Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by ryno23:
record so far: 14-7 5 plays tonight: hofstra +10 u l monroe +9 san jose st +7 tenn tech +10 idaho st + 9 gl tonight ryno
don't forget TROY+11- |
ryno23 | 6 |
|
|
Great day ryno
|
ryno23 | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ryno23:
just follow and rake the cash WITHOUT DISCLOSING TO MUCH INFO I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I FOLLOW YOU..YOU AND I ARE DOING THE SAME THING.FOR THE LAST TWO YRS...MY EMAIL IS *edited* for an answer to the above mssg.. also I have these plays by 2 am ...maybe we can help each other... |
ryno23 | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ryno23: WHAT CRITERIA ARE YOU USING TO DISQ. CLV ST.+7-????? MAKE IT A SIMPLE ANS. PLEASE
GL FOOLS...BUT NOT PART OF MY PLAYS....UNDER THE SPECS... 1ST ONE...OUTRIGHT WINNER! BOOM! LETS MAKE SOME DOUGH! |
ryno23 | 20 |
|
|
THREE MORE FL-ATL+6- TENN CHAT+10 Gg S+6- |
yeller72 | 2 |
|
|
Idaho st+12- tx s,a,+7 furman+8- IUPUI+14 CITADEL+18 austin peay+10- Tenn mart+8- |
yeller72 | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ryno23:
ADD:NC WILMINGTON + 8 GL RYNO how come you didn't play them earlier at +7 1/2 ???? |
ryno23 | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PitchBlack2011: people it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure this method out...but all the talk will undoutably bring the tout services into this thread and will screw you in the line.."loose lips sink ships"
OK...the plays I had figured out were the right plays after all...I guess the confusion was the 6, 6.5 thing... I do apologize for my tone earlier...but you have to admit the thread does get confusing at times as to what is a play and what isn't...
Obviusly others have agreed... |
KineProfessor | 1966 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SweetDickWormy:
Jimmy glad you went 5-1-1 and had a good day, but there were only 3 system plays today if you stayed true to the original system parameters. E. Mich., The Shitadel, and Potato St. Those other schools were all in conferences on the do not play list. UC Davis went to +6.5 five min, before gm. time WINNER 4-0 for the day |
ryno23 | 141 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor: Kine..I have been following this sys. for two yrs.and I made money..you are a generous individual in my opinion..why do people have to be so greedy and do the opposite of what the sys is designed for..It blows my mind to see what is happening on this forum.I don't blame you for feeling disrespected..I will continue to do what is necessary to stay the course..your a standup guy..good luck what ever you do
Hahahaha - yep, that is me selfish as can be! You wouldn't believe how many PM's and emails (and postings/comments on many other sites) that I've gotten saying what an idiot I am for posting the system online or that they would have paid a fortune to have the system all to themselves! My favorite part is that these threads have turned into 1h plays (not system), moneyline bets (not system), ALL CONFERENCES (not system), 2nd half bets (not system) AND its still literally the most simple system I've ever seen and still people need to be told what the plays and are offended that I don't want my name attached to the thread when they are using old and/or incorrect versions of the system. And then everyone completely ignores the most important part of these threads which is that everyone should use the principles of the system as a guideline in selecting which games to look at and what teams to consider and where to find the most value. "No disrespect"
|
ryno23 | 141 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Marketmaker: bet it
Ahhhhh,that's right...forgot to eliminate summit league plays
But, I show Toledo +6.5 at Ball St....am I missing something?
MM |
ryno23 | 58 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Marketmaker: toledo is -6
That's what makes this "system" so interesting...and bookies scratching their head as to why some fool would lay their hard earned cash on teams like Towson, Canisius, UC Davis, Shitadel, Alcorn St, Brown, Elon...etc. It's better not even follow the scoreboard...just wait and look for the final score to have updated!
My quick early glance shows 9 plays for Wednesday Ryno....
Toledo
Canisius
S. Dakota
Elon
E. Kentucky
UMKC
SIUE
No. Colorado
Sac. St.
MM
umkc is not a play-summit league s. dakota is not a play -summit league |
ryno23 | 58 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ryno23: that conf. is a play
11spread...this conference isnt included in the system as they rarely have lined games...but i definitely will post for all who would like to follw...becvause i will probably play it..just wont count towards the system record nice find! gl ryno |
ryno23 | 53 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ryanp26:
Bet C and D Bet C and D this year was a FOLLOW UP GAME TO ANY HOME, UNRANKED TEAM THAT WON, STRAIGHT UP, AS AN UNDERDOG. My theory was, in a sense, a contrarian theory off of Bet A and B. If I am looking at a team getting up for Bet A, and they "over-achieve" based on the line set in Vegas and win straight up as an underdog, what do they do in te next game? Well, if you follow my logic on Bet A and B, then you can probably figure out that I assumed that the next game would be a letdown game, so I FADED THE ORGINAL TEAM THAT I TOOK ON BET A IN THIER VERY NEXT GAME (BET C). I ALSO TOOK THE UNDER (BET D). I also took it a step further and included the favored team that got beat. While I understand, at first glance, a team that gets upset yet is ranked would be thought of to rebound. Not so fast... I have been a professional youth coach for 10 years now (hockey) and I can tell you from expereience that the team that just lost doesnt just pick themselves back up. A loss to an unranked team can be the perfect chemistry to a follow up letdown... So, Bet C and D were follow up bets to A and B, BUT NOT AFTER A WIN ATS, ONLY A STRAIGHT UP WIN BY THE UNDERDOG. I faded both teams in the next game and took the under. Again, I did this from Dec. 1st to Feb 1st... and I can back my stats, for 10-11, upon request. I trackd i on a free site... but you can always go do the dirty work yourself ; ). Again, this is raw data right now... the amount of bets this/these theories yielded was WAAAAY too high for me to assume this can hold water in the long run- We are talking over 450 bets in 3 months when its all said and done... but I tracked back 2 years and it was slightly profitable each year. With 450 available bets, I am really looking forward to dissecting the theory throughout the monotiny of baseball season to see if I can trim it down to 200 bets @ 60% winning percentage or better. I will not be incorporating a chase system to it. I also WILL NOT BE POSTING THIS STUFF ANYMORE... But I would love to discuss these things independently with anyone who has read my last 2 posts and would like dive into the theory with me.... filters I am considering include the basics- days rest, all streaks (winning and losing, both ATS, totals and SU, as all 3 can either effect the linemakers or the players and crowd), home and road stretches, injuries and roster activity, rivalry situations, etc etc etc.... One thing that I will be looking into that I noticed had a big effect on the mentality is coaching and the results teams are getting. For example- Izzo is having an odd year. I want to see, based on heritage and tenure of a coach, if I can categorize teams in this situation as well. Naturally, I would have to think that this will only effect the road teams in systems A and B, as you will be hard pressed to see a coach with pedigree and tenure stay out of the top 25 for too long... I mean, why the hell do you think UConn seems to never drop lower than 15????
Have fun guys- I know that this can be confusing, and I also know that it seems... well, rather simple when you think about it... but I bet systems A, B, C and D for the better part of Dec 1st through Feb 1st to track this and provide proof to the theory, whether it turned sour or sweet... for 10-11, it was sweet.... if only my $5 to $20 bets were $500 to $2000 bets!!! Hy, maybe one day!!! We can all dream, right?! I can promise, I will be thorough in my work to try and make that dream a reality... I mean, I dont know about you, but my 401k looks more like a 101b, and the pension fund is being drained like Hoffa is prez--- we all need a plan for the future!!! -Ryanp26 Ryan I am in the midst of researching "ranked and unranked" so if you would like to discuss this I am interested...I have a lot of time on my hands and college ball is one of my fav.get in touch |
Ryanp26 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor: Is there any chance of getting your horse racing preamble
Have posted since the easy Ohio State winner in the first round (no the round of 64 isn't the 2nd round - its the 1st round!) About to leave for the day, but for those of you asking what I like today, I feel that under 133 (or better) has a lot of value in the Florida Butler game today. Wish I had time to write out the angles but this is based on the short turnaround time, Butler's defense and the projected pace of play. I am expecting fewer possessions than Florida's last few games and these teams are going to have to be very efficient to get this game over. Good luck with whatever you decide, we are all in this together. I don't bet halves but there may be value in a "middle" if this game goes considerably under for the first half as well, something to keep in mind. |
KineProfessor | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MILFHUNTER74:
TED WILLIAMS? very good |
Jordan032503 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by yeller72:
badlands, 5 dimes, bet jamaica has dime lines anyone know who that is in my avatar...little trivia |
Jordan032503 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MILFHUNTER74:
p.s. the greek sucks ass I think they have 20 cent lines. someone told me jamaica has dime lines up to -150? someone confirm. badlands, 5 dimes, bet jamaica has dime lines |
Jordan032503 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by yeller72:
don't pay any attention to what the people on this site say about you ...IMHO I think you are a very intelligent and very driven in your quest for the best program that you can conceive...what I would like to know from you what is the best software out there for capping...please let me know
|
TheThinker | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheThinker:
Balance: ($790) Record: 2-4 (-$210) play for monday march 14 I don't pay any attention to what the people on this site say about you ...IMHO I think you are a very intelligent and very driven in your quest for the best program that you can conceive...what I would like to know from you what is the best software out there for capping...please let me know
Golden St +1 ($79 to win $71)
back tuesday
Falcon |
TheThinker | 38 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.