Texas Tech game was 27-27 prior to OT. So actually a terriffic number. The other two, it happens, college totals always look worse b/c of poor tackling, poor execution, OT and turnovers. The other 4 games, what I'd find more impressive is telling us which game totals are "easy" or "dumb" before 4 pm, when you've seen 3 of these 5 games go final, and seen 2 others 1 high scoring quarter into the game. Besides, Clemson's gonna have to get all 55 on their own, Maryland's got a LB playing QB.
So in summation, make this post at 11:30 next time so we can bet along with your genius.
Texas Tech game was 27-27 prior to OT. So actually a terriffic number. The other two, it happens, college totals always look worse b/c of poor tackling, poor execution, OT and turnovers. The other 4 games, what I'd find more impressive is telling us which game totals are "easy" or "dumb" before 4 pm, when you've seen 3 of these 5 games go final, and seen 2 others 1 high scoring quarter into the game. Besides, Clemson's gonna have to get all 55 on their own, Maryland's got a LB playing QB.
So in summation, make this post at 11:30 next time so we can bet along with your genius.
Texas Tech game was 27-27 prior to OT. So actually a terriffic number. The other two, it happens, college totals always look worse b/c of poor tackling, poor execution, OT and turnovers. The other 4 games, what I'd find more impressive is telling us which game totals are "easy" or "dumb" before 4 pm, when you've seen 3 of these 5 games go final, and seen 2 others 1 high scoring quarter into the game. Besides, Clemson's gonna have to get all 55 on their own, Maryland's got a LB playing QB.
So in summation, make this post at 11:30 next time so we can bet along with your genius.
there were 37 points score at the half of the texas tech game.
It took an act of god to keep that game low scoring 2nd half....and it still soared over by over 20 points.
Texas Tech game was 27-27 prior to OT. So actually a terriffic number. The other two, it happens, college totals always look worse b/c of poor tackling, poor execution, OT and turnovers. The other 4 games, what I'd find more impressive is telling us which game totals are "easy" or "dumb" before 4 pm, when you've seen 3 of these 5 games go final, and seen 2 others 1 high scoring quarter into the game. Besides, Clemson's gonna have to get all 55 on their own, Maryland's got a LB playing QB.
So in summation, make this post at 11:30 next time so we can bet along with your genius.
there were 37 points score at the half of the texas tech game.
It took an act of god to keep that game low scoring 2nd half....and it still soared over by over 20 points.
i mean...wtf is the point of setting that clemson total at 55?
If their goal is to try and generate 50/50 action then they are idiots. you cant put out a line of 55 in a clemson game and expect there to be 50/50 action. Im not joking when i say every single person i know is on the clemson over today......you think everyone is just a genius?
I mean from time to time people are going to be right, some games are layups...but this total in this game is pure stupidity.
The only way this goes under is if maryland doesnt score 1 single point, even then...its probably going to be 63-0 clemson.
i mean...wtf is the point of setting that clemson total at 55?
If their goal is to try and generate 50/50 action then they are idiots. you cant put out a line of 55 in a clemson game and expect there to be 50/50 action. Im not joking when i say every single person i know is on the clemson over today......you think everyone is just a genius?
I mean from time to time people are going to be right, some games are layups...but this total in this game is pure stupidity.
The only way this goes under is if maryland doesnt score 1 single point, even then...its probably going to be 63-0 clemson.
You're an idiot. They dont want 50/50 action, they want to set the highest line possible where all your friends will hit the over knowing that maryland wont score and clemson will be playing all backups in the second half. But ok you're right they built all those hotels in the desert bc they are idiots. That makes more sense.
You're an idiot. They dont want 50/50 action, they want to set the highest line possible where all your friends will hit the over knowing that maryland wont score and clemson will be playing all backups in the second half. But ok you're right they built all those hotels in the desert bc they are idiots. That makes more sense.
You're an idiot. They dont want 50/50 action, they want to set the highest line possible where all your friends will hit the over knowing that maryland wont score and clemson will be playing all backups in the second half. But ok you're right they built all those hotels in the desert bc they are idiots. That makes more sense.
sigh...
this has been the worst year for books, probably ever.
Do you even read?
do you have any idea the amount of money vegas bookmakers have lost in the last 2 weeks?
capping isnt what it used to be, now the public has so much more access to information because of this great invention called "the internet"
but whatever, i have no time to argue...think what you want.
Youre right...good line by vegas setting that clemson total at 55. 2 tds in the 2nd half and its over, but hey, what do i know
You're an idiot. They dont want 50/50 action, they want to set the highest line possible where all your friends will hit the over knowing that maryland wont score and clemson will be playing all backups in the second half. But ok you're right they built all those hotels in the desert bc they are idiots. That makes more sense.
sigh...
this has been the worst year for books, probably ever.
Do you even read?
do you have any idea the amount of money vegas bookmakers have lost in the last 2 weeks?
capping isnt what it used to be, now the public has so much more access to information because of this great invention called "the internet"
but whatever, i have no time to argue...think what you want.
Youre right...good line by vegas setting that clemson total at 55. 2 tds in the 2nd half and its over, but hey, what do i know
Besides, nobody is saying you're not right, and there aren't totals that are way off. We're just saying its pointless to tell us at 4pm about off games that started at noon, and 2 other games that had 21+ points in the first quarter. This benefits noone.
Besides, nobody is saying you're not right, and there aren't totals that are way off. We're just saying its pointless to tell us at 4pm about off games that started at noon, and 2 other games that had 21+ points in the first quarter. This benefits noone.
Besides, nobody is saying you're not right, and there aren't totals that are way off. We're just saying its pointless to tell us at 4pm about off games that started at noon, and 2 other games that had 21+ points in the first quarter. This benefits noone.
i never claimed to be giving advice or making a beneficial post. I simply made a statement. These lines are waaay off. My post stemmed from frustration. Frustration not because i bet on the wrong side but because......ehhhh nevermind, i dont really have to spell it out or you.
Besides, nobody is saying you're not right, and there aren't totals that are way off. We're just saying its pointless to tell us at 4pm about off games that started at noon, and 2 other games that had 21+ points in the first quarter. This benefits noone.
i never claimed to be giving advice or making a beneficial post. I simply made a statement. These lines are waaay off. My post stemmed from frustration. Frustration not because i bet on the wrong side but because......ehhhh nevermind, i dont really have to spell it out or you.
Last year was the worst year for books. Totals hitting Overs, top teams covering the spreads. Now the games that you speak of that are going Over are actually "under plays" and books getting lucky.
Last week's ND/Pitt had Under written all over it. Anyone with half a brain would be on the Under. Went into OT for an Over. Cost me a $45,400 parlay payout.
Last year was the worst year for books. Totals hitting Overs, top teams covering the spreads. Now the games that you speak of that are going Over are actually "under plays" and books getting lucky.
Last week's ND/Pitt had Under written all over it. Anyone with half a brain would be on the Under. Went into OT for an Over. Cost me a $45,400 parlay payout.
i never claimed to be giving advice or making a beneficial post. I simply made a statement. These lines are waaay off. My post stemmed from frustration. Frustration not because i bet on the wrong side but because......ehhhh nevermind, i dont really have to spell it out or you.
Why would you be frustrated about off lines? Bet them and win money. And who breaks thought mid statement without pressing backspace lol? You trying to be clever? You're not speaking. Getting midway through a thought and deciding against it can be removed. Typing that way just looks obnoxious.
i never claimed to be giving advice or making a beneficial post. I simply made a statement. These lines are waaay off. My post stemmed from frustration. Frustration not because i bet on the wrong side but because......ehhhh nevermind, i dont really have to spell it out or you.
Why would you be frustrated about off lines? Bet them and win money. And who breaks thought mid statement without pressing backspace lol? You trying to be clever? You're not speaking. Getting midway through a thought and deciding against it can be removed. Typing that way just looks obnoxious.
Why would you be frustrated about off lines? Bet them and win money. And who breaks thought mid statement without pressing backspace lol? You trying to be clever? You're not speaking. Getting midway through a thought and deciding against it can be removed. Typing that way just looks obnoxious.
Why would you be frustrated about off lines? Bet them and win money. And who breaks thought mid statement without pressing backspace lol? You trying to be clever? You're not speaking. Getting midway through a thought and deciding against it can be removed. Typing that way just looks obnoxious.
Last year was the worst year for books. Totals hitting Overs, top teams covering the spreads. Now the games that you speak of that are going Over are actually "under plays" and books getting lucky.
Last week's ND/Pitt had Under written all over it. Anyone with half a brain would be on the Under. Went into OT for an Over. Cost me a $45,400 parlay payout.
you lost a parlay & are crying about it? i wish i could bet on that happening multiple times a week.
Last year was the worst year for books. Totals hitting Overs, top teams covering the spreads. Now the games that you speak of that are going Over are actually "under plays" and books getting lucky.
Last week's ND/Pitt had Under written all over it. Anyone with half a brain would be on the Under. Went into OT for an Over. Cost me a $45,400 parlay payout.
you lost a parlay & are crying about it? i wish i could bet on that happening multiple times a week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.