HOWEVER AGAINST MARQUETTE WHO IN THEIR LAST 5 HAVE PLAYED SOFT D ALLOWING OPPONENTS TO SHOOT WAY ABOVE AVERAGE IN ALL CATEGORIES WVU WILL HIT SOME SHOTS AND WHEN THEY DONT, EXPECT THE MOUNTIES TO HAVE MANY 2ND CHANCE OPPORTUNITIES.
So by "way above average" you mean that Marquette actually held their last two opponents (UConn and Rutgers) UNDER their season shooting %.
Just because you use all capital letters doesn't make what you write accurate
HOWEVER AGAINST MARQUETTE WHO IN THEIR LAST 5 HAVE PLAYED SOFT D ALLOWING OPPONENTS TO SHOOT WAY ABOVE AVERAGE IN ALL CATEGORIES WVU WILL HIT SOME SHOTS AND WHEN THEY DONT, EXPECT THE MOUNTIES TO HAVE MANY 2ND CHANCE OPPORTUNITIES.
So by "way above average" you mean that Marquette actually held their last two opponents (UConn and Rutgers) UNDER their season shooting %.
Just because you use all capital letters doesn't make what you write accurate
So by "way above average" you mean that Marquette actually held their last two opponents (UConn and Rutgers) UNDER their season shooting %.
Just because you use all capital letters doesn't make what you write accurate
WHY DONT YOU CLICK ON THE MATCHUP OF THE GAME ON COVERS AND THEN CLICK ON LAST 5 IN DEPTH AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
So by "way above average" you mean that Marquette actually held their last two opponents (UConn and Rutgers) UNDER their season shooting %.
Just because you use all capital letters doesn't make what you write accurate
WHY DONT YOU CLICK ON THE MATCHUP OF THE GAME ON COVERS AND THEN CLICK ON LAST 5 IN DEPTH AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
Field Goal % FG Made FG Attempts | 49.2 29.0 59.0 | 45.6 27.8 61.0 | 43.5 23.6 54.2 | ||
3 Point % 3P Made 3PAttempts | 34.2 5.4 15.8 | 38.0 6.0 15.8 | 34.5 6.2 17.8 |
Field Goal % FG Made FG Attempts | 49.2 29.0 59.0 | 45.6 27.8 61.0 | 43.5 23.6 54.2 | ||
3 Point % 3P Made 3PAttempts | 34.2 5.4 15.8 | 38.0 6.0 15.8 | 34.5 6.2 17.8 |
i'm leaning towards marq. i looked into the rebounding advantage that you brought up, and I don't know if it is going to make a big enough difference to offset the other areas where Marq has the advantage.
Take Marq's game at Uconn for example: Uconn is statistically a better rebounding team than WVU, and Marq outrebounded them (holding them to 8 offensive boards; that is 1 every 5 minutes).
Additionally, Marq plays a fast paced game and actually got 9 offensive rebounds for themselves.
On the other end, Marq is a great shooting team, and they score in bunches. Maybe WVU gets some boards and offensive second chances like you say, but I'm tempted to side with Marq because I don't think WVU will be able to score with them throughout the course of the game.
i'm leaning towards marq. i looked into the rebounding advantage that you brought up, and I don't know if it is going to make a big enough difference to offset the other areas where Marq has the advantage.
Take Marq's game at Uconn for example: Uconn is statistically a better rebounding team than WVU, and Marq outrebounded them (holding them to 8 offensive boards; that is 1 every 5 minutes).
Additionally, Marq plays a fast paced game and actually got 9 offensive rebounds for themselves.
On the other end, Marq is a great shooting team, and they score in bunches. Maybe WVU gets some boards and offensive second chances like you say, but I'm tempted to side with Marq because I don't think WVU will be able to score with them throughout the course of the game.
i'm leaning towards marq. i looked into the rebounding advantage that you brought up, and I don't know if it is going to make a big enough difference to offset the other areas where Marq has the advantage.
Take Marq's game at Uconn for example: Uconn is statistically a better rebounding team than WVU, and Marq outrebounded them (holding them to 8 offensive boards; that is 1 every 5 minutes).
Additionally, Marq plays a fast paced game and actually got 9 offensive rebounds for themselves.
On the other end, Marq is a great shooting team, and they score in bunches. Maybe WVU gets some boards and offensive second chances like you say, but I'm tempted to side with Marq because I don't think WVU will be able to score with them throughout the course of the game.
i'm leaning towards marq. i looked into the rebounding advantage that you brought up, and I don't know if it is going to make a big enough difference to offset the other areas where Marq has the advantage.
Take Marq's game at Uconn for example: Uconn is statistically a better rebounding team than WVU, and Marq outrebounded them (holding them to 8 offensive boards; that is 1 every 5 minutes).
Additionally, Marq plays a fast paced game and actually got 9 offensive rebounds for themselves.
On the other end, Marq is a great shooting team, and they score in bunches. Maybe WVU gets some boards and offensive second chances like you say, but I'm tempted to side with Marq because I don't think WVU will be able to score with them throughout the course of the game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.