or are you too stupid?
Books have made a TERRIBLE mistake here and the sharps have made them pay. Books are now at an extremely HIGH RISK for taking a BATH on this game.
Do not reply to me again on this board without understanding what you've read in response to the question. I decided to go ahead and destroy you here once as a warning, do not make me do it again.
I fully understand the concept of wanting to attract even action, the simple fact is that is not what happens most of the time. However, you still stated that you could see the linemakers opening up Louisville -3, and that was NEVER going to happen. 3 is a key number, and whoever they opened as a favorite was going to take the money from the "sharp" side regardless, and it certainly would not have been the home team in this case.
"I could see Louisville -3 with books hoping to attract Clemson money.
If
books make Clemson the favorite, everyone will hammer Louisville. So
giving Clemson a FG at home would balance the action a lot more."
As I said, sharps would be ALL OVER Louisville if Clemson was made the favorite. And what has happened? Books have been DESTROYED with Louisville money and the Cardinals are now the favorite!
That is NOT the goal of bookmaking and my response was about who should be the favorite so that EVEN ACTION would come in on both sides. Do you understand that concept or are you too stupid?
Books have made a TERRIBLE mistake here and the sharps have made them pay. Books are now at an extremely HIGH RISK for taking a BATH on this game.
Do not reply to me again on this board without understanding what you've read in response to the question. I decided to go ahead and destroy you here once as a warning, do not make me do it again.
I fully understand the concept of wanting to attract even action, the simple fact is that is not what happens most of the time. However, you still stated that you could see the linemakers opening up Louisville -3, and that was NEVER going to happen. 3 is a key number, and whoever they opened as a favorite was going to take the money from the "sharp" side regardless, and it certainly would not have been the home team in this case.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.