Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wentz will be the man with the best chance of succeeding Fisher is thinking of how much he reminds him of McNair with Gurly playing Eddie George.
They were in a tough spot with expectations what they are and the Titans bent them over. I think they gave up too much from a risk reward standpoint but Kroenke put the management team in a tough spot and this was a panic move. I think Lynch could have very well been available at 15 and I believe he is comparable Snead and Fisher felt otherwise. The problem is if this blows up they will be out by the end of the year and all of us Rams fans will be suffering for many more. Far too reminiscent of their fleecing of the Redskins for my liking. Goff only if ownership is making the decision. More tickets more jerseys via the CAL connection.
|
ClubDirt | 23 |
|
|||
My best bets for the day. PIT CHI UNDER 5.5 STL TB SJ OVER 5.5 It might be worth a small wager on the regulation tie in the PIT CHI game, likely close to 4 to 1 on your money. Enjoy the games. |
Covers | 9 |
|
|||
People, people , people... Just watch the line...Public has more confidence in the Lucky colts yet the line goes from -7 to as much as -9. DEN -8.5 |
Covers | 62 |
|
|||
WIN and over 5 This is my Dog of the day and definitely not suggesting others jump on it...(I don't know squat!!) Ducks have been a little iffy of late Jets much better on the road Opening ceremonies tend to affect the home team as a distraction rather than motivation. My only caution (other than Joe Pecsi being all over the Ducks) is the OT finish in LA last night...will it motivate the Jets or leave them tired and flat. GL all |
Covers | 11 |
|
|||
CHI and over 5 Hawks amped and ready to get the taste of that oilers loss out of their mouths. Wild coming into an arena where they can't win with minimal motivation and a case of the flu going around the team. Not to mention the info provided by Joe. I might even -1.5 this one...but if I did the Wild would probably win. |
Covers | 8 |
|
|||
CAR for value...But I think the blue chip bet is the Under.
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|||
"the Bruins have won eight in a row against the Hurricanes - including their last four trips to Raleigh, N.C." This statement was made in the covers preview (bottom of matchup page) just below the summary of the last 10 head to head games where the statement was proved completely untrue. Anyway I think Carolina has good value here (Bruins 1-5 in afternoon games) would really like to know if Skinner is playing though... CAR Under 5.5
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|||
OSU +9 Got it before it dropped to +7.5. I hate Meyer but this late line move spoke to me...it said "The line has dropped to 7.5 and your book still shows 9...it's worth betting on a team and coach you hate"... So I did. |
Covers | 64 |
|
|||
This does seem like a perfect spot to take Baylor (home game, bad match up for ST), seems the public thinks so too...and that line isn't moving. Will Baylor come in with the same mindset as TCU?? I hope so. Baylor -2.5 over 69 |
Covers | 23 |
|
|||
Caps under 5.5 Van over 5 Happy New Year all!! |
Covers | 5 |
|
|||
BTW...thank you for changing the line column back to L/W, so much easier to read. It's nice to know that you take the concerns of your members seriously. Thanks again. |
akinginrags | 11 |
|
|||
Looks good so far, thank you Rizzo.
|
akinginrags | 11 |
|
|||
Agreed Andarmac. More errors today...
|
akinginrags | 11 |
|
|||
The errors are in the ats win loss column in the "Last 10 games" section: NYK lose ats -2.5 @ ATL they actually won as at +2.5
|
akinginrags | 11 |
|
|||
I love the new look for the matchup page but have noticed some critical errors that could cost bettors money. In the "last 10 games" area the fav and dog for some games is incorrect...ex on Dallas' list yesterday they were listed as losing ats the first 2 games in OKC as the fav when the actually won ats as the dog. |
akinginrags | 11 |
|
|||
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
why is this thread in the NBA section, and not the covers help section? I do see your point though...I will post this in help as well. |
akinginrags | 7 |
|
|||
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
why is this thread in the NBA section, and not the covers help section? Because I thought anyone using these #'s to bet might want to know they are incorrect...how foolish of me. |
akinginrags | 7 |
|
|||
Sorry this should have been the lead comment. I love the new look for the matchup page but have noticed some critical errors that could cost bettors money. In the "last 10 games" area the fav and dog for some games is incorrect...ex on Dallas' list yesterday they were listed as losing ats the first 2 games in OKC as the fav when the actually won ats as the dog. |
akinginrags | 7 |
|
|||
All sorts of errors on matchup page in "last ten games" |
akinginrags | 7 |
|
|||
The message I get each time I try accessing the scoreboards pasted below: Oops! Internet Explorer could not connect to scores.covers.com Try reloading: scores.covers.com/basketball-scores-matchups.aspx Additional suggestions:
|
akinginrags | 9 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.