Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan: Preseason 5-2 Regular Season 20 -14 Big Wussie Plays 5-1 ### Big Wussie Play### Tennessee +7(-115) Too many points for this divisional matchup. I'll ride with the team with the better qb and stable of running backs. This is a field goal game either way and it wouldn't surprise me to see Mariota pull out the upset... Back later with more... As always... (corn) Nice line Wuss. Line down to 5 now (Watt injury). GL
|
WussieMan | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by phixer: overall defense means exactly that - points allowed I agree. Points are bottom line. Just pointing that poster in the right direction so he didn't misunderstand you. Cheers!
|
phixer | 404 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: what statistic are we talking for green bay #1 defense? its not overall ypg I believe he is refering to points allowed per game, to which he is correct. Cheers!
|
phixer | 404 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bear_Down74: Don't know where you got that stat but its incorrect Maybe you're assuming ATS. They are 7-2 SU and 6-0 SU last 6 off the bye week. Go check their schedule dating back to 2005. Cheers!
|
phixer | 1164 |
|
|
Been a while since I've posted in one of your threads LC. Sorry about the slump. I know that you're solid though so keep your head up (not that you need the encouragement). I'm sure you'll pull through... think Law of Averages. BOL the rest of the season. I still remember the past seasons where you beasted NFL (divisional home dogs, elite teams dogging pretenders, etc..). Cheers!
|
LeagueCapper | 88 |
|
|
See it as Pitt -4.
This is one of those lines where I look at it and ask, "WTF?!?! Am I missing something here?".
|
porkdinner56 | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raider63: So tonight you have an interesting MNF situation. NYG off of a BYE week and Colts off a rare loss where they were victimized by Rothlesburger. Big Ben can look slow and lunky and be a sitting duck that gets his aa..kicked but certainly does look like he is benefiting in new offense. Prior to playing the Eagles Eli looked like he was doing well in more conservative shorter throw offense. The Giants have issues at Running back with injuries. They have not been great off bye weeks in years past. They are at home and it is Monday night and they are getting points is the best case for them. Conversely Colts off beatdown from Pitt last week have been money following a loss. Defense couldnt stop Pitt last week and correct me if I am wrong Giants Offense similar to Pitt. Minus Roth a power back a fast back and the leading receiver in the NFL Power ranking #s have Giants at 99.5 plus 3 for 102.5 and the Colts at 104.7 for a 2.2 difference. So the line seems to be right but the amount of money on Colts is very high. I am guessing right at some point New York Money will come in late and it seems like that is always on New York teams. I loved the Colts all week long. Those picks were wrong side in Balt Den and Sea...So dont listen to me ....Only the Phixer man has the answers to these questions. No offense, but the Giants have been pretty good off the bye. They are 7-2 since 2005 with Manning and have won the last 6. That being said I still have no side for this game myself (I don't rely on stats like that to decide). BOL on whichever side you are on tonight. Cheers!
|
phixer | 1164 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ByrdMane612: 4. Andrew luck vs Eli manning Must I need to say more! We know who has the edge. Luck after a SU IS 11-1 manning after a bye is horrible. Both teams play on turf so qb is use to it. Luck has more offense power than Manning and has been in this offense since his days at Stanford with pep Hamilton n Eli is still struggling with this new offense ranking near the bottom of plays that goes more then 20 yards pg. luck> manning 5. This last one is fir you and one reason why you like giants\colts whoever tonight! by no means I am a capper like the sharps in here but anyone in here can have solid into that can help us get money tonight. Thanks and Bol No offense but Manning off bye is 7-2 since 2005 and 6-0 last 6. No side on this game for me but good luck with your play. Cheers!
|
ByrdMane612 | 21 |
|
|
Week 2
Balt 26 Pitt 6 total closed @ 44.5 Cheers!
|
Raidernator76 | 13 |
|
|
Hou ATS 44%
Pitt ATS 56% Hou ML 58% Pitt ML 42% vegas insiders (site) current numbers
|
talesfromdcrypt | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by chaloots: Can I bet with you? Raiders shouldn't be -6 against Bama I'm basing this off various linesmaker ratings. On a neutral field it seems that's where the numbers are. I may be wrong. And if I was a book I'd be glad to take on your action. Cheers
|
sidehustle | 16 |
|
|
I have Raiders -6.
|
sidehustle | 16 |
|
|
Great job Europa! Nice catch on that live one!
|
Europa | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat: Ho BOY!!! just made every Blackhawks fan and bettor poop their pants Hehe wow LeRinkRat you're just on fire today with your calls! Cheers!!
|
smp | 30 |
|
|
Suspended. Official. Grats to those who needed it. Sorry for those who didn't.
|
BayArea342 | 32 |
|
|
Coors Field . I like it. GL
|
SportsLab | 43 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VegasBorn: Sportslab, I believe you are on the money with this one. It just seems strange to me that the total is only 7.5 when both teams as of late have been hitting well. It screams over but with both clubs having studs on the mound I may join you on that play. GL Congrats SL. This one was a no brainer. Knew one of these clubs was due for a regression. Took a shot at it being the angels and cashed on the +175 as well. Cheers
|
SportsLab | 68 |
|
|
Congrats foolish. Nice value play we hit. Kicking myself for not hitting it at +195 when I first saw it. Cheers
|
FoolishGame | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Do not doubt Keuchel or Richards, both have been excellent lately. I would like an under except that both offenses are explosive and a meltdown by either guy spells over. This game is, imho, untouchable. The odds may say "take a flyer on Keuchel" but it would have to be considered a value play, not an outright odds-on pick. I will probably watch it since my pick will be done by game time, but more to get another look at Keuchel and Richards than anything else. Couldn't agree with you more. I'm taking a shot on the Stros purely for value. Their offense has been clicking as of late and I figure why the hell not . You are one of the few who I've seen also questioning that total. I understand both pitchers on the mound have been great as of late, esp. Richards but both offenses have been just as. Gun to my head, I'd be on the under. Still sitting on that play though. GL tonight
|
KeyElement | 30 |
|
|
Sportslab, I believe you are on the money with this one. It just seems strange to me that the total is only 7.5 when both teams as of late have been hitting well. It screams over but with both clubs having studs on the mound I may join you on that play. GL
|
SportsLab | 68 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.