Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
js4u | 3 |
|
|
The BIG money bettors in Nevada just pounded the Dolphins at -1 moving the line to -2.5 at most books. |
js4u | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by michaelehly: Blow me rookie!
There goes js4u,making demands and spewing poison onto other people's threads again,take a hike dude |
jimmydafreak | 346 |
|
|
Where the hell are the picks Jimmy! Saturday morning is just around the corner home boy! Get those picks posted. Some of us degenerates need some winning picks! Give me those "Best Bets" NOW!
|
jimmydafreak | 346 |
|
|
Freak: When are you plays posted for the week? Good run so far and good luck,
|
jimmydafreak | 186 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by McShady: NFL is also 0-1 thus far this week. Bad week for this line (-6.5). Are the 49ers next?
Anyone else glad I filtered out the CFB -6.5? 0-2 so far, maybe 0-4 |
McShady | 335 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Lyonking: Bad grammer, bad punctuation, and namecalling? ANYWAYS!
@js4u dude, go somewhere else, Ive been a follower of mcshady for some time now, the work that he does is so unappreciated by ppl like you, no bettor is gunna win every game, and it is his spreadhsheet, he is entitled to do what ever he so choosesand we get to take that info and make our picks based on his info, not that hard u have the power of ur own picks (ur fault u lost, dont blame others) , he is nice of us to lend it out for ppl like me to make a profit out of gambling on sports, and yes us "indians" are coming after you cuz we know how we value mcshady and boneheads like you ruin it, now i have to go back to my old ways of finding ways to win and do my own dirty work (as mcshadies work has so much time an dedicating in creating the ss), an now i do not have access to it, all i have to say is thanks so much ya bonehead, you ruined it for alot of ppl |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tailing: Why the namecalling?
hey mcshady i sent u an email hoping to keep part in spread sheet. great reference guide. got away from a certain other forum because all bs.dont want one dumb ass to screw it uo for everyone. thx |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by McShady: I accept that thanks. I just didn't expect to be body slammed. GL
The reason I shared my plays was I saw some good dudes struggling with wagers and cant get in a groove. I cant describe how easy I find Sportsbetting after forming a serious plan. I wish raising my kids and my profession was this easy, so I escape to this place to relax a bit. Im an educator and I know that some people cant be taught, but thought this game didnt apply to that theory |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
McShady | 265 |
|
||
McShady | 265 |
|
||
Quote Originally Posted by McShady: So what you are saying is if I post a trend that is 24-0 and I post a play for the trend and it loses....I then just find some filter to remove the play which will then make the trend still at 24-0?
How is it misleading people when everyrthing on there is a TRUE statement. I know u dont know how to come up with ur own winning formula. But this how its done. If a trend is 10-6 w/ NFL & CFB and u FILTER out a type of play (CFB) then the trend is 10-2. Wouldnt u like to know that moving forward?
You want to be spoon fed easy plays that win. I get it. But if u cant get over a couple losses that you chose and I NEVER endorsed. Whats your objective?
Are you serious? When people that are new to the spreadsheet look at the records they may think, shit, thats a great record, I think I may tail these plays....Then they lose a few and those plays and when they look at the spreadsheet, the games that they lost are then removed? Thats misleading people with the records that are located on the spreadsheet. I have a buddie that posts here in this thread daily and noticed this because he lost money with Louisville and Nebraska. A few days later he noticed the plays were removed. If you are going to do that then why keep a record and publish it? I have a undefeated trend and if I lose a play, I can find hundreds of ways to filter out the loss. I am honestly not trying to start trouble I just dont understand why this is happening. If the Vikings lose tonight is their going to be a filter applied that removes the loss? If Clemson loses tonight will there be a filter applied that removes the loss? Thats all I am trying to say. It's your baby and I understand that but I dont understand the harsh words when I ask and I don't understand no real explanation as far as the record keeping is concerned. Bottom line is it's misleading the reader that is viewing the spreadsheet for the first time or the first few times. Carry on, good luck tonight and the weekend. |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Would anyone like tosee th screenshot of the sheet with the 2 plays I mentioned including the date, and a screenshot of the spreadsheet with the plays removed after they lost? Thats all I am asking and it requires a simple explanation. Its funny that I get no answer but I just get treated like the step kid like the rest of you do if you dont agree with certain individuals. The asnwer I got was a spreadsheet being removed from view. Thats fine I have my own sheet but this is to funny.
|
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bettingbrothers: If you insert plays on a spreadsheet and a record of those plays, as he does, you cannot place plays on the sheet, and then when they lose, take them off. Especially when their is a record of such plays under each spread at the top. THATS MY POINT. Is it that hard to understand?
@js4u - Your argument of the plays being removed are fundamentally flawed. The "plays" on the spreadsheet are not plays. No one tells you to play them. They are one man's research. How he uses them are up to him. Let me see your spreadsheet... I still havent received a answer of why they were taken off of the sheet after they lost??????? |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet: Where in that quote does it say I made a play on the 49ers? Can you post that? I said a play on 49ers OR NO PLAY. Nice try again.
https://spaces.covers.com/blog/js4u/NFL/10152012-NFL-Strong-Team-Trends.html |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet: Thats not me buddie but nice try.
js4u says: 10/15/12 10:24AM With 2 even teams (SF/SEA) the line opened at -9 and that seems to tell me one thing. Why is the line so high? I see this as a 49er wager or nothing based solely on the opening line. |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by McShady: Did I cll you a fraud? Did I call you a loser? I simply asked a question and received no response but rather I was attacked by you and all the Indians. You still havent answered the question.
Its done. I fixed it so this scenerio wont happen again. Im a fraud and a loser. You win. Go away |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Newfie_Bullet: You just stepped on your own Dic_ bud. Ok now I have to call you out. You make a statement that I posted SF -9 which was a play supposively against a SS play right? OK, post the thread link and PROVE what you just said. Lets see how credible you are so the readers can see. I'll be waiting. Oh, and by the, no response is the same as posting false information.
Who played the spreadsheet and lost last weekend? What ss are you looking at? 52-11 but you lost on a number last week. Do you know how stupid you look? Seriously, just don't come hang out here. Have you posted a play here? How'd that SF-9 play you dropped on another posting do for you against SEA +7,5 set number? You knew of that trend play cause you were posting here about it yet recommended the opposite with SF-9 on the trends thread on another discussion. How many people lost on your false trend info with you touting SF-9 after you were aware of the set trend from being informed on this thread? You're nothing more than a charlatan, a poseur, bugger off.
|
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by westernrattler: I ASKED A IMPLE QUESTION AND ALL THE INDIANS COME TO DEFEND THE CHIEF.....
Hey jack a$$
Do you have nothing better to do then to come here and start sh@t.. If you don't like what happens here do come here..There are plenty of other sites to go to..You would fit in perfect at the lock thead on cbs. |
McShady | 265 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
If you can can use my SS for a positive purpose...email me your screen name and ill give access. Sorry if i dont recognize u... Lord, this is funny. I guess this thread is a communist thread? If anyone speaks up and asks a question they are removed from receiving information? Thats to funny. Sounds like a dictatorship to me.
|
McShady | 265 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.