Locked in Krygios at +2500 and Fed +190. Hopefully they end up on opposite sides of the draw.
I watched Krygiois the other night and his serve was ridiculous. Winning games in under a minute. He is a head case but will have the support of the home crowd. He is capable of beating anyone on this surface if his serve is on point. Love this value.
Fed...not much of an explanation needed. He is on a mission past year and a half and knows his time is running out to add to his major title trophies. Definitely helps that a lot of the top guys are coming off injuries and are out of form.
Locked in Krygios at +2500 and Fed +190. Hopefully they end up on opposite sides of the draw.
I watched Krygiois the other night and his serve was ridiculous. Winning games in under a minute. He is a head case but will have the support of the home crowd. He is capable of beating anyone on this surface if his serve is on point. Love this value.
Fed...not much of an explanation needed. He is on a mission past year and a half and knows his time is running out to add to his major title trophies. Definitely helps that a lot of the top guys are coming off injuries and are out of form.
Not a big futures bettor but I think Dimitrov can finally reach his full potential and win a major this year. Could be this one.
As far as Kyrgios I'm a believer in his talent, it all depends on how he handles adversity. He is fully capable of making a deep run and at same time fully capable of getting upset in the first round. The guy is flaky as hell. You are getting a great number though at +2500 I have it at +1400 at bet365.
Taking Fed at only +190 makes no sense to me. Zero value. But it's his tourney to lose.
Not a big futures bettor but I think Dimitrov can finally reach his full potential and win a major this year. Could be this one.
As far as Kyrgios I'm a believer in his talent, it all depends on how he handles adversity. He is fully capable of making a deep run and at same time fully capable of getting upset in the first round. The guy is flaky as hell. You are getting a great number though at +2500 I have it at +1400 at bet365.
Taking Fed at only +190 makes no sense to me. Zero value. But it's his tourney to lose.
No faith in Joker until he shows me he is back in form and has his head out of the clouds. I think Fed makes the finals at the very least and will have opportunities to middle/ hedge if I feel like it. heritage has krygios +2500 but 5dimes only had +1400 fyi
No faith in Joker until he shows me he is back in form and has his head out of the clouds. I think Fed makes the finals at the very least and will have opportunities to middle/ hedge if I feel like it. heritage has krygios +2500 but 5dimes only had +1400 fyi
How about Radwanska +6600 on the woman's side? Sure it's a long shot but she can beat anyone, just beat a solid Jo Konta in straights, no solid favorite this year..
How about Radwanska +6600 on the woman's side? Sure it's a long shot but she can beat anyone, just beat a solid Jo Konta in straights, no solid favorite this year..
How about Radwanska +6600 on the woman's side? Sure it's a long shot but she can beat anyone, just beat a solid Jo Konta in straights, no solid favorite this year..
Radwanska will never win a SLam. She cannot beat just anyone. Giorgi just showed why yesterday. 100th ranked player in the world blew that Polish fraud off the court easily. Konta is still a long way off being capable of winning a Slam herself because her ground game (Radwanska's specialty) isn't yet consistent or solid enough.
The women's draw is wide open for an aggressive player to win. Wozniacki/Stephens/Radwanska and all the other pushers can suck my balls, they'll need a miracle from God to win (like Stephen's miracle at the USO drawing that useless beotch keys as an opponent in the final).
How about Radwanska +6600 on the woman's side? Sure it's a long shot but she can beat anyone, just beat a solid Jo Konta in straights, no solid favorite this year..
Radwanska will never win a SLam. She cannot beat just anyone. Giorgi just showed why yesterday. 100th ranked player in the world blew that Polish fraud off the court easily. Konta is still a long way off being capable of winning a Slam herself because her ground game (Radwanska's specialty) isn't yet consistent or solid enough.
The women's draw is wide open for an aggressive player to win. Wozniacki/Stephens/Radwanska and all the other pushers can suck my balls, they'll need a miracle from God to win (like Stephen's miracle at the USO drawing that useless beotch keys as an opponent in the final).
Radwanska is definitely on the decline. But Giorgi isn't your average 100th ranked player. When she is on and hitting lazers all over the court she can beat anyone. Plus she has some slutty pictures online which gets bonus points from me. One of my favorites to bet as a dog and to look at. She's beaten a lot of top names. Pliskova, Svitolina, Sharapova, Muguruza, Wozniacki Radwanska, Vandeweghe, Stephens, Azarenka she beat them all as a dog.
Radwanska is definitely on the decline. But Giorgi isn't your average 100th ranked player. When she is on and hitting lazers all over the court she can beat anyone. Plus she has some slutty pictures online which gets bonus points from me. One of my favorites to bet as a dog and to look at. She's beaten a lot of top names. Pliskova, Svitolina, Sharapova, Muguruza, Wozniacki Radwanska, Vandeweghe, Stephens, Azarenka she beat them all as a dog.
Bencic +3300 peaks my attention...she has the game and talent to make a 2 week run if her head is on straight...she was supposed to be the next big thing before she fell off the rails.
Halep +750 also value there if you ask me...Aussie Open is always about fitness and Halep may be a world class choker, but there is no one who is more physcially fit on the court than her.
Men side, no one other than Roger or Rafa should be considered to make it here to the finals....Djoker is a dreamers dream if you think he will just magically pick up a racquet and win a slam when not close to 100% physically fit...and none of the next geners are ready to beat Roger or Rafa in best out of 5.
If you feel the need for a longshot lotto ticket, consider De Minaur at 250-1...hes got to be one of the hottest players right now...and could beat Berdych Delpo and Goffin if the kid remains on fire...you really never know...Aussie Opens back in the day had crazy results and strange finalists back in the day...hope for an interesting and fun to watch event.
The ladies event will undoubtedly be a coin flip, and i highly advise to not bet too hard any favorite which looks unbeatable...dogs will be barking loudly over the first 2 rounds before the dust settles.
Bencic +3300 peaks my attention...she has the game and talent to make a 2 week run if her head is on straight...she was supposed to be the next big thing before she fell off the rails.
Halep +750 also value there if you ask me...Aussie Open is always about fitness and Halep may be a world class choker, but there is no one who is more physcially fit on the court than her.
Men side, no one other than Roger or Rafa should be considered to make it here to the finals....Djoker is a dreamers dream if you think he will just magically pick up a racquet and win a slam when not close to 100% physically fit...and none of the next geners are ready to beat Roger or Rafa in best out of 5.
If you feel the need for a longshot lotto ticket, consider De Minaur at 250-1...hes got to be one of the hottest players right now...and could beat Berdych Delpo and Goffin if the kid remains on fire...you really never know...Aussie Opens back in the day had crazy results and strange finalists back in the day...hope for an interesting and fun to watch event.
The ladies event will undoubtedly be a coin flip, and i highly advise to not bet too hard any favorite which looks unbeatable...dogs will be barking loudly over the first 2 rounds before the dust settles.
Radwanska is definitely on the decline. But Giorgi isn't your average 100th ranked player. When she is on and hitting lazers all over the court she can beat anyone. Plus she has some slutty pictures online which gets bonus points from me. One of my favorites to bet as a dog and to look at. She's beaten a lot of top names. Pliskova, Svitolina, Sharapova, Muguruza, Wozniacki Radwanska, Vandeweghe, Stephens, Azarenka she beat them all as a dog.
Giorgi is ranked 100th for good reason: she has shown zero ability to consistently back up one good effort. Her consistency at Sydney has been a thing to behold. If she's actually turned a corner on that front, then she's not going to remain that lower ranked for long. But until she does turn that corner, she'll remain forever and a day a player who can beat one good player on one day then lose easily to a turd in the next round.
Radwanska is definitely on the decline. But Giorgi isn't your average 100th ranked player. When she is on and hitting lazers all over the court she can beat anyone. Plus she has some slutty pictures online which gets bonus points from me. One of my favorites to bet as a dog and to look at. She's beaten a lot of top names. Pliskova, Svitolina, Sharapova, Muguruza, Wozniacki Radwanska, Vandeweghe, Stephens, Azarenka she beat them all as a dog.
Giorgi is ranked 100th for good reason: she has shown zero ability to consistently back up one good effort. Her consistency at Sydney has been a thing to behold. If she's actually turned a corner on that front, then she's not going to remain that lower ranked for long. But until she does turn that corner, she'll remain forever and a day a player who can beat one good player on one day then lose easily to a turd in the next round.
It's all or nothing for Giorgi. She is a beauty. Can beat a top 5 player one match hitting missiles for winners left right and center, and then lose to a Top 200 player the next match hitting unforced error after unforced error. What's not to love about that? We are all gambling on this crap. Just bet the dog in all her matches and hope for the best. Never said i think she's a future #1 or major winner, nothing like that. I just like to bet on her as a dog quite often because when she's on, she is tough to deal with. Look who's she's beaten already, your average #100 player in the world doesn't beat 10% of those names. And fading her as a favorite makes sense too because when she's off her game, she can lose to almost anyone. She is a beauty. One of my favorites.
It's all or nothing for Giorgi. She is a beauty. Can beat a top 5 player one match hitting missiles for winners left right and center, and then lose to a Top 200 player the next match hitting unforced error after unforced error. What's not to love about that? We are all gambling on this crap. Just bet the dog in all her matches and hope for the best. Never said i think she's a future #1 or major winner, nothing like that. I just like to bet on her as a dog quite often because when she's on, she is tough to deal with. Look who's she's beaten already, your average #100 player in the world doesn't beat 10% of those names. And fading her as a favorite makes sense too because when she's off her game, she can lose to almost anyone. She is a beauty. One of my favorites.
Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house.
Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house.
Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house.
This must've involved only a quick look at the stats KSF, because otherwise it's not correct. Taking the dog for 1 unit in main draw matches dating back to 2016 results in a +620-odd unit profit. It's only when you excise clay court matches that things get a lot less profitable (but still profitable) because that's the surface Giorgi is most up & (more) down on.
Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house.
This must've involved only a quick look at the stats KSF, because otherwise it's not correct. Taking the dog for 1 unit in main draw matches dating back to 2016 results in a +620-odd unit profit. It's only when you excise clay court matches that things get a lot less profitable (but still profitable) because that's the surface Giorgi is most up & (more) down on.
Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house.
Lol I swear you can take a comment and spin it any way you want. It's a real skill you have there at being a ignorant arse.
Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house.
Lol I swear you can take a comment and spin it any way you want. It's a real skill you have there at being a ignorant arse.
Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house.
Where in the blue hell did you get those numbers you KiwiClown? I did the math. Here are Giorgi's stats AS A UNDERDOG since 2014:
Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house.
Where in the blue hell did you get those numbers you KiwiClown? I did the math. Here are Giorgi's stats AS A UNDERDOG since 2014:
QUOTE Originally Posted by KiwiSportsFan: Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house. Where in the blue hell did you get those numbers you KiwiClown? I did the math. Here are Giorgi's stats AS A UNDERDOG since 2014: Giorgi as a underdog: 2018: 4-1 +4.3 units 2017: 10-7 +9.25 units 2016: 7-14 -5.95 units 2015: 6-9 +0.15 units 2014: 10-10 +10.45 units Total: 37-41 +18.2 units
It gets even better:
2013: 5-7 +3.4 units
2012: 11-8 +14.2 units
Grand Total of 53-56 +35.8 units
In 109 matches since 2012 Camila Giorgi is +35.8 legit units. Please tell me again how backing her as a dog would lead one to the poor house?
QUOTE Originally Posted by KiwiSportsFan: Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house. Where in the blue hell did you get those numbers you KiwiClown? I did the math. Here are Giorgi's stats AS A UNDERDOG since 2014: Giorgi as a underdog: 2018: 4-1 +4.3 units 2017: 10-7 +9.25 units 2016: 7-14 -5.95 units 2015: 6-9 +0.15 units 2014: 10-10 +10.45 units Total: 37-41 +18.2 units
It gets even better:
2013: 5-7 +3.4 units
2012: 11-8 +14.2 units
Grand Total of 53-56 +35.8 units
In 109 matches since 2012 Camila Giorgi is +35.8 legit units. Please tell me again how backing her as a dog would lead one to the poor house?
QUOTE Originally Posted by KiwiSportsFan: Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house. Where in the blue hell did you get those numbers you KiwiClown? I did the math. Here are Giorgi's stats AS A UNDERDOG since 2014: Giorgi as a underdog: 2018: 4-1 +4.3 units 2017: 10-7 +9.25 units 2016: 7-14 -5.95 units 2015: 6-9 +0.15 units 2014: 10-10 +10.45 units Total: 37-41 +18.2 units
It gets even better:
2013: 5-7 +3.4 units
2012: 11-8 +14.2 units
Grand Total of 53-56 +35.8 units
In 109 matches since 2012 Camila Giorgi is +35.8 legit units. Please tell me again how backing her as a dog would lead one to the poor house?
QUOTE Originally Posted by KiwiSportsFan: Prior to 2018, players paying +100 or less had won 31 of Giorgi's last 47 matches. Of those 17 players of +101 or more that cashed, only 4 paid more than +199. Restricting yourself to backing decent dogs in her matches is a road that has led straight to the poor house. Where in the blue hell did you get those numbers you KiwiClown? I did the math. Here are Giorgi's stats AS A UNDERDOG since 2014: Giorgi as a underdog: 2018: 4-1 +4.3 units 2017: 10-7 +9.25 units 2016: 7-14 -5.95 units 2015: 6-9 +0.15 units 2014: 10-10 +10.45 units Total: 37-41 +18.2 units
It gets even better:
2013: 5-7 +3.4 units
2012: 11-8 +14.2 units
Grand Total of 53-56 +35.8 units
In 109 matches since 2012 Camila Giorgi is +35.8 legit units. Please tell me again how backing her as a dog would lead one to the poor house?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.