Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Why do you get so many views on here? You lose basically every play you make on a daily basis. Retarded milkman is more like it. How bout you go re-pay the people you ripped off at sbr instead of posting this garbage.
|
CrazyMilkMan | 26 |
|
|
Hey crazymilkman, you have a lot of point loans you stiffed people out of over at sbr. You better start winning so you can pay them off. Quit being a degenerate and go pay off your debt.
|
CrazyMilkMan | 37 |
|
|
Are there any that accept US players? and are not through a third party site where you have to verify your info through phone calls and/or a photo of your license or something like that? I am not too serious about poker, just would be nice to find a site with a free $10 - $20 sign up no deposit bonus code to mess around with on nickel tables. I looked through a bunch of google search results and could not find any that met that criteria.
|
abracadaver | 3 |
|
|
Anyone know anywhere where I can look up what place each horse came in in it's last three races?
|
abracadaver | 1 |
|
|
What is the point of this thread? You just stole a few chase systems that were already covered in in this forum and are reposting the individual plays like they are your own? I guess hoping some sucker will click on the paypal donation thing on your blog and give you money?
|
sport_investor | 100 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tallguyindc:
Read this post very carefully. There are at least 3 different ways that he puts his finger on the scale. #1. Using "at risk" and "to win" interchangeably. Here are the exact posts from pregame: Redskins-250 ML / 7.5units
ATL-190 ML / 9.5units He posted them the exact same day in the exact same format. One could reasonably expect that postgame, he would at least pick the better of "at risk" or "to win" and claim that he bet both games the same way. That still wouldn't be subtle, but it would be a lot subtler than this. He expects us to read this as the Falcons were "to win" and the Redskins are "at risk". By this point, there should be no doubt in anybody's mind at all what would have happened if the Redskins won and the Falcons lost. 2. On the superteasers, where exactly did he bet 12 units to win 10.8. That works out to -111 odds, yet the only place that I'm aware of that is offering this bet is offering it at -140 odds. He did this repeatedly through baseball season. He was occasionally called on it, but for the most part, his followers let him slide. If you can just change the lines to something that nobody is offering in the real world, you are going to be profitable. 3. You went 8-2 on the day. Really?!?!?! There has been a lot of attention paid to units and some of the bullshit accounting practices that he has tried to use in order to juice his units. In response, his followers always say something along the lines of "All this attention to units is besides the point, his overall record is so great...it doesn't matter which MM you use". Well, look closely at his 8-2 record. It looks to me an awful lot like a 2-2 record. You don't get to add up teaser component wins as individual wins. If you pick all 4 teams in a teaser, that counts as 1 win. If you go 3-1 in a teaser, that counts as 0 wins and 1 loss. I know I promised a long and detailed post on the teaser strategy today. Thats going to have to wait at least another day or two. I'd like to see these issues addressed first. Let me just give a hint. If you picked teams randomly and gave an extra 13 points to the line, you would end up with an 84% success rate. If you counted each teaser component win as an individual win, any fool could easily end up with an absurdly good record. I haven't gone over his baseball "proven record" point by point but I have no doubt that his finger would show up on the scale in many many places. These are just 3 in one post. I know there are others. |
sports_Network | 641 |
|
|
You are right, it is my own fault for mindlessly following his picks a few times and adjusting my units according to his assuming his impressive stats were honest.
But it is really lame how him and his following are making me out to be this lunatic. I never said his picks are bad. The guy has built a good following with solid picks. I just think it is really low how when he has a horrible week, he lies about his units wagered to make himself come out good. That is like me building a good following with great picks over time, posting a large unit play indicating it is a very strong play knowing people will follow and place large real money wagers on it, and then after it loses saying just kidding guys, I only wagered a couple bucks on it so i am still plus-whatever on the year. Lame. Whatever, this is my last post in here, it is obviously useless. All you clowns are oblivious to what a fraud he is. Seriously though, someone explain to me how the unit number next to his ML wagers last week when he was perfect was "units won" when he posted his final results, yet means "units risked" this week after he loses a large unit play. |
sports_Network | 641 |
|
|
Yeah, I am the immature one. You are the one coming up with all these fake unit's won trying to impress a bunch of strangers on the internet. toot toot.
|
sports_Network | 641 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kreatture: Dude.. seriously..? You seriously have some major issues. So.. if you ask SN a question - he doesn't respond to it and he's a fraud. But.. if SN answers a question - the haters claim not to understnad the answer and he's still a fraud.. If someone can not understand what the above highlighted sentence is, then I actually feel bad for them. What the hell are they doing in a Sports Wagering forum?!?! How embarrassing.. I feel bad for your life if you have to walk around all day with a head like that on your shoulders. You've earned my pity vote.. Why do so many people keep sticking up for this guy? I would like to know how the unit number he places next to his ML wagers miraculously changes from week to week between "units to win" to "units risked" after they are over depending on whatever result makes him look better. You know? Maybe some people on here follow his picks because his units won look so impressive. When you lose a bunch of REAL money following him and then he has the nerve to claim he made a profit that week because suddenly that unit number was units risked even though it was completely different the week before, it is pretty frustrating and deceptive. |
sports_Network | 641 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network: I truly understand your comprehension level is extremely immature, and argumentive, your approach is dis-respectful. Read the following post, and stop embarrasing yourself. of course I lost 7.5units, do you think I need you to tell me? now go up stairs lil' fella, the basement is getting damp, mommy has your cookies and, 'her' milk; haha. See? This guy did exactly what I said he would do. He posts just a unit number next to his moneyline wagers. If he wins he counts that unit number as "units to win" like last week, if he loses he counts that unit number as "units risked" like this week. "Redskins-250 ML / 7 1/2 units would equate out to 3units connected to a win". Um, that is just a general in between answer to that question, it definitely doesn't imply that is what you personally meant by it. If Washington won, I guarantee you be claiming 7.5 units of profit from that wager. What a fraud. |
sports_Network | 641 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network: are you retarded? or a troll seeking attention. that is absolutely the stupidest post I have ever read. Actually, would you please continue, tell everyone some more, run in down, your the man, (or child) please explain Matchup_Performance, what do you think of ATL/CHI ? what are your plays for today? EXCUSE me, I CAN SEE YOUR BUSY with your 8 post in two years. all pertaining to your ignorance, and thirst for attention. good-bye You are the one who goes out of your way to avoid any question asked about units when you just post a general unit number with no "to win" or "risk" attached to it. I don't get why you just cant give a straight answer, it was a simple question. So, according to how your past wagers have gone, you just lost close to 19 units on Washington. Just putting that out there before you try to say you only lost 7.5. |
sports_Network | 641 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network: Redskins-250 ML / 7 1/2 units would equate out to 3units connected to a win.. best regards
SN Nice answer. Now if you win you can claim to win 7.5 units, and if you lose say you only lost 7.5 units. |
sports_Network | 641 |
|
|
Thanks bud! You are making me rich. Fade the Escape system is like gold.
||win.gif' border=0>
|
ESCAPE_ | 12 |
|
|
ESCAPE_ | 27 |
|
||
Keep the crappy picks coming. I make a killing fading you every time you post.
|
ESCAPE_ | 27 |
|
|
I am a little confused on what is good and bad concerning line movement.
For example...Say team A opens as a -5 point favorite. 80% of the public is on team A but the line moves to -4. So does this line movement favor team B and put up a red flag if you were interested in team A? or neither? example 2...team A opens as a 10 point favorite. 85% of the public is on team A and the line moves to 11.5. If I am interested in team A, does this line movement mean it is a good wager at the current line? or the other way around? or neither? |
abracadaver | 3 |
|
|
You have it all wrong. ESCAPE was put on waivers.
|
juscvrbby | 13 |
|
|
||an_beatup.gif' border=0>
You cant have any money left. Isn't that a few grand you have lost now in the last few days?
www.suicidehotlines.com
|
ESCAPE_ | 17 |
|
|
0-5. That takes skill.
||an_beatup.gif' border=0>
|
ESCAPE_ | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.