This trend would seem to favor Houston, Seattle, Baltimore, and Chicago in this week's action...
This trend would seem to favor Houston, Seattle, Baltimore, and Chicago in this week's action...
This trend would seem to favor Houston, Seattle, Baltimore, and Chicago in this week's action...
This trend would seem to favor Houston, Seattle, Baltimore, and Chicago in this week's action...
This trend would seem to favor Houston, Seattle, Baltimore, and Chicago in this week's action...
This trend would seem to favor Houston, Seattle, Baltimore, and Chicago in this week's action...
One game I am sure of is that Baltimore will run for way more yards than the San Diego Chargers...
One game I am sure of is that Baltimore will run for way more yards than the San Diego Chargers...
Yeah, Jackson sucked in the red zone in LA...0-3 the last time they played. If the Chargers find some way to get the lead in the second half, Harbaugh with it all on the line might switch to Flacco...wouldn't you?
What will Rivers try? Resort to screens...he tried the short passing game the last time and it didn't work. If the Baltimore pass rush gets penetration on him, it will be a long day. The Chargers will try to run the ball...they couldn't do it last time.
In the game in LA, I felt that a few of those ref calls against LAC were questionable...they had 8 penalties versus only 4 for the Ravens...and of course Lamar's fumbling...yeah, intrigued at how it will all turn out. Tucker also missed two field goals but nailed a 56 yarder...the game screams chaos and intrigue...can't wait.
Yeah, Jackson sucked in the red zone in LA...0-3 the last time they played. If the Chargers find some way to get the lead in the second half, Harbaugh with it all on the line might switch to Flacco...wouldn't you?
What will Rivers try? Resort to screens...he tried the short passing game the last time and it didn't work. If the Baltimore pass rush gets penetration on him, it will be a long day. The Chargers will try to run the ball...they couldn't do it last time.
In the game in LA, I felt that a few of those ref calls against LAC were questionable...they had 8 penalties versus only 4 for the Ravens...and of course Lamar's fumbling...yeah, intrigued at how it will all turn out. Tucker also missed two field goals but nailed a 56 yarder...the game screams chaos and intrigue...can't wait.
Here's a good one I heard one Gill Alexander's podcast:Since 1978, the spread in NFL games has mattered only 17% of the time. In other words, if a favorite won but didn't cover. Makes you think how really insignificant these #'s really are...But in the wildcard round of the playoffs, it has mattered only 10% of the time.So basically you just gotta pick a winner. If you like the dog, f*ck the points and take the + return on the ML. If you like the fav, take the -110 on the spread. No need to pay extra juice on the ML.[/Quote]
Here's a good one I heard one Gill Alexander's podcast:Since 1978, the spread in NFL games has mattered only 17% of the time. In other words, if a favorite won but didn't cover. Makes you think how really insignificant these #'s really are...But in the wildcard round of the playoffs, it has mattered only 10% of the time.So basically you just gotta pick a winner. If you like the dog, f*ck the points and take the + return on the ML. If you like the fav, take the -110 on the spread. No need to pay extra juice on the ML.[/Quote]
In the WC game played? Or avg rush yards over the first 16 games of the regular season? Or just the most recent 3 or 6 games before the WC game?
Teams comfortably ahead in any NFL game tend to have a ton more rush yards since they rush more in the 3rd and 4th quarters to run the clock.
Thanks for this thread
In the WC game played? Or avg rush yards over the first 16 games of the regular season? Or just the most recent 3 or 6 games before the WC game?
Teams comfortably ahead in any NFL game tend to have a ton more rush yards since they rush more in the 3rd and 4th quarters to run the clock.
Thanks for this thread
Without knowing the final stats postgame, how does this trend actually help anyone looking to place a bet pregame?
Anyone who specializes with ingame wagering, this trend is definitely noteworthy for a potential halftime wager
Without knowing the final stats postgame, how does this trend actually help anyone looking to place a bet pregame?
Anyone who specializes with ingame wagering, this trend is definitely noteworthy for a potential halftime wager
In the WC game played? Or avg rush yards over the first 16 games of the regular season? Or just the most recent 3 or 6 games before the WC game?
Teams comfortably ahead in any NFL game tend to have a ton more rush yards since they rush more in the 3rd and 4th quarters to run the clock.
Thanks for this thread
In the WC game played? Or avg rush yards over the first 16 games of the regular season? Or just the most recent 3 or 6 games before the WC game?
Teams comfortably ahead in any NFL game tend to have a ton more rush yards since they rush more in the 3rd and 4th quarters to run the clock.
Thanks for this thread
Without knowing the final stats postgame, how does this trend actually help anyone looking to place a bet pregame?
Anyone who specializes with ingame wagering, this trend is definitely noteworthy for a potential halftime wager
Without knowing the final stats postgame, how does this trend actually help anyone looking to place a bet pregame?
Anyone who specializes with ingame wagering, this trend is definitely noteworthy for a potential halftime wager
Anyway all good stuff and Sac I've said it many times the spread really doesn't matter all that much in NFL - the numbers I have are <13% of games land within 4 points of the spread in either direction. That's an 8 point swing - which is why teasers are a thing. There was someone posting here in NCAAFB a few days ago advocating buying points back to the opening line - YIKES!
Anyway all good stuff and Sac I've said it many times the spread really doesn't matter all that much in NFL - the numbers I have are <13% of games land within 4 points of the spread in either direction. That's an 8 point swing - which is why teasers are a thing. There was someone posting here in NCAAFB a few days ago advocating buying points back to the opening line - YIKES!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.