Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
shows what you know parlay... i already said long ago that Obama is a virtual sure thing to win...
why don't you argue with any of my points, instead of just making 3 statements that are 100% untrue?
is it because, like many Democrats, your only means of debate is irrational attacks and insults, instead of hitting on the truth?
congrats on making your party look like a bunch of clowns...
nice job insulting my avatar though... i guess you're right... we should vote for Obama...
|
be easy | 61 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by shepherd:
Eli is #3... that will be more obvious to everyone by the end of the year... its all about game management and not making mistakes...
right now, Eli is only behind Peyton and Brady (when healthy)... |
adamsmsu | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by adamsmsu:
carson palmer simply shouldn't be on anyones list... roethlisberger simply shouldn't be on anyones list...eli shouldn't be on anyones list.. let's try that again... it is time to bump this thread, now that we are 1/4 way into the season and my crazy post that Eli needs to be at or near the top of this list can no longer be denied by any self-respecting football fan... |
adamsmsu | 69 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by adamsmsu] carson palmer simply shouldn't be on anyones list... roethlisberger simply shouldn't be on anyones list... eli shouldn't be on anyones list...
/Quote] |
adamsmsu | 69 |
|
|
Will... that's the thing that bothers me... the dog in the series usually covers, but Wake has almost always been the dog in recent years... back in the 90's it was more 50/50... the home team was always favored and the road dog always covered and usually won...
so its hard to say if that trend still holds true, especially with Clemson being a dog for the first time in a long time...
still, seems like a spot for Clemson...
|
Mr_Covers | 328 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:
so did Saul Alinsky read Rules for Radicals to learn more about where Obama comes from.... just realized what book this is... was thinking it was a different one a friend had told me about, but you're the second person to mention this one... i'm gonna have to look into it... |
be easy | 61 |
|
|
Koaj... so did Adolf Hitler...
i don't need to read that to know what you're getting at, because unlike most of the sheep voters in this country, i intensely investigate the candidates...
so i already know exactly what that will say... and i love the fact that you posted it... in fact, i have been to the country where his father was born, and i have been to the country where he was raised as a child, so i know all about those countries and some of the fanatical practices that go on there... i will say no more... people need to learn to start thinking for themselves...
but this is for you Koaj... just saw this story hot off the presses... i was just telling a friend of mine that every President we have elected for the past 30 years has been the candidate who raised way more money... i also noted how strange it was when i first saw Obama's name at the top of the Democratic nominee polls right out of the gate, even though he was up against all of the biggest names of the Democratic party...
but i soon heard about the fact that he had simply raised far more money than the other nominees... and i wondered... hmmm, where did all of that money come from?
consider this in the context of what you (and very few others) already know about Obama...
WASHINGTON - The Republican National Committee plans to file a fundraising complaint against Democrat Barack Obama's presidential campaign Monday, alleging it has accepted donations that exceed federal limits as well as illegal contributions from foreigners. RNC officials acknowledged Sunday that they do not have a list of foreign donors to Obama's campaign. Instead, the complaint is based largely on media reports, including one from the conservative Web site Newsmax. The complaint asks the Federal Elections Commission to audit Obama's campaign fund, RNC chief counsel Sean Cairncross said in a conference call with reporters. Cairncross said little is known about many of Obama's donors because the campaign is not required to disclose detailed information about people who give less than $200. The Obama campaign, which is not accepting public funds, has raised more than $468 million. About half has come from small donors, a point of pride for the Obama campaign. The Obama campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment." |
be easy | 61 |
|
|
one more example... i will sometimes bet a game i had no intention of betting simply because the line is off and there is no good reason for it being that far off... but i keep those plays small, along with other "system" plays...
three lines that are way off this week... Cincy vs. Rutgers, MTS vs. Fla Int, and Vandy vs. Miss St... had no intent of betting those games, and they won't be strong bets, but unless i can find some reason those lines are so far off, i will consider them...
|
shepherd | 180 |
|
|
sup Sammy... tough question to answer... can only say i am using the term "system" much differently than most people...
playing on LSU against Miss St is a system play...
betting blindly on the elite teams every single week for the entire year is a system play i have posted every week on this thread... (31-7-2 so far this season... should come down to earth the rest of the way)
always betting on a certain team at home and against them on the road could be a system play...
other people call these trends... i don't care about trends... trends are just fluctuations away from the norm, and if you are jumping on a 10-2 trend, there is a good chance it is setting up for a 2-10 return to the norm... on the other hand, systems are angles that i consider to be the norm... of course, you also have to know when a system is no longer in effect...
|
shepherd | 180 |
|
|
so DD... are you calling for a blowout? what's your predicted score?
|
Mr_Covers | 214 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Wizard41:
Saty away from UVA, they have no offense and MD is much improved.
you're good... |
WahooS | 66 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Wizard41:
hedge your bet and take cash
let's hope he didn't listen to you... |
TREE88 | 37 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Wizard41:
Leaning on Utah this week against weak opponent
good call! |
TRoe15 | 39 |
|
|
not missing anything... UCF was a solid team last year (but not this year), and Miami got blown out for 3 quarters against FSU... i think people are just not looking at this game, which is exactly what i expected before the lines came out...
another overlook game is Mich-Toledo...
|
Mr_Covers | 11 |
|
|
good point cap... i definitely wouldn't be excited to bet against Missouri right now... i think even OU has to be wondering if this is the year Missou will finally close the gap...
|
Mr_Covers | 112 |
|
|
by the way, do you know why he refers to them as "Homes" instead of "Houses"... since you brought it up? calling them "Houses" is an appeal to reason... calling them "Homes" is an appeal to emotion... that is the modus operandi of one Barrack Obama, a man who has mastered the art of persuasion by tugging at the heart strings of his followers... a Harvard lawyer... this guy knows how to choose his words... that should scare people... |
be easy | 61 |
|
|
La La is good at scoring, and NT is good at letting them... that's my write-up for this game...
|
Mr_Covers | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ontheedge:
PLEASE READ THIS
You have to understand, when you bet on the Lions you are betting on the worst team in the NFL...actually, I take that back...You are betting on the worse team in Proffesional sports. There is no team that is worse then this one... nuff said... well done edge...
|
Mr_Covers | 63 |
|
|
not looking to talk anyone out of this... i agree that Missou is a contender, but i disagree that Ok St is a pretender or that they should be put in the same category as Nebraska...
i would have a real hard time betting against either of these teams right now... the Big 12 heavy hitters are playing the best football in the country right now...
|
Mr_Covers | 112 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by joewashington:
Tell you what....I'll give you the Sooners here and you give me 21.....I'm being really generous since you said you'd take the Sooners no matter what the line... i wouldn't mind getting in some teaser action on this one... Tx (+27) sound fair?
JW... i am really impressed when i watch McCoy... i wasn't the biggest fan, but his decision making is really incredible right now... guy seems like he can do no wrong...
not to say Bradford isn't playing great also... just a bit more impressed with McCoy...
i am really looking forward to watching this one... this is what CFB is all about!
|
Mr_Covers | 214 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.