Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I didn't think the replay was that crazy. It was pretty clear that Vogt needed to apply the tag. Even Frieman signaled it. Over looking possible now.
|
marclais | 7 |
|
|
No, I took it before the game, but after the first inning and really thinking about it, I can really see the under. Lots of game left though.
|
marclais | 7 |
|
|
I took the Oakland/Toronto over but I can't remember why now. Any chance this hits?
|
marclais | 7 |
|
|
Lame... LAME!!!
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
fudge!
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
0-2.... love that.
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
HOLY garbage!
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
Who is the A-hole screaming at his own pitchers?... that must be distracting.
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
That is quality baseball right there.
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
Early in the season I was unsure about Otero. Didn't really have a lot of confidence in him. But he has been stellar of late.
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
Looked like a strike to me.
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
Yeah buddy!
|
dkd29 | 224 |
|
|
I am an Oakland fan, so I am loving watching this game, but I know how you feel. I am the exact with the Giants. It doesn't matter if I bet on them, against them, over, under, run line. I ALWAYS lose. It started in 2010 when I bet against them all the way to their world series win. Ef the Giants!
|
JasonZyman | 18 |
|
|
This thread got me to take Providence 1H +4 for a pretty big bet (chasing). Thank you everyone.
|
Raidernator76 | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by yankeedoodle33: I am confused by this thread. I see a guy who keeps promoting a record 50 times a day, yet 90 percent of his plays are over 220 money lines. I have tracked every play and every time he gives a loser then he just posts an obvious 260 or 280 favorite and then say triple super duper.. he goes 5-5 1 day losing 3 big favorites on money line and says he won. He went 1-1 today with a 30 point loser and the other a 140 favorite that should have lost and he doesn't get 1 post about loser but 30 bumps on the winner. I mean 3 missed free throws by good senior free throw shooters. He lost a 300 favorite the other day by 30 points and never said a word . I have never seen a worse pick. Where did all the p eople go who were stating facts about this guy. Did he cry to covers and get them banned. Did you see what he tried to use as proof that he bets these games. Anybody could type that out. If you bet 6,000 dollars on a win how much was the -290 loser for. Print that ticket. Outrageous thread. What's so confusing about it? It is called chasing your money, and it works... right up until it doesn't. |
mikeru3 | 222 |
|
|
I feel like this all of the time. LOL. Especially early leads in College basketball. Also, late leads of around 10-13 with 5-7 minutes left are worth virtually nothing. As discomforting as UCLA's lead was, I am still glad I didn't bet Stanford... that feeling is worse.
|
slikstiks99 | 11 |
|
|
Damn it, Badlands. Thanks for the Miami under, but I've got Golden State big (for me).
|
badlands | 8 |
|
|
I rewatched the niner/seahawks games today and there is definitely mugging going on. I am thinking that they are putting the onus on the refs. Nobody wants to see the refs call 4 or 5 PIs during a game, and everyone knows it, including Seattle and including the Refs.
I am worried that the refs are going to give out a big PI call against Seattle (justified), then swallow their whistle the next 1 or 2 times because they don't want to affect the outcome too much. It is an interesting strategy, and I really do believe it is a strategy. Harbaugh already said something publicly about how the game will be affected by how much the refs let Seattle's secondary get away with... I'm hopeful that the league wants SF in the super bowl again, and the refs are instructed to call it if they see it. If so, this could be a 49er blowout. If not... nail biter. |
dimndimn | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by cropduster: Good enough reason. Indy beat the Broncos and the Broncos beat KC twice. There is no logical reason to support KC in this game. I agree with this. The only reason to bet KC here is speculation that KC didn't try when they last played. I am taking that victory, plus home field, plus the better quarterback to the window. |
AnthonyStarks | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CasperX22: This is probably the biggest coin flip game of the weekend. That said, KC really hasn't been motivated to play since Denver swept them, so I wouldn't put too much stock into their struggles down the stretch. Speaking of, KC hasn't had Justin Houston since week 12 and their pass rush is a whole new animal when they have Houston, Halo, and Poe rolling. Houston missed that first meeting btw. KC is just a Better team overall and that's why I see them winning this game although Andrew Luck is the golden child and could steal this game. This is about where I am at. I see them both as meh teams. I like that Indy has home field advantage, but I what I am really betting here is Luck over Smith. Luck is a winner, and I expect him to show it tomorrow. I also think that Philly/NO is the coin flip game of the weekend... who frickin' knows with those two clubs. |
EastsideBangers | 44 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.