Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
The line dropped to Ball St -6.5 & because Ark St's QB will Kennedy will play. Regardless, Ark St is from the Sun Belt Conference. Ball St should take care of business. I have no clue why the O/U dropped to 63' Ball St -6/5 & over |
Covers | 35 |
|
|
Maryland from a better conference. Maryland +2.5 & under 62.5 |
Covers | 29 |
|
|
Alien-1, I think you should write about gambling. I sure would buy one or two. When I was a youngster, I bought a small pocket book called "THE TEN COMMANDMENTS OF HOYLE". I can't remember them all but some I think is very important to follow e.g. 1) Know the game before playing. 2) Money management. 3) Do not chase your money. 4) Do not mix drinking with gambling. I think MONEY MANAGEMENT is # 1 |
Alien-1 | 141 |
|
|
HERE'S ANOTHER ONE PAC-12 vs WAC (SAME THING MWC WAC) USC AS MUCH AS -9 |
Covers | 46 |
|
|
Would Colorado State be in a bowl game if they played in the PAC 12? On paper CSU looks good (just like Hawaii with Colt Brennen when they played Georgia In the Sugar Bowl). Taking WSU |
Covers | 32 |
|
|
I don't blame Mike S. for benching RGIII. RGIII should have been benched a long time ago. He has no peripheral vision of the field. He would rather run with the ball thinking he is still a college football player.
|
Covers | 25 |
|
|
Navy beat Hawaii by 14 points, Hawaii beat Army by 7. Navy will beat Army by 12 points.
|
Covers | 54 |
|
|
Offensively New Orleans is ranked 3rd & Seattle 12th. Defensively Seattle is ranked 2nd & New Orleans 5th. The Saints scoring average 27.7 points for & 17.8 points against. Seahawks average 27.8 pts for & 16.3 pts against. The public has raised the line to 6 to 7 points. It is known fact that the Saints are not the same team away from home. Looking at the above stats, I think the defenses will show up keeping the total to about 44 points. Seattle should win having the crowd yelling their guts out, but not cover the 6 points. New Orleans plus 6 & under 47
|
Covers | 79 |
|
|
Why is #10 so South Carolina giving points to #6 Clemson?
|
Covers | 13 |
|
|
Does 3rd down conversion mean anything for the offense? I think it keeps the drive going for a score. Navy's 3rd down conversion running the ball can keep San Jose's offense on the bench. I like the under 59.5 and Navy winning outright. |
Covers | 41 |
|
|
I HOPE COVERS WOULD BAR MGM FORM POSTING. HE THINKS HE WORK FOR NASA BECAUSE HE'S ONLY OCCUPYING SPACE (SPACE PROGRAM) |
Covers | 232 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by omb1: I agree with you. There are too many over grown cry kids trying to get their attention. It was their betting choice, but when they lose, it is like the NO FAULT INSURANCE you fault.
I cannot believe the willful ignorance I see throughout these forum threads... The games are played. The coaches coach and the players play. Occasionally a referee call on the field might make a big impact. But this talk of Illuminati and the National Fixed League smacks of LOSERS who are sore about losing their bets. IT IS RIDICULOUS. RIDICULOUS. RIDICULOUS. With that being said - give me Atlanta +9.5 as a divisional home dog on a short week. Give me the under 53 as well - that's a stupid high total. If I lose I lose. I'm not about to blame some mysterious all-powerful group that doesn't exist.
New Orleans can give up to 17 points to Atlanta, but I'm glad to give the 10 points and go under 53.
|
Covers | 232 |
|
|
My first thought was to play the over. But, with the wind howling @ about 28 MPH, that change my plan. Both teams will use their running game and short passing, nothing deep. The Bears -3 & under 42.5 |
Covers | 21 |
|
|
THIS GAME IS TOTALLY RIGGED. HANDS TO THE FACE CALLED AGAINST WASHINGTON NEGATED A TD. THE REPLAY CLEARLY SHOWED NO HANDS TO THE FACE.
|
Covers | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by inkadoo:
I'm confused what should I do? My advise is to go to where you can buy info magazines, reading materials (GOLD SHEET, POINTWISE, etc) you'll get a lot of information. If you like to surf the web, go to DONBEST.COM, you'll get the opening lines & lines from different venues. THEN YOU DECIDE. FOLLOW YOU HUNCHES. GOOD LUCK |
Covers | 68 |
|
|
My local has it as UCLA 1 /12 HT, 3 game & no OU. Defense wins games, so taking the points Washington HT & GAME. The OU is within the ball park (58 to 60) my guess is to take the under (finding another local) |
Covers | 68 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stevopa:
Again, a pick without write up from this guy. BTW, going against the public tonight in CFB resulted in an 0-2 record so your brilliant idea seems less brilliant now. Hey, BABOOZE! Where is your write-up? This should be a good game to watch. I'm leaning on the HUSKIES because of their defense. Offensively, both have balance on the run & pass. I'll wait until the morning to see if the line goes up or down.
|
Covers | 68 |
|
|
Last week both teams lost. Indy lost to the RAMS. Tennessee lost to Jacksonville. Between the two winners last week, I believe the RAMS is a better team. The line opened at -3 Indy, now it's -1. I guess the Vegas lines makers think Tennessee's defense is better and the offense is about the same plus the Titans are @ home. My gut feeling is that Indy is a better team beating SF, SEATTLE & DENVER. COLTS -1 & UNDER 43 LOTS OF LUCK TO ALL & BELIEVE IN WHATEVER YOU THINK. |
Covers | 115 |
|
|
Best bet is a NO PLAY or go under 47.
|
Covers | 28 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.