Not sure about Thursday NIT Final of GW vs. Valpo (slight lean GW +2.5 or higher) and Friday CBI Final of Nevada @ Morehead (guess line of 3 for Morehead, but Nevada is the better team) Still would take Morehead at 2 or less due to home court advantage and revenge theory.
However, thoughts for Final 4:
Oklahoma +3 (-120) for 5* - Already played for 5*, but can buy back the other way with Nova ML or Nova at the -1..5 I expected by me at tip. I think the game is a pure tossup as Hield can't be super hot forever, but love Kruger and think this might be his year finally. Love to hear good opinions supporting Nova, but KU should have beaten them and OU should have a good shot with their guards matching up very well and Hield being the game's superstar!
North Carolina -9 vs Syracuse for 5* - Already played as line isn't going lower so would be a hedge if I switched, but Cuse is a true cinderella and realize this crap can happen. However, this appears to be a beat down waiting to happen IMHO. Cuse shocked Virginia with 29-8 run, but UNC has a week to prepare and they have an excellent shot to win Roy's 3rd title since 20005 IMO. Cuse is not the 2003 club with Carmelo and Jerry Mc, etc... heck they're not even a solid club, but faced a favorable path to Final 4 and got hot vs UVA for the final 8 or 9 minutes. I think this will be a thorough 15 to 20 point beat down as a weak to hear about how great you are, etc isn't going to help, along with the fact you are so happy to be here. Just my thoughts!
Not sure about Thursday NIT Final of GW vs. Valpo (slight lean GW +2.5 or higher) and Friday CBI Final of Nevada @ Morehead (guess line of 3 for Morehead, but Nevada is the better team) Still would take Morehead at 2 or less due to home court advantage and revenge theory.
However, thoughts for Final 4:
Oklahoma +3 (-120) for 5* - Already played for 5*, but can buy back the other way with Nova ML or Nova at the -1..5 I expected by me at tip. I think the game is a pure tossup as Hield can't be super hot forever, but love Kruger and think this might be his year finally. Love to hear good opinions supporting Nova, but KU should have beaten them and OU should have a good shot with their guards matching up very well and Hield being the game's superstar!
North Carolina -9 vs Syracuse for 5* - Already played as line isn't going lower so would be a hedge if I switched, but Cuse is a true cinderella and realize this crap can happen. However, this appears to be a beat down waiting to happen IMHO. Cuse shocked Virginia with 29-8 run, but UNC has a week to prepare and they have an excellent shot to win Roy's 3rd title since 20005 IMO. Cuse is not the 2003 club with Carmelo and Jerry Mc, etc... heck they're not even a solid club, but faced a favorable path to Final 4 and got hot vs UVA for the final 8 or 9 minutes. I think this will be a thorough 15 to 20 point beat down as a weak to hear about how great you are, etc isn't going to help, along with the fact you are so happy to be here. Just my thoughts!
I think the football stadium is going to effect Hield's shooting. He doesn't have mid range game so it will be difficult for him to find points if threes are not dropping.
I think the football stadium is going to effect Hield's shooting. He doesn't have mid range game so it will be difficult for him to find points if threes are not dropping.
Agree with Carolina but I think nova is playing so well right now and have the defense to limit hield and I also agree the stadium factor it doesn't bode well for teams that rely on the outside shot.
Agree with Carolina but I think nova is playing so well right now and have the defense to limit hield and I also agree the stadium factor it doesn't bode well for teams that rely on the outside shot.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.