All Forums | College Basketball

2H...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 71251
Posts: 1627
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #76
2H...adding..

Pacific -3.5....they blow them out tonight...5 units...



PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #77
This Idaho/Eastern Washington game is setting up as a real humdinger of a 2H play...

The Eagles are playing like total crap here in the 1H and the Vandals are shooting out of their minds...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #78
Pepperdine may also be a play...will keep an eye on it as it gets closer to the half...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #79
Adding...2H...

Eastern Washington -10.5... 5 units...

Actually opened at -9.5...but moved so fast I couldn't lock it in...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2020
Posts: 136
Posted: #80

My book has it at -12. Just ignore?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #81
Quote Originally Posted by sAISERkOSE:

My book has it at -12. Just ignore?


I believe they will still cover that line...but maybe go a little lighter...I love the play, wanted to do 10 units but tapped the brakes...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #82
2H...adding...

BYU -5...5 units...

BYU is bombing from the 3 point line...only 37% from the field while Loyola is 52% from the field but 0-5 on 3 pointers......and leading the game by 8....

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #83
No play on the other games...not liking what I am seeing in the stats and the play on the court...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #84
Belmont...crushing Winner!...
Pacific......................Winner!
Eastern Washington...Winner!
Pepperdine!......wishing I had played it now....lol.......

BYU....crushing Winner!...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2020
Posts: 136
Posted: #85

Thanks for your picks, followed on all of the above (Except Pepp, but more power to that guy). 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by sAISERkOSE:

Thanks for your picks, followed on all of the above (Except Pepp, but more power to that guy). 


Glad to see someone benefited...so often it is a thankless work with trolls and haters the only respondents.....

Still trying to figure out why I didn't like UCLA in that spot at the half....normally, I would have played them...but I didn't...

Going to study that a bit...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 2639
Posted: #87

Good call byu. Ty

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 16183
Posted: #88

Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:

Quote Originally Posted by sAISERkOSE:

Glad to see someone benefited...trolls and haters the only respondents.....Still trying to figure out why I didn't like UCLA in that spot at the half....normally, I would have played them...but I didn't...Going to study that a bit...

I wonder what I fall under... an_tongueoutbigsmile

Strange how at times, you miss a play or don't play it for whatever reason and it turns out a loser.. I think UCLA was -6.5 for the 2nd half when down 4 at the half? Making them -2.5 for the whole game? Things happen for a reason. You can't bet'em/win'em all.. 

Off to tomorrow.. new_sleeping1

"Schrödinger's bet." A bet that loses when you bet it but wins when you DON'T bet it...
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2018
Posts: 6862
Posted: #89

Wtf I had Ucla -6.5 2H (which means -2.5 whole game) and my bookie gave me a loss, wtfffffff. I contacted customer support. Doesn't make sense, every website shows ucla 86-83. My bookie policy says it includes overtime in pre-game bets such as second half bets.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #90
Quote Originally Posted by ayashifx55:

Wtf I had Ucla -6.5 2H (which means -2.5 whole game) and my bookie gave me a loss, wtfffffff. I contacted customer support. Doesn't make sense, every website shows ucla 86-83. My bookie policy says it includes overtime in pre-game bets such as second half bets.


2H score was 49 to 56 with UCLA winning by 7...there is no way they should have counted that a loss...did you get it fixed?

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #91
Northern Iowa is a very interesting 2H candidate...will be checking it out...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #92
Oops ...meant Northern Kentucky...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #93
Davidson also shooting way above their grade in 1H...Bonnies should be a play...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2018
Posts: 6862
Posted: #94

Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:

Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:

Quote Originally Posted by sAISERkOSE:

Glad to see someone benefited...trolls and haters the only respondents.....Still trying to figure out why I didn't like UCLA in that spot at the half....normally, I would have played them...but I didn't...Going to study that a bit...
I wonder what I fall under...  Strange how at times, you miss a play or don't play it for whatever reason and it turns out a loser.. I think UCLA was -6.5 for the 2nd half when down 4 at the half? Making them -2.5 for the whole game? Things happen for a reason. You can't bet'em/win'em all..  Off to tomorrow.. Wtf I had Ucla -6.5 2H (which means -2.5 whole game) and my bookie gave me a loss, wtfffffff. I contacted customer support. Doesn't make sense, every website shows ucla 86-83. My bookie policy says it includes overtime in pre-game bets such as second half bets.
Quote Originally Posted by ayashifx55:

Wtf I had Ucla -6.5 2H (which means -2.5 whole game) and my bookie gave me a loss, wtfffffff. I contacted customer support. Doesn't make sense, every website shows ucla 86-83. My bookie policy says it includes overtime in pre-game bets such as second half bets.
2H score was 49 to 56 with UCLA winning by 7...there is no way they should have counted that a loss...did you get it fixed?Northern Iowa is a very interesting 2H candidate...will be checking it out...Oops ...meant Northern Kentucky...Davidson also shooting way above their grade in 1H...Bonnies should be a play...

Hey smack, thanks for asking. They fixed it! Bol on 2H plays 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #95
2H adding...man those lines were changing FAST...

St. Bonny -6

Northern Kentucky -9

5 units each!...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2016
Posts: 2416
Posted: #96

Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:

Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:

Quote Originally Posted by sAISERkOSE:

Glad to see someone benefited...trolls and haters the only respondents.....Still trying to figure out why I didn't like UCLA in that spot at the half....normally, I would have played them...but I didn't...Going to study that a bit...
I wonder what I fall under...  Strange how at times, you miss a play or don't play it for whatever reason and it turns out a loser.. I think UCLA was -6.5 for the 2nd half when down 4 at the half? Making them -2.5 for the whole game? Things happen for a reason. You can't bet'em/win'em all..  Off to tomorrow.. Wtf I had Ucla -6.5 2H (which means -2.5 whole game) and my bookie gave me a loss, wtfffffff. I contacted customer support. Doesn't make sense, every website shows ucla 86-83. My bookie policy says it includes overtime in pre-game bets such as second half bets.
Quote Originally Posted by ayashifx55:

Wtf I had Ucla -6.5 2H (which means -2.5 whole game) and my bookie gave me a loss, wtfffffff. I contacted customer support. Doesn't make sense, every website shows ucla 86-83. My bookie policy says it includes overtime in pre-game bets such as second half bets.
2H score was 49 to 56 with UCLA winning by 7...there is no way they should have counted that a loss...did you get it fixed?Northern Iowa is a very interesting 2H candidate...will be checking it out...Oops ...meant Northern Kentucky...Davidson also shooting way above their grade in 1H...Bonnies should be a play...
Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:

Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:

Quote Originally Posted by sAISERkOSE:

Glad to see someone benefited...trolls and haters the only respondents.....Still trying to figure out why I didn't like UCLA in that spot at the half....normally, I would have played them...but I didn't...Going to study that a bit...
I wonder what I fall under...  Strange how at times, you miss a play or don't play it for whatever reason and it turns out a loser.. I think UCLA was -6.5 for the 2nd half when down 4 at the half? Making them -2.5 for the whole game? Things happen for a reason. You can't bet'em/win'em all..  Off to tomorrow.. Wtf I had Ucla -6.5 2H (which means -2.5 whole game) and my bookie gave me a loss, wtfffffff. I contacted customer support. Doesn't make sense, every website shows ucla 86-83. My bookie policy says it includes overtime in pre-game bets such as second half bets.
Quote Originally Posted by ayashifx55:

Wtf I had Ucla -6.5 2H (which means -2.5 whole game) and my bookie gave me a loss, wtfffffff. I contacted customer support. Doesn't make sense, every website shows ucla 86-83. My bookie policy says it includes overtime in pre-game bets such as second half bets.
2H score was 49 to 56 with UCLA winning by 7...there is no way they should have counted that a loss...did you get it fixed?Northern Iowa is a very interesting 2H candidate...will be checking it out...Oops ...meant Northern Kentucky...Davidson also shooting way above their grade in 1H...Bonnies should be a play...
Hey smack, thanks for asking. They fixed it! Bol on 2H plays 2H adding...man those lines were changing FAST...St. Bonny -6Northern Kentucky -95 units each!...
Talking smack !! peace_5

"The System Is Designed to Destroy the Degenerate Gambler" - Joey Diaz
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2016
Posts: 2416
Posted: #97

tailing * clover

"The System Is Designed to Destroy the Degenerate Gambler" - Joey Diaz
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #98
Thanks gentlemen!......

Looking at both North Dakota State and South Dakota State as possible plays...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #99
2H...

North Dakota State -4 is a lean...may or may not play it...

South Dakota State -9.5...3 units...

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #100
1-1 on the night...strange how the Bonnies just laid down completely tonight...even in the 2H...almost makes me think the team had the flu or something...

Terrible defense...Davidson shot 56% from the field and 52 on 3 pointers going 13-25...

Just like they didn't care...

PM for the skinny on the down low
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.