Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by composite: pretty easy Kershaw looks on form + Doyers crush RHP, HFA not as valuable in MLB just ask Moses Alou and Steve Bartman how much home field advantage has helped the cubs
Why is everyone assuming Kershaw will win? Hendricks was almost as equally dominant in G2 allowing only 1 run off an HR. And he's been great all year. Plus, Kershaw has historically been unable to be effective past 7 innings. And the game is in Chicago. I'm not saying Kershaw/Dodgers will lose but I don't understand why they're favored. |
undermysac | 18 |
|
|
replied to
The 2016 baseball playoffs are absolutely kicking my *ss and I love Toronto today!!
in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by RAID187: who you like in the NLCS game? |
buffer | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Europa: `I agree with you, Cubs better hit it good tonight. Chances are, if they lose this game they're toasted in this series. But Cubs will take back the home field advantage if they win tonight. It's a 2-3-2 playoff format, Gm 5 is in LA, *potentially with CK pitching, Game 6 if the series extends that far would be the next time Cubbies have HFA #TheMoreYouKnow
|
Europa | 32 |
|
|
|
KingMidasTouch | 25 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: I have a max bet on Dallas today when it hit dead PK. Definitely my biggest wager today - only 2 other NFL wagers this size so far this season. And to top it off - the whole contest is on AZ - but that is at +3.5.
lol @ betting on Weeden, hope yo momma don't raise the rent on that basement suite vansuck
|
rudy22 | 104 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TruthHurtzDeGen: Geheheh, everyone on this jinx site loves the Over, i know what that means....UNDER/Pack+6 it is....BAM |
Covers | 138 |
|
|
Lance Easleys Primetime Revenge special
Seattle held ARodg to 223 yards 0TDs by virtue of 8 sacks (4 of which came directly from Chris Clemons - now playing for Jacksonville) in a 12-14 game that the Packers were winning 12-7 in the final seconds until a hail-mary pass from Russell Wilson was juggled around and eventually incorrectly called a touchdown for a 14-12 final by veteran referee Lance Easely. Not an NFL veteran, no good ol' Lance got his big time TV experience whistling games for tiny Allan Hancock Community College in Santa Maria, CA. Lance was a dubious replacement ref filling a slot for an actual real NFL referee during their labor strikes. Easily forgotten after the real NFL refs got their contract the next week and it was business as usual. One team who hasn't forgot that loss was Green Bay, with the resulting loss in all likelihood potentially costing them a Superbowl appearance vs the Ravens when they ended up 11-5 for the season instead of 12-4 tied with San Francisco for the NFC, in which SF held the better divisional record which ultimately garnered them a home game in SF instead of in Green Bay which as anyone can attest holds one of the best homefield advantages in the whole NFL come wintertime. This to me spells R-E-V-E-N-G-E for Green Bay and with the Seahawks defensive scheme in question in regards to the new NFL stance on calling more penalties vs rough defenses and throw in the fact that everyone and their mother is on the Superbowl champs tonight, its easy for me to see the value in the Pack tonite, GL to all this is the calm before the storm gentlemen
|
baller909 | 8 |
|
|
cant see how this game doesnt end up in the 60s with these two "defenses?"
|
Covers | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mak104: In their first game of the next season, title-defending teams sport a record of 10-0-0 su.Bodes well for Seattle.I just have a felling it's gonna be a high scoring affair. TOTAL BS
I only had to go back one year to prove this lobotamy victim wrong....defending champs Ravens lose SU week 1 to Denver 27-49 in 2013 do you people just make stats up out of thin air to try to make yourself look good? cause I think it makes you look like a fool |
Covers | 138 |
|
|
•Dolphins: Ryan Tannehill, Matt Moore, Pat Devlin, Brock Jensen.
•Falcons: Matt Ryan, T.J. Yates, Sean Renfree. •Bills: E. J. Manuel, Thad Lewis, Jeff Tuel, Dennis Dixon. •Panthers: Cam Newton, Derek Anderson, Matt Blanchard, Joe Webb. •Buccaneers: Josh McCown, Mike Glennon, Mike Kafka, Alex Tanney. •Jaguars: Chad Henne, Blake Bortles, Ricky Stanzi. •Saints: Drew Brees, Luke McCown, Ryan Griffin. •Rams: Shaun Hill, Austin Davis (BRADFORD OUT) •Eagles: Nick Foles, Mark Sanchez, Matt Barkley, G.J. Kinne. •Bears: Jay Cutler, Jordan Palmer, Jimmy Clausen, David Fales. •Raiders: Matt Schaub, Derek Carr, Matt McGloin, Trent Edwards. •Vikings: Matt Cassel, Christian Ponder, Teddy Bridgewater. |
toddmc9136 | 5 |
|
|
under 179.5 and 176.5 Indy wins are usually correlated to the under
|
johnnyrudeboy | 22 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by QBUN: Still under investigation....LoL man the concept was great, but they just got greedy and didn't follow the system they had established. Oh yea and ran off with a bunch of $$$$... great results so far Q, very considerate of you to keep this thread going, I wonder was the above ever confirmed? I and another friend were in the investment group last year and while I thought it was a great group of people except maybe for that one shady guy I forget his name... it did seem somewhat wierd that instead of chasing the same dogs for a series they switched to chasing random totals and sides, luckily for me I avoided their big downswing as I a had basically had enough of their formula and was concentrating on NBA playoffs at the time Not accusing anyone of anything but after they went bust it got me thinking about all the guys that try to start these private forums off of covers; easiest scam in the world really - what would stop anyone from doing it again and again?, They convinced a 100 of us to send $300 to a random paypal account and we had no other way to contact them except online to an email, who can be sure a bet was ever even placed? who knows if that $30,000 deposit to an online book ever happened? Why couldn't someone just "airbet" -EV wagers until they tanked locking up a $30k profit for the season? I never really thought about it until I saw the sucess of this thread, anyway not trying to stir anything up just was curious, best of luck guys lets bless this thread with the POSITIVE VIBRATIONS of my man Bob Marley https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57PYv2fBIhI Live from the Bowl in sunny Santa Barbara (1979) been there many times
|
QBUN | 1368 |
|
|
not like Seattle is running up a lot of runs lately....Houston is 2-0 against Felix this year they beat Seattle 7-2 and 5-4.....I'll take +220 odds on it happening again
|
QBUN | 1368 |
|
|
https://www.strikeout.co/baseball/228172/1/tampa-bay-rays-vs-oakland-athletics-live-stream-online.html
|
Jarrett75 | 35 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by motorcitymama: Nursery rhymes!!!!! I am reading back on this particular thread, and you had NO negative comments at all!!! Why post the nursery rhyme?? You are in love with yourself!!! You are pathetic, attention-seeking little baby. and you are on the same forum hiding behind your computer screen calling people names! Sounds like another case of the pot calling the kettle black here at covers....how shocking
|
mikeru3 | 54 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by whodamanny76: Hahaha...no one said anything about a conspiracy. I simply stated one department acknowledged an issue, another department denied responsibility and I was left with a case of bad customer service. would you even have made this thread if the bet won? I doubt it. Also it says you live in Nevada, why would you use an offshore book with crappy lines like Bookmaker if in Nevada? Location: Nevada |
whodamanny76 | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe: In this case, it was not a matter of -120 vs -140. It was a 4-1 game in the third period, and they had the lines reversed, so it was probably more like +1200 vs -1200. Is that line shopping or betting into a known bad line? read the whole thing, the guy himself told 5 dimes it was a mistake so they could fix it and then they seized his whole balance because "he was betting a bad line" seems like if its that big of a problem 5 dimes could take some of that money that they have siezed from players and hire a more qualified person to enter the halftime lines rather than siezing the funds and banning players whose only crime is taking a bet that the oddsmaker put on the board all the guys here at covers dont really need to worry, 5 dimes will never close most guys accounts just the few that actually do win
|
Jailbait7127 | 95 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe: How would you act if someone tried to rip you off? the only reason 5 dimes can call this a rip off is because they write their own rules that say it's a rip off, in Nevada if I can get Team A at -120 when everyone else has -140 it's called "good line shopping" you have a winning ticket they have to cash it, doesn't matter if they wrote you a bad line 5 dimes now has basically a freeroll on any big winners at their site, if you lose great - no worries....if you win they comb through your records and look for some technicality to f k you out of your WHOLE balance not just the "misplaced" bet, f k Tony and f k Bookmaker the whole bookmaking business outside of Pinnacle has been usurped by these spineless cowards that will take in all the money in the world but don't pay out
|
Jailbait7127 | 95 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BET2WIN4: Still around? LMAO! Still got somethin to PROVE huh? Indy worst lean ever! Miami gona rape those wana Bs Quote Originally Posted by Frank_White: 5/18: Indiana +2.5 1100/1000 Indiana ML +125 500/625 5/19: San Antonio -6 1100/1000 San Antonio ML -275 2750/1000 San Antonio 2H -1/2 550/500 ah, this explains it Rookie Joined: Feb 2014 |
Frank_White | 191 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive:
I see about 10 NO WAY the HEAT can lose tonight threads. There are many many many ways the Heat can and might lose tonight. This game will be close, and I think they win and cover, but there is a possibility they lose. If any one could send the Heat home down 0-2 it is Joey Crawford |
bobmaloogatimesfive | 14 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.