Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
brewers only plus 125 against a team on a 8 game win streak......mets only plus 120 against gio?
seems wayyy tooo easy. thoughts? to all those squares putting the pirates in all your parlays good luck. Just remember it very unlikely they are going to win out
|
joeschmo | 1 |
|
|
mets , brewers, marlins, rays
|
dawgballz | 20 |
|
|
nats and pads r looking very trappy arent they? any reason why someone wouldnt take those 2 teams at those lines if playing the game?
|
Deep | 11 |
|
|
is there any reason why anyone would possibly take any of these 3 teams at these values? cant think of any........therefore i am taking all 3, all 4 lookin rly trappy.....
pitt on a 8 game streak and the terrible brews r only plus 125 with an avg pitcher? padres r way better than marlins and marlins won yesterday, padres to get back on track is basically pick em and gio against the terrible mets is only -135.............hmmmmmmmmmm im not falling in the trap , ru?????????????????????
|
joeschmo | 1 |
|
|
sry i had a few typos in there, im in a hrry this morn, speed typing lol
|
Rana828 | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: -200 is not worse than -210? I have him -135 to win whole thing from couple days ago but off board now--but if he gets by Tsonga he should win whole thing easier. Tsonga tooughest opponent left for him in my opinion. Maybe that is why it is like it is? -210 is worse than -200 think about it why u risk 210 to win 100 that he wins whole trny, when you could just risk 200 to win 100 that he wins his next mach. the only LOGICAL explanation for this is that its an error or you got ur line mixed u or wrong........ it has nothing to do with who tsnoga or murray has or hasnt beat lol, its just common sense and basic match that theres an error goin on , and if this is confusing to anyone they def shud not be betting, as not understanding basic math is a huge disadvantage in the beeting world
|
Rana828 | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BigRick3199:
If you do, make sure you are with a book that doesn't grade a retirement.
or one that grades full completed matches either lol |
Christian_iaco | 15 |
|
|
I hope you didn't do this lol
|
Christian_iaco | 15 |
|
|
replied to
Is it scientifically possible that the Earth actually does revolve around me? Cuz i cant lose!
in College Basketball
i got u at 6-8 bud, way to pick everything on the board to , u r a loooooooooooser, get lost with ur stoooooooopid threat title , ur bs abt juice, and ur bs picks
|
Roboduck | 44 |
|
|
replied to
Is it scientifically possible that the Earth actually does revolve around me? Cuz i cant lose!
in College Basketball I actually like most of ur picks tonight, has nothing to do with the fact that several quotes you've already made have been proven "full of shi." it would be like if I said west Virginia beat kst last night (today), I would be full of shi.....because they didn't beat them, even if I luckily went 20 for 20 on tonights picks it still wouldn't have anything to do with my previous comments being full of shi.
furthermore you haven't even attempted to explain in a way that makes sense your contradicting statements about what you risk and what you win, except for telling us to re-read your statements that were exact opposites lol
get lost punkkkkkkkkkkkk |
Roboduck | 44 |
|
|
replied to
Is it scientifically possible that the Earth actually does revolve around me? Cuz i cant lose!
in College Basketball Quote Originally Posted by Roboduck:
Ya, with my bookie you win what you bet but if you push or lose then its 10%. so a $1000 bet would win you a grand but a loss would be -$1100 and a push would be -$100
this is actually what you said, than later you changed it to bet a grand to win a grand, no matter how many times you ask me to re-read it the words you typed earlier aren't changing , you have explained it opposite ways multiple times.......just admit you are full of s... on this, which most likely means you are full of s... on everything ur sayn |
Roboduck | 44 |
|
|
replied to
Is it scientifically possible that the Earth actually does revolve around me? Cuz i cant lose!
in College Basketball actually u don't get it, in your reply to me earlier you said that you bet 1000 to win 1000, yet in ur first post you said you bet 1100 to win 1000, it clearly sounds like you have no clue what you are talkn abt at all, and if you don't even kno wat ur betting or wat ur winning and winning and losing, I have a hard time believing your other statements about being on a huge win streak. the majority of bettors lose, yet you expect us to believe you win consistently win twice a week when your playn with a book that significantly handicaps you, lol ahahahahahah don't even give this clown anymore attention, its just way to easy to see he's full of s...
however I do kinda like both his plays tonight, but that's just my opinion, im definitely not suggesting that just cause I like him that there correct |
Roboduck | 44 |
|
|
replied to
Is it scientifically possible that the Earth actually does revolve around me? Cuz i cant lose!
in College Basketball Quote Originally Posted by Roboduck:
It actually works out better if you win more than you lose
it doesn't workout better in any way shape or form, every other site you bet 1100 to win 1000, and push on a tie, actually yours seems like its only slightly worse but if you did the math would realize its significantly worse than everyone elses, unless im missing something, u said you win what you bet on a win, isn't that how everyones site is? and if you lose you lose 10% juice plus the bet amount yet they are charging you 10% on a tie ? |
Roboduck | 44 |
|
|
r u guys watchn the game??? he also has a 56yard td catch, that's pretty impressive , he is hands down the mvp if game ended run now
|
AFNfootballnerd | 16 |
|
|
if niners win this game, the guy that turned power off fer sure wins mvp right?
|
joeschmo | 1 |
|
|
this guy gives good info, but than his ultimate picks sucks and are 100% biased no matter what he tells you, I do hate when people rip on peoples picks and have never done so, and ive lso never tailed this guy so im not biased.
but lets look at the facts hes only 13-13 on a team he has all this great info on, he's missed atleast his last 3. The Miami game the pub was all over Maryland and so was he and now tonight the pub is all over nc st , yet he takes Maryland anyways. just proof hes picking with biases and nothing else.
that being said my pick of the day (not guna say yr and than have 75 picks of the yr like everyone else) is Maryland tonight.
but only cus I always play against huuuge pub pix |
accventures | 82 |
|
|
you people can say what you want, there is no real good reason to take pitt or think they could win, there coming off a home loss to cincy who just lost back to back at home themselves.
that being said I doooooooo , (unlike some) believe in traps, and therefore I will b on pitt read my last post on bama kast night if you want extra confidence |
D_Unit | 12 |
|
|
lol bro, good call
|
joeschmo | 4 |
|
|
the other thing they have in common is neither one of them will win the title this yr
and the other thing they have in common is they both played Stanford at home, 1 lost , the other got help from a bad call to win |
Ducks_Homer | 7 |
|
|
Its one thing to claim notre dame just finds ways to win, but that's not true, not like they blocked a fg or made a big sack to knock em outta fg range, the kid just choked 37yarder. Notre Dame put there undefeated season on the foot of a 35 yard fg by pitt and got real luckyyyyy, don't kid yourself they didn't create some magical potion to win that game. Sure its just 1 game but they were at home, they also beat usc who without barkley shut got rolled by a 500 GTECH team. They beat Stanford also at home on a lucky (probably incorrect) call. They barely got by a bad purdue at home that got throttled an average ok st. They barely got by byu. There one good win was at olahoma by 17, but if you watched game it was tied 13-13 late in game and than they pulled away real late. An ou team that just lost by 30 in a bowl game. Sure they went undefeated as they don't have a conf title game. Just look at ohio st , very similar situation, went undefeated against a sketch schedule almost lost home games to bad teams, like purdue and Michigan, barely beat mich st on road, actually very similar to notre dame. And yet no one would give ohio st a legit shot tonight against bama.
Remember how bama made Michigan look like a high school team on a neutral field. While notre dame got 6 turnovers at home against Michigan and still cudnt put them away.
Notre Dame could cover tonight, they've had a month to prepare, its a game of inches, a game of turnover margin etc. But don't kid yourself Bama is way better , they should win by 3 scores, and 99 times out of 99 they win outright, 99 times out of 100 they cover the 10. |
joeschmo | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.