Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
How is that 7.5 not begging for Packers money? Packer off a Skins BlowOut, Zona off a Blowout to Seatle....This line could very easily be the same 6 it was when these two teams played previously and the "Wise Men" would harvest loads of ZONA money....If that's what they truely wanted... This smells like a set-up to me....and wouldn't be surprised if this line hit 8 previous to game time in an effort to coax even more Greenbay money....Now if it starts to fall...6.5, 6.....We've got a different story. No play as of yet. |
Covers | 43 |
|
|
I consider the Houston to UCONN loss somewhat of a let-down scenerio, that's why I didn't include it in my previous post but this game could speak volumes about who Houston really is, as well.
|
Covers | 47 |
|
|
Houston beats Memphis by only 1 and gives up 34 . Houston beats Cinci by 3 and gives up 30....Houston plays tight with Temple winning by Ten.... Memphis gets pounded by Auburn, Cinci Pounded by SDS, and Temple pounded by Toledo....I know this rather abstract thinking but these are the most telling games for me regarding the overall talent level of Houston. Fla St - 7 is the Play |
Covers | 47 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Shark_Attack:
Obviously the public is not going to bury the books on this game... Syracuse will cover the spread... will take 3.5 or 4 IF/WHEN I can get it... I rarely post on here but I must ask after reading both of your posts? How do you compare ECU (committing 5 turnovers last week) to Duke (quite possibly the most mistake free team in college football) ??? Do you even watch the games dude? Or do you just make it practice to go against public favs, hoping for an upset, so you can look like you have some clue as to what your talking about....Or did you get burnt by ECU last week and this is your way of compensating for that? In any regard....Base your comments on facts rather than just trying to sound cool.... |
Covers | 39 |
|
|
I rarely post on here but I must say, this was straight tard comment....comparing ECU who had 5 turnovers last week to quite possibly the most mistake free team is college football....Really? Do you even watch the games dude? or do you just make it your practice to go against public favs, hoping for the upset, so you can look like you have the slightest clue as to what your talking about? Support your comments with facts bro and quit trying to just sound cool....POSER
Maybe so... but they could also be the ECU of last week, who everybody was also riding hard! [/Quote]
|
Covers | 39 |
|
|
And last years game, in the same venue, was a Thursday night game.....Maybe not as big as Monday night but still the only game is town...
|
Covers | 64 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
San Francisco is a top three (3) team in the NFL AND the best tight end in the league (Vernon Davis) is back tonight. On the other sideline, one of the Rams top defensive players (Chris Long) is out and the Rams are starting an undrafted free agent rookie signal caller and the line has remained solid at 3 points with just south of 82% of all the wagers in a PRIME TIME game are riding on a 9’ers cover…
This tells me one (1) of two (2) things… Either the Wise Men in Vegas have made too much money this month and they need to distribute some cash back into investors pockets OR they feel the Rams win this game.
I am scheduled to pick up a nice piece of change on tomorrow (settle up day) so I do NOT want to do anything silly here, but I can NOT resist partnering with the Wise Men in Vegas in this spot. With that being said, put me down for Saint Louis plus a field goal at the house for three (3) C-Notes AND Saint Louis ML (+170) for two (2) C-Notes please. Thanks!
Holt...I've been following you for quite some time now and highly respect your picks but I bought into this exact way of thinking when these two teams played last year in SL, it was almost the exact same scenario (numbers wise) and SanFran crushed them something like 35-11? What different about tonight's affair? |
Covers | 64 |
|
|
wow, was I just censored on my last post? I wrote sh**, not garbage. |
rucifer | 17 |
|
|
Hibbert's look can best be described as a 12 year old, with a raging hard on and garbage in his pants at the same time....Like he's hiding some embarrassing secret or something... and please....I'm not trying to offend Pacer fans.
|
rucifer | 17 |
|
|
No I'm not really a Miami fan, nor am I a hater.... I just truly feel that Hibbert is mildly retarded and has a creepy grin on his face 99% of the time.... It has nothing to do with any allegiance to any team.... Your thinking way too deep into this Kevmode
|
rucifer | 17 |
|
|
I don't think I'd trust him to change a five dollar bill...
|
rucifer | 17 |
|
|
Creepy grin Hibbert should be his name
|
rucifer | 17 |
|
|
I'm not joking though... I really think Hibbert is slow, mentally.... And he always seems to have that creepy grin on his face...lol
|
rucifer | 17 |
|
|
I've gotta say yes....lol!
|
rucifer | 17 |
|
|
Nessa...thanks for your explanation....as I said, was just curious about your thoughts on the pressure situation.
|
Nessa | 17 |
|
|
Please explain as to how the pressure is on the Pacers, when they still have one to give. The Wiz on the other hand are facing elimination once again in their own house... I'm not interested in your pick, just your explanation on the Pressure comment?
|
Nessa | 17 |
|
|
replied to
*** Washington Wizards @ Chicago Bulls - Game 5 - Biggest Card of the Season ***
in NBA Betting Wow...just followed this thread from page 1. Amazing to see how the tone changed after only one quarter of play....and how everyone suddenly knew NOT to take the bulls....LOL Bulls - 37 Wiz - 36 |
LeagueCapper | 190 |
|
|
|
LeagueCapper | 121 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sportschat:
Bodog is always excessive on the juice and fudge lines to favor the dog and the under because most people bet faves and overs Thanks for the info...figured something fishy there.. |
Covers | 41 |
|
|
So quick question and maybe I'm just new at this...but why on Bodog do they have Navy at +3 but listed at -135 on the money line? Should the Fav by in the negative on the money line? They have Sanjose at -3 and +115 on the money line? Does this make sense to anyone? because it sure doesn't to me?Should this suggest that they expect Navy to cover tonight? |
Covers | 41 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.