Recent Posts

Thread Author neilsy25 Post Entries
BellagioRunner
BellagioRunner
I see now .. not trying to cause any trouble, but Penn St has 2 losses in the past 2 years...so by just eliminating a team that loses, seems more like back-fitting the system, not sure that's the way to go, unless there is a specific reason or rationale behind these losses pertaining to Penn St only..,Anyway, good luck.
BellagioRunner
BellagioRunner
Hi BR

 Thanks for sharing the system. I have a question, why OMIT Penn St ?...thanks
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
just coors man...brewed in golden colorado with 100% Rocky Mountain water for a legendary taste...
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by m0rtgageguy:

It's even better when the records and units are made up and when the losing plays are ignored. Make me happy knowing some systems clown has to suck some fat person to pay his bookie while dragging other suckers down with him.

mortgage guy,.. i am as little a fan of jeffs "look at me i am the greatest" sh*t as you are..but at least make sense if you are going to bash..a chase loss is not a loss until all 5 games lose..otherwise it is not a loss..it is still in progress..chases absolutely can be profitable..just not this one...
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by Bart_:


Teenage girl beer? hehe. j/k

Bloody Ottawa beat my Leafs today. 

ya..always nice to beat the Laffs, but i think neither of us are to pleased with this season..teenage girl ?..i said to much coors, not to much palm bay !!
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by LoxKid:

Sorry Neilsy if I'm not a rocket scientist like you are. I asked a simple question. If that makes you go into a bitter tirade take a valium

sorry bro..not aimed at you specifically, but its so simple to understand this "system", and even simpler to understand why it wont work long term..i dunno..maybe one to many coors...tonite
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by LoxKid:

Jeff, I guess I'm confused. I thought the MIA would be the A play and the CUBS would be B

god, you morons deserve to lose your money.. i will spell it out in simple steps for you

1) google sbr odds
2) go to sbr odds
3) look for very first mlb game listed
4) BET THE DOG +1.5


or if that is to hard..line up 4 dogs...throw a dart..bet that team, +1.5...either way, win short term..lose long term....
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by theseanl:

What would the unofficial play for tomorrow be?

as of right now i guess its the blue jays.. $2300 on the jays +1.5..lock and load...
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by fade-amd:

damn i chased again on bosox + rl got smoked

unofficial or official i lost loads of cash

wed twins lost 150
thurs twins lost 320
friday yankees lost 430
today sox lost 550

so i lost 1450 trying to make 100.

unreal


ya but it was an "unofficial" play ...see these and the "tracking" plays only count when they win,otherwise, hey it was just unofficial and tracking..
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


What's really a joke is clowns like you coming into threads with nothing to say! 

actually he came into your thread with a well articulated mathematical breakdown explaining why a "system" of picking games based on rotation may appear to be succesful in the short term, but in the long tern will not be succesful, instead of a well articulated response, you went with " if you're a hater and you know it clap your hands" ...funny as well how you assume we are all broke, because we don't jump on a bandwagon chasing -150 odds 5 deep based on a rotation number...
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


5 so far, but remember all the genius'  said it wouldn't work. We must be due for 20+ losses in a row! 

nah , wont take 20 losses in a row..just 1 loss..to wipe out a whole seasons profit.and then some..guy comes in this thread earlier with just the facts of why this won't succeed long term, and you can only call him a hater , and the sheep, most of whom dont have the bankroll to chase this past a c game let alone an e game..all pile on....its comical how " the greatest system player in the world" cannot understand simple probability and statistics, and can only refute sound logic with insults...
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:

I'm curious how many people won 128 units in NHL this year betting to win 1 unit a game? I'm thinking zero! 

Jeff, i am not hear to bash your chase, but are being purposely misleading or  are you really this clueless about unit sizes ? .. i.e, if you are chasing -150 to 5 games, your unit size is obviously much less than that of a flat bettor, do you not agree ?. therefore to compare your 128 units in NHL to units won by a flat bettor is not even close to accurate  ..
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
For the sake of accurate record keeping, I see -166 for Cincy +1.5 today..so todays bet is 4.4units  to win 2.7 units ....
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Buster, you make us legitimate bashers look bad ...not sure why you dont get that a chase loss is when you lose 5 in a row in this case, and in this case WHEN it does lose 5 in  a row, months of winning will go down the drain
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
wonder how many people in this thread realize that chasing this to 5 games is gonna take easily 100-150 units...my guess is 99% get wiped out the first time this hits game 4 or 5....good luck ..
JEFFTHEHAT
JEFFTHEHAT
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

jeff the hat,do you know of any logical,tangible reason as to why these systems are successful being played as they are??i mean is there any type of corellation watsoever between the first up match-up of a game-day and strong performances by under-dog sides??....and have you ever done back-testing on 2nd game on the rotation,3rd,4th ???etc..??...........cheers 4 your reply mate

ya , its called probability  .... chase any games with -150 odds to 5 and you are going to win 20..30..40 in a row..you would be unlucky not to ...but then when the prorbability catches up, you will lose it all and then some... and it always will catch up. 

but then most of you retards in this thread cant even understand simple parameters or a simple chase, so i wouldnt expect you to understand probability.... good luck, most of you need it.
RandyRay
RandyRay
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:

Why does that bother you? I didn't realize I have to post what ever you want. If I  post for 30 days and it wins 100 -150 units I'm pretty sure nobody is going to cry.

Doesnt bother me a bit, have no intention of following a 6 game chase of -150 odds with no parameters given, The poster was asking for advice on how to play your "system" based on previous years result,s my opinion was that it is pointless trying to figure this out when  a full seasons results wont be posted... legitimate no ?

and 100 -150 units sounds good , but put it into reality, 100 units when you need 400 to play the system is no different then a 3% flat bettor being up 7 or 8 units..
RandyRay
RandyRay
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


That is quite astute of you, you are correct because it doesnt start until May and ends mid Sept. Not a full season! 

Zero chance Jeff posts from May till mid sept with these results
RandyRay
RandyRay
Quote Originally Posted by LarryB818:


If you look at some of the older forum threads, he has done it before.Many of them have.

actually no he hasnt..show me a full season posted by him
RandyRay
RandyRay
my opinion is that there is zero chance you are going to get a full season of picks from Jeff with these results ... 
Desktop View: Switch to Mobile View