Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
HAWKS FAN HERE IM WORRIED
|
Covers | 3 |
|
|
TEASING THE BULLS -3.5 AND UNDER 185
|
Covers | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jo14014: come on man you think a top team in the nhl is going to lose to the same terrible team over and over again? nothing about this matchup is telling me to take the huricanes
Carolina +220.... |
Covers | 7 |
|
|
It inst easy to beat the same team twice. This is gonna be a tough game for the Celtics but they're gonna come out strong, Celtics have to prove to be a playoffs contender and a win on the road here wouldn't get that done but it starts here.
|
Covers | 10 |
|
|
gentlemen dinner and drinks is on the blues tonight, DK bout you guys but its thursday and Im going with buffalo wild wings
|
Covers | 3 |
|
|
playing the hawks for ever home game till they lose
also under 1.5 1st p |
Covers | 4 |
|
|
Flyers -1/2 first period 140 Flyers -1/2 regulation -110
get after it and if you book allows you to give the hook for the first period i would i think ottowa has been down after every one of their first periods |
Covers | 6 |
|
|
i think the suns pull one out tonight
|
Covers | 13 |
|
|
I am from Chicago I just like betting on the game and I don't like the spread in this one so I normally just go with the under. I had a big parlay going with the bulls and the under on Saturday for the 1st half ( cause I probably wouldn't have remembered the second half) that lost I'm probably doing under for both half tonight
|
Covers | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MasterNBA: Idk I kind of like taking the bulls unders a long with any good defensive teams like the Celtics. I think the bulls highly rely on the defense over their offense the bulls o/u are 31/41 and thats after its gone over the past 7 of 10. I think this is a great position for an under. You are probably right though it is kinda of a coin flip it can go either way. GLWho care just toss the coin. Head is for Over and Tail for Under. I don't care the trend or stat. Under/Over |
Covers | 9 |
|
|
nelson and Richardson are doubtful but I like the Magic if they do play. Their playing great ball and have been owning the Knicks lately
If they don't play and you looking for a safe bet I'd look at the Bulls under |
Covers | 13 |
|
|
Well the way the bulls defense has been playing how can't you think the under is the safest play here? Past two meetings have been high scoring but I'm going with the under here fellas. Don't like giving double digit points maybe I'll take the bulls at half.
|
Covers | 9 |
|
|
Caps seem like a great play, losing three in a row to the same team??
|
Covers | 7 |
|
|
I feel a lot more comfortable taking the over then betting against the saints. Saints are going to put up numbers and their defense will give up points to the good offenses
|
Covers | 29 |
|
|
joedaddy thats not necessary c'mon mann
|
Covers | 50 |
|
|
Covers | 50 |
|
||
Chiefs have a great running game, clevland can have a great running game.Why is this spread one? Chiefs looked exelent on the ground but their passing attack is very sketchy matt cassels 10 for 22 with 68 aint going to cut it. So running and special teams basically sums up the whole chiefs win? Lets come up with some reasons why this spread is only 1 cause that is the questions thats on most peoples mind Well 1) They had 192 total yards which is not too impressive ( not including special teams which lets face it isn't going to be there every week) they had more return yards then they did total offense! 2) San Deigo shot themselves in the foot in this game, they had a great day on offense passing for 298 and phillip rivers was 22 for 39, fumbles hurt them this chiefs defense let them drive all over them the but SD was 4-15 on 3rd downs which was god awful 3) I like these backs for Clevland. Harrison could put up numbers hes explosive and splitting carries with Hills isn't terrible for him either not having to carry the whole load. I'm not saying i like them better then the Chiefs RB's but they can put up some good numbers 4) Matt Cassell didn't do much till the 4th Q. Heres the chiefs scoring drives 56 yard run by jamal charles, 98 yard punt return dexter mcluster, the other scoring drive they started in the red zone because of a fumble from matthews . Anyone who watched MNF should have seen that 3 plays and SD not playing well should have seen this you guys should look at KC drives before you put this bet in 5) They let San diego right back into the game SD had some great chances they brought they C game im staying away those are just 4 reasons off the top of my head when i saw this spread |
Covers | 50 |
|
|
I'm seeing Samardzija picthing which is trouble for the cubs |
Covers | 6 |
|
|
with dixon starting steelers D has to step it up more then ever, thinking up and falcons
|
Covers | 29 |
|
|
In my view the only thing Philly has on GB is a better D. I would take roger over kolb easily. I would take driver finley and jennings over jackson maclin and celek i would for sure take ryan grant running the ball over mccoy. The team just looks better on paper and please stop talking about schedules its not like green bay made their schedule they took what was given to them and put up great numbers. I don't believe you can trade away a stud starting qb for almosy nothing draft picks and all of a sudden have everything start to click for them gb - 3 love their offense |
Covers | 66 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.