Seahawks have been an average team who barley makes the playoffs and plays in a weak division, has underperformed on the road since they lost to the Patriots in 2014 and lost Marshawn Lynch(haven't been quite the same since). Any coaching changes or player additions to make me think otherwise??? Absolutely not.
-Offensive line is still one of the worst in the league -Eddie Lacey isn't a good RB, only started on GB because they have a weak Stable -Legion of whom? No this is not the same defense as 2012-2014, still very good but not to the point where they carry the team. They don't put fear in offenses like they used to.
Take GREENBAY -3. GB very good at home, and Seahawks perform poorly in GB and especially on the road in general. Rodgers is the worst possible matchup for this defense when they have to go on the road.
Seahawks have been an average team who barley makes the playoffs and plays in a weak division, has underperformed on the road since they lost to the Patriots in 2014 and lost Marshawn Lynch(haven't been quite the same since). Any coaching changes or player additions to make me think otherwise??? Absolutely not.
-Offensive line is still one of the worst in the league -Eddie Lacey isn't a good RB, only started on GB because they have a weak Stable -Legion of whom? No this is not the same defense as 2012-2014, still very good but not to the point where they carry the team. They don't put fear in offenses like they used to.
Take GREENBAY -3. GB very good at home, and Seahawks perform poorly in GB and especially on the road in general. Rodgers is the worst possible matchup for this defense when they have to go on the road.
It is tempting to bet against them on road games, keep in mind though that Green Bay often start season off slow and that defense work together better earlier in the season than offense.
It is tempting to bet against them on road games, keep in mind though that Green Bay often start season off slow and that defense work together better earlier in the season than offense.
It is tempting to bet against them on road games, keep in mind though that Green Bay often start season off slow and that defense work together better earlier in the season than offense.
Rodgers is 7-1 in home openers ...winning 4 straight
It is tempting to bet against them on road games, keep in mind though that Green Bay often start season off slow and that defense work together better earlier in the season than offense.
Rodgers is 7-1 in home openers ...winning 4 straight
Plus you have to keep in mind that GB is winning SU at home 76% of the time with an average margin of +9.5 ppg. While SEA is winning on the road only 54% of the time with a MOV of 4 ppg. That net of 5.5 pts is obviously a cover for the current -3 line.
Also, GB gives up fewer sacks as well as gets more sacks than SEA does. The Packers also run/ pass the ball better. They are better on 3rd down, both on OFF & DEF. They are also better at minimizing INT's on OFF and they get more on DEF.
Check the stats for the past 5 years and you will see what I am talking about.
Even though this game is not in my top 5 its still a good pick.
Plus you have to keep in mind that GB is winning SU at home 76% of the time with an average margin of +9.5 ppg. While SEA is winning on the road only 54% of the time with a MOV of 4 ppg. That net of 5.5 pts is obviously a cover for the current -3 line.
Also, GB gives up fewer sacks as well as gets more sacks than SEA does. The Packers also run/ pass the ball better. They are better on 3rd down, both on OFF & DEF. They are also better at minimizing INT's on OFF and they get more on DEF.
Check the stats for the past 5 years and you will see what I am talking about.
Even though this game is not in my top 5 its still a good pick.
Gotta love it. ... "Legion of Whom?"Plus you have to keep in mind that GB is winning SU at home 76% of the time with an average margin of +9.5 ppg. While SEA is winning on the road only 54% of the time with a MOV of 4 ppg. That net of 5.5 pts is obviously a cover for the current -3 line. Also, GB gives up fewer sacks as well as gets more sacks than SEA does. The Packers also run/ pass the ball better. They are better on 3rd down, both on OFF & DEF. They are also better at minimizing INT's on OFF and they get more on DEF. Check the stats for the past 5 years and you will see what I am talking about.Even though this game is not in my top 5 its still a good pick.Take it! GB -3 at home is a gift.
Love the feedback, very factual and you had a ton of statistics and reasoning. Great stuff sir
Gotta love it. ... "Legion of Whom?"Plus you have to keep in mind that GB is winning SU at home 76% of the time with an average margin of +9.5 ppg. While SEA is winning on the road only 54% of the time with a MOV of 4 ppg. That net of 5.5 pts is obviously a cover for the current -3 line. Also, GB gives up fewer sacks as well as gets more sacks than SEA does. The Packers also run/ pass the ball better. They are better on 3rd down, both on OFF & DEF. They are also better at minimizing INT's on OFF and they get more on DEF. Check the stats for the past 5 years and you will see what I am talking about.Even though this game is not in my top 5 its still a good pick.Take it! GB -3 at home is a gift.
Love the feedback, very factual and you had a ton of statistics and reasoning. Great stuff sir
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.