Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
SD will probably lose a close one here, but there's a lot of value in +210. |
olga51 | 2 |
|
|
Definitely kinda risky. Dodgers slept through the last week of the season and could have rust. Meanwhile, the Pads are en fuego. I'd cap this at LAD -140, -250 if nuts. |
IAintGonLie | 4 |
|
|
Sure I'll give it to you. You probably can't load more than $5K on this, but James Madison should destroy Arkansas State as a 11 point favorite. JMU haven't played a complete game yet and the results have still be impressive. The final should be something like Madison 41 Ark St 13 pending weather conditions. |
legguy69 | 123 |
|
|
The umpire is screwing Manaea. |
rohart | 13 |
|
|
Fun fact, Joe Buck nearly died in surgery getting hair implants. Seriously. |
Kep131313 | 5 |
|
|
In Vegas, parlay payouts are capped at 300-1. Not sure if it’s the same online but I’d imagine so. |
melossinglet | 3 |
|
|
I was moments away from taking the Rams but didn’t. Good grief what a nightmare. |
snowman76 | 4 |
|
|
@asmth14 Not entirely true. If the total is low and you have a large spread it’s likely the favorite will not cover. The range of outcomes where they can cover in a low scoring outcome are small. Kinda like betting the run line favorite and the under in baseball. There are very few outcomes that result in a win for both bets. |
WeirdHenry | 42 |
|
|
Is it not allowed to parlay the series prices? I want the Rays -160 Houston -130 in a parlay but there doesn't seem to be an option on MGM. Anyone? |
smwhrinthedrkns | 2 |
|
|
Sucks may be hyperbole, but he’s fully capable of imploding at any time. |
qtien | 10 |
|
|
Astros lose in 6, book it. |
showtime0811 | 13 |
|
|
Fellas - Trouble finding series prices for the first round? Obviously there won't be any for WC opponents, but shouldn't the Chi vs HOU and MIL vs ATL be up? |
smwhrinthedrkns | 8 |
|
|
Is miami going to lose 3-0? |
Mancity | 35 |
|
|
P |
Redxff77 | 11 |
|
|
Any nfl game thats more than -6 is a bit of a crap shoot. Before the game starts, It seems obvious that they’ll cover. But a couple 3 and outs or an opposition TD to start the game makes the cover so much harder. You need TDs, FGs won’t do. Any team that isn’t Brady-calibre needs to play a perfect game to win a game like this easily. Not saying they don’t get it done, but your one disastrous play from being totally screwed. Washington just hasn’t been bad enough and Allen has been under-performing. If you want my 2 cents, AZ is a better play if you want to lay the chauk. Jacksonville just looks way more susceptible to being crushed. |
Redxff77 | 11 |
|
|
Any nfl game thats more than -6 is a bit of a crap shoot. Before the game starts, It seems obvious that they’ll cover. But a couple 3 and outs or an opposition TD to start the game makes the cover so much harder. You need TDs, FGs won’t do. Any team that isn’t Brady-calibre needs to play a perfect game to win a game like this easily. Not saying they don’t get it done, but your one disastrous play from being totally screwed. Washington just hasn’t been bad enough and Allen has been under-performing. If you want my 2 cents, AZ is a better play if you want to lay the chauk. Jacksonville just looks way more susceptible to being crushed. |
Redxff77 | 11 |
|
|
Just FYI, you never want to bet a big favorite and the under, you're asking to lose. The math just doesn't work. In order to win both bets, you need Dallas to stay under 21 points and TB to stay under 30 while still keeping a 9.5 spread. There are very few scoring permutations that win both bets. The old Vegas rule is that if you're laying more than 3 and you want action on the total, you gotta bet the over.
Just some friendly advice. |
jjnow | 6 |
|
|
Ballarmine Knights -8. |
smwhrinthedrkns | 1 |
|
|
Also played last night, and played like they spent the afternoon at Patty's pub? |
Twecar59 | 19 |
|
|
@Tedcyclone You wouldn't kick the extra point to go up by 2, they'd go for the 2-pt conversion. |
Tedcyclone | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.