Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
This seals it for Obama. A Romney tax plan that actually raises taxes on the middle class, while slashing them for the wealthy coupled with Ryan's known desire to cut all social safety nets is absolute political suicide. Game over.
|
FrontRowCenter | 89 |
|
|
LMAO. Romney just said "We're gonna keep healthcare affordable".
Uh Mitt, I got news for Ya. |
kaplan | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by marcbryanjacob:
Just got a call returned and the bill is on schedule to be passed in the next couple weeks. Just before the Senate summer recess. Then it will be up to Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation and Caesars to get it ramped up as soon as possible. There will be plenty of incentive to hurry, as B.C. and N.J. look ready for some football!
Thanks for the update. |
bigbill365 | 61 |
|
|
Is there anything more confusing than the tea Party. They have these groups with wonderful names like "liberty council", "liberty express", "American Freedom Council" and so forth. But yet they are totally cool with Citizen's United which enables the Super Wealthy even more power to buy our goverment and deny them their beloved liberty. They carry around those wonderful "Give Me Liberty" signs but support the purchase of our goverment by the rich. It's so pathetic it's almost Sad. CU has done more to deny these Tools their liberty than anything.
|
Stiln | 15 |
|
|
I looked into it. The fee's are very high. It's like playing at -130. |
chips1031 | 2 |
|
|
You ain't getting paid........accept it.
|
deydeydiaz | 19 |
|
|
Coming on the internet looking for a collection man.........
|
deydeydiaz | 19 |
|
|
With this and NJ, I think we have hope of one day being able to get down legally outside of vegas.
Thoughts? |
winonsaturday | 3 |
|
|
Of course a mid 50's redneck couple in Alabama with the ol lady in her flannel PJ's has better sex than an upwardly mobile hip couple in Hartford with a hot female sporting some fredrick's lace under her slinkie dress.
It goes without saying. |
bowlslit | 31 |
|
|
"Democrats have better Sex Than Republicans" Who woulda thunk it. |
promark12 | 15 |
|
|
|
DavidGurney | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by promark12:
I've seen Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and many others claim we need JOBS. But all that is is a sound bite. Does anybody know anybody's outline on how we can get more JOBS? I mean they utter this phrase and then go on to the next question. It's like it's something you're supposed to say. I'm not an expert here, but I'd expect the politicians to be more concerned with job creation, than campaign donation creation,
Clearly not an expert. |
promark12 | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by zcoach99:
Don't feel sorry for them. They get what they deserve. You get kicked in the mouth for 8 years and then flip out when Obama hasn't fixed everything in 5 months. So you vote in a bunch of nutwads who think American's should work for peanuts so a few can benefit. Republicans support the idea of Corporations buying our goverment. I almost hope the "Fuck America" Republicans win everything this time around so all the clueless fools' who support crazy ass shit like "Citizen's United" can feel the wrath. The bad thing about the tea Fucks is 90% of them have no idea what "Citizen's United" is. They think they are voting for a bunch of "liberty" Pol's. These so called liberty guys are in favor of selling their soul's and the rest of our fucked up Gov't to the highest bidder.
Nailed it. |
promark12 | 21 |
|
|
It was obvious from the start who was pulling the strings on this laugher. Did these defenders of liberty not realize the people who got it going was the stock market channel and a lifelong Republican Pol who was more heavily tied to the corprocrats than anybody else in Gov't?
They preyed on the weak of mind, as usual. I went to one Tea Party function. I left when my Wife's uncle told me about the Dem's wanting to get rid of social security. I know some TP members have the right idea, but I estimate that about 85% are completely lost as it relates to any understanding of actual policy and what the real problem is in this declining nation. |
promark12 | 21 |
|
|
look at the percentage of Dem's who served compared to the republican percentages. Kind of eye opening.
Almost the entire Bush regime were multiple deferrment Chicken hawks. WMD's baby. |
promark12 | 22 |
|
|
Remember when Perry kicked off his campaign with that "Day of Prayer" in Texas. LMAO. Now he endorses the "open marriage" candidate. It doesn't get much nuttier than this bunch. |
dytide | 7 |
|
|
A flat tax is the way to go if they eliminate the loop hole for capital gains. 20% tax on capital and labor. Eliminates the loop holes that allow the super rich to escape paying their share. When it's all said and done, I pay around 23% most year's. Why the heck should Romney be paying less?
|
kaplan | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tsw:
The line will not be moving down.
Wrong again . |
Biscuiteater1 | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by promark12:
Of course Democrats will vote for Obama. Just like many of you guys will blindly vote for Romney. What is the difference? Good point. |
SarasotaSlim | 309 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AcerRubrum:
Want to enact change? Stop campaign contributions, kick out lobbyists and PAC groups, create a tangible wall that keeps corporations out. TODAY!..... Now now we can't do that. The conservative's on the SC decided that corporations are people and that would be against their rights as granted by the United States constituition. As laughable as that sounds, that's the kind of thinking you get from Republican appointed justices. If a law was passed to end the criminal influence that is bought by lobbyist', the corporations would sue and Alito and the boys would rule in their favor against the will of the so called free "American People". |
winonsaturday | 67 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.