Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by loulo13: Teams putting 11 in the box deserve to lose. If we can't stop the run with 8 in the box we deserve to lose as well. You're not the playing the Washington Redskins these are the Patriots, sounds like you taking them lightly. That's a mistake. Revis and Browner are far from run stoppers but they can and will stop your receivers. I'd be worried bout that when you fall behind and need to start throwing. What passing game? I guess you have no worries with Revis/Browner Island. Question for you is.........while your double teaming Gronk who should we throw to? Edelman, LaFell, Amendola, Blount, Vereen. One of them will be open. Not to mention watch for those two tight end sets. Tim Wright might just get action in this one he's been in reserve for some time now. Don't forget who we gave up to get him. HOW WILL THE PATRIOTS RECEIVERS HANDLE THE PUNISHMENT THEY ARE GOING GET FROM CHANCELLOR AND THE LEGION OF BOOM? HOW WILL BRADY HANDLE THE SACKS AND PASS RUSH? THE RECEIVERS BEEN KNOWN TO DROP PASSES AND FUMBLE. BRADY HAS A REPUTATION FOR FUMBLES AND INTERCEPTIONS. THE PATRIOT HAVE A REPUTATION FOR CHOKING IN THE SUPERBOWL THE LAST FEW TIMES THEY GOT THERE. I WOULD LIKE TO BET ON THE PATRIOTS, WHY SHOULD I BET ON THE PATRIOTS? EVERY ONE IS ON THE PATRIOTS. WHY? WHAT DO YOU KNOW THAT I DO NOT KNOW? THE PATRIOTS CHOKING REPUTATION IN THE SB IS A BIG ISSUE.
|
Covers | 336 |
|
|
EVERYONE KNOWS THAT THE SEAHAWKS PLAY 2 DEEP WITH ZONE UNDER TO PREVENT THE BIG PLAYS, WILL THE PATRIOTS RECEIVERS BE ABLE TO HANDLE THE PUNISHMENT FROM THE LEGION OF BOOM AND NOT TURNOVER THE BALL? IS BRADY TOUGH ENOUGH TO TAKE THE PUNISHMENT AND NOT TURNOVER THE BALL? HOW WILL THE PATRIOTS HANDLE THE ENFORCER KAM CHANCELLOR? WE SHALL SEE WHAT HAPPENS IN THE SUPERBOWL.
|
Covers | 336 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by loulo13: He ran for 129......is that gonna be enough for Lynch and Seattle to win? I would never put Forsett over Lynch. My point is, if New England stops the run, Seattle's passing attack is not as strong as Baltimore's........check your stats on that. Do you understand where I'm going with this now? Seattle's main receiver is on the Jets now that's gonna hurt them in this game. Baldwin and Kearse are your deep threats........ that's a joke with Revis and Browner out there. Stack 8 in the box and focus on the run and New England should win. (Period) just my opinion. WHAT IF THE PATRIOTS CANNOT STOP LYNCH WITH 8 IN THE BOX? ARE THEY GOING TO PUT 11 IN THE BOX LIKE EVERYONE ELSE? ARE REVIS AND BROWNER RUN STOPPERS? IF THE PATRIOTS CANNOT STOP BEAST MODE WILL THAT OPEN UP THE READ OPTION WITH WILSON AND THE PASSING GAME?
|
Covers | 336 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by diggersdelite: If Seatle can't stop those east-west passes with tremendous blocking and Bellichick's crazy plays- NEW ENGLAND WILL WIN- I do believe Seattle will stop the run , however. They must make BRADY throw deep , which he seldom does! NE 24 Seattle 21 HOW DO YOU KNOW SEATTLE WILL NOT STOP THOSE EAST-WEST PASSES? THE SUPERBOWL IS FEB 1. HOW DO YOU KNOW BRADY AND THE PATRIOTS WILL NOT CHOKE LIKE THE LAST 2 SUPERBOWLS THEY PLAYED IN?
|
Covers | 336 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Carlito1: Lol...Seatle large,huh "boss"?....I bet ur 1 of the many losers that were on here last wk hollerin Seattle,DD win...LOSERS....all u suckers & "experts" tk seacocks -7 & now ur gnna try & go double against the pats?...wen it comes to trickery,& that's wat it gnna come down to,carrol takes a back seat to only 1 coach,& that's the guy wth more titles...sorry Chete carrol... I agree with you. BELACHEAT MAY BE THE BETTER COACH. SPYGATE DEFLATED FOOTBALL INELGIBLE RECEIVERS
|
Covers | 336 |
|
|
This is a very interesting game to cap because NE game plan is game specific. Last week NE game plan was to pass because BAL front 7 was big and nasty against the run. What will NE game plan be this week? This week NE game plan could be to run because they had success running the last time they played. Last week the running backs were inactive. This week the running backs will could be activated. NE game plan usually is to attack the opponents weakness and avoid their strengths. Or will NE game plan be the power passing game with Gronkowski and Edelman. WE SHALL SEE ON SUNDAY!
|
Covers | 77 |
|
|
After a couple of days of thinking about the IND/DEN game I will not use that game in capping this game because DEN was horrible. It was more BAD DEN than good IND. IND probably looked better than they really are just like ORE and ORE got dominated by OSU. A lot of people were shocked that ORE got dominated and crushed by OSU but the information was right in front of them.
On the other hand NE coming back from 14 down not once but twice was impressivel. NE is a different team. Brady is a different Brady. NE never gave up and Brady never gave up. NE and Brady were determined and came back to win the game against a nasty and physical BAL. Everyone is hyping IND after the DEN game not wanting to acknowledge how horrible DEN was in the game. DEN could not stop the IND running game and IND does not have a running game. IND D stopped DEN and IND has a BAD D. The play is NE -7 and OVER |
Covers | 77 |
|
|
This is a different Patriots team. They came back from down 14 twice. This is a different Brady. He did not give up. He kept fighting and brought the Patriots back to victory.
This is a different Colts team. They dominated the Broncos. This is a different Luck. He did not make mistakes. The 2 INT he threw were like punts and did not hurt his team. He executed the short passing game to perfection. And they stopped the Broncos on O. This is a tough game to handicap but when you have a QB Luck and the Colts ability to score TDs it is probably better to take the Colts +7 and OVER.
|
Covers | 77 |
|
|
Why are you guys arguing? We are not competing. We are just giving our opinions. We are supposed to be helping each other out. Use the information if you agree or bet the other side if you do not.
If you read my post in the Oregon v Ohio St it proved true again. I said that which ever team that ESPN was hyping they would lose. In this case ESPN said that Ohio St would not be able to stop Oregon and Ohio St would not able to keep up with Oregon and Oregon would win this game. And I said that since ESPN was hyping Oregon that the play was Ohio St and UNDER. HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF.
|
Covers | 154 |
|
|
I think the best bet is the OVER in this game. I think that IND are capable of winning this game. They said that IND was one dimensional and had no chance of beating DEN. But IND used the short passing like their running game and moved the chains. They said that IND could not stop the run. But IND stopped DEN running game made them one dimensional. I think that this game will high scoring.
|
Covers | 77 |
|
|
GB will be at a huge disadvantage with Rodgers lack of escapability. Rodgers will be lucky to last the whole game. The SEA pass rush will punish him. Rodgers will get hurt if he cannot avoid the pass rush. DAl did not get to Rodgers even when they blitzed. SEA got to him in Week ! with just their front 4 when he was healthy and this game he is not. This game could get ugly fast. I locked in bets as soon as it was posted.
|
Covers | 154 |
|
|
The problem I have with this rule is consistency. How can the ground cause an incomplettion but the ground cannot cause a fumble? If the runner falls down and loses control of the ball when it hits the ground it is not a fumble. It is basicly the same thing because he has not completed the process. It is the same principle.
|
begginerboy | 34 |
|
|
I think this game will be TD for TD and high scoring. Luck likes to throw the ball deep and can score quickly and often. 7 points seems like a lot for a team like IND that can score a lot of points. This game should go OVER and IND +7. I am concerned that DEN has struggled to score the last 2 wks. And Manning throwing ducks in cold weather is also a concern.
|
Covers | 62 |
|
|
You can look at that play 2 ways. One way of looking at it is that everything is going DAL's way this yr. Yes they are getting calls but it always happens. Last yr it was SEA. The previous yr it was BAL. This is DAL yr. They are making plays and getting calls. Deal with it. Romo is throwing passes that only his receivers can catch or are incomplete. The DAL D are making plays and getting stops. I would not bet against DAL. Especially since Rodgers is hurt and may not have the escapability. DAL +6
|
Covers | 121 |
|
|
Be careful betting SEA. I have followed SEA all season and noticed the last several wks that they are trying to save Lynch. They are trying to limit Lynch's carries and save him. Last season they sandbagged the public by just winning but not covering thru out the playoff until the SB. In the SB they did not hold back and you know what happened. SEA will not try to cover 11 as long as they get the W. The best bet is the UNDER.
|
Covers | 49 |
|
|
The Ravens are coming! The Ravens won 2 playoff games in NE and probably should have won the other. The Ravens won the SB 2 yrs ago. Ray Lewis retire last yr and Ed Reed left also so they had a down yr last yr. It took them a yr to regroup with the replacements. The Ravens woke up last wk in PIT and ready for a run for the SB. The Ravens are big and nasty and should impose their will on the PATS. The Ravens should win this game outright or at least cover. In fact the Ravens are probably the only team that can match SEA's physicality and win the SB. Flaaco is very good in the playoffs and Steve Smith is very physical.
|
Covers | 71 |
|
|
Historically every time ESPN hypes one team that teams loses. I will give you a few examples. In last year's SB they said the SEA will not be able to stop DEN and SEA will not be able to score enough points to stay with DEN. You know the outcome of the game. In the previous yr's SB they said BAL had no chance against SF and you know the outcome of that game.
This yr they are saying that OSU will not be able to stop ORE and Mariota. And ORE will stop OSU and win in a blow out. They said ORE will score TD stop OSU score TD stop OSU score TD and very quickly ORE will be up 21. History repeats itself. Look at this yr's baseball, SF won the WS on the even yrs. Believe it or not it happens. Just something to think about. If history repeats itself again OSU should be the play.
|
Covers | 99 |
|
|
I would not use the ORE/FSU game in handicapping this game because FSU was horrible and probably made ORE look better than they really are. FSU had at least seven turnovers and dropped a lot of passes. FSU gave up. ORE is probably not as good as they looked in this game. ORE D allowed 421 yds and that was in the PAC 12. Be careful.
|
Covers | 99 |
|
|
The Ohio St QB scares me. He is big strong and fast. Alabama had difficulties tackling him. Watching the game at first I thought it was poor tackling but realized the QB was strong and difficult to tackle. He will be problem for Oregon. When Coach Meyers realized that Alabama had could not tacke his QB he called more QB runs to control the game and the clock. The Ohio St will shorten the game with the running game and limit Oregon's possessions. The QB is very big athletic and fast and Oregon will have problems stopping Ohio St. Ohio St +7 and Under
|
Covers | 99 |
|
|
historically everytime everyone on tv loves one team the other teams win. everyone on tv said DEN had too much O and SEA did not have enough O but SEA won the game.
everyone on tv loves kentucky because they are bigger stronger and more athletic and they are not giving uconn a chance. kentucky is bigger stronger and more athletic than uconn like every other team that uconn has played. but uconn kill D and boatright and napier suffocating on ball pressure has been the difference in those games.
|
Covers | 24 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.