Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
minn -7 --- should be -10
wash +1 --- in the history of football DET has never won in wash GB/cinci over 50 --- GB will score some points, cinci will be able to run NYG -2 --- manning wont turn the ball over 9 times Atl +/- any --- jackson doesnt matter, better team sf -10 ---- o-line is pissed off sea -19 --- jac is terrible buff +3 --- better rookie qb
|
rlb41510 | 1 |
|
|
good stuff
|
SystemProfits | 19 |
|
|
Like the Under
Phil's have yet to use the new O RGIII hasent taken a snap in 8 months Phi/Wash-----U 52
|
rlb41510 | 1 |
|
|
Niners are a better team
I had 9ers -3 Yes I know what happened last year, new season... 9ers-beast O-line Kaep didnt have to run today, new game plan for Hawks.. or not Harbaugh knows what he is doing
|
Mr_Totals | 31 |
|
|
hahaaha, I questioned myself as a man for forgeting that Va was in the SEC, then I realize.... Im a man
|
Ducks_Homer | 20 |
|
|
9ERS!!!
|
CAPTAINPAP | 83 |
|
|
9ERS!!!!!!!!!
|
TRAIN69 | 55 |
|
|
9ERS!!!!!!!!!
|
Damon102 | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ysaelee87: No need for #s sir. Falcons are so icy like Gucci and jeezy. Atl got this. Nope
|
maya1812 | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by thehuntman: Atlanta played 2 playoff teams this year......Denver and Washington....The rest of their schedule was a joke with the likes of KC and Oakland who by the way should have won that game and it was in Atlanta SF has played GB twice and won both, Minny, Seattle twice and by the way just happened to walk into NE and won the game outright. Your stats don't mean much when the Falcons pretty much had a powder puff schedule. The 49er's are by far the most physical team that Atlanta will have faced this year and to me that is huge. GL
Amen
|
maya1812 | 14 |
|
|
GO PATS TODAY
9ERS IN 2 WEEKS!!!!!!!!!
|
chotes | 6 |
|
|
The 9ers are a lot better
|
For_The_Books | 27 |
|
|
Well done
|
AFNfootballnerd | 683 |
|
|
haha wow, good stuff LV
had game to go over 198.5 then hedged with 2H under 99 Boom hit em both!
|
LVTruck | 80 |
|
|
What r u basing this on?
|
originator | 15 |
|
|
Clemson +7!?!?!
Ah yup, book it
|
rlb41510 | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KennyCards82: Have to SERIOUSLY question the handicapping ability of anyone who liked MSU tonight. Took LSU -6, thought that was a no brainer
|
lsu-saints4ever | 129 |
|
|
When r these lines gonna get posted?
|
rlb41510 | 2 |
|
|
good call, I did the same.... just not that much
|
SharpBettor1 | 25 |
|
|
Well.......it can only go up here....right?
GL
|
TheRealMJ | 30 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.