Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
yes too easy, On Sports book spy, Cinci is getting 95% of the bets but the line is dropping from -13.5 to -11.. Vegas just loves giving money away... Smells fishy, staying away from this one..
|
Covers | 5 |
|
|
Line still dropping to -8.5
|
Covers | 13 |
|
|
57% of the bets are on UCF and the line has dropped from -10 to -9... So smart money has to be coming in on Memphis.. 1) Sandwich game for UCF coming off home loss (after leading at the half) to a big SEC team in So Carolina.. Now on the road against Memphis with Louisville up next.. 2) Memphis has covered last two as a Dog winning one out right.. Other was on the road as a 8pt dog, losing by 2 3) Memphis is playing better D so a Home Dog with an improved D is a remedy to make money. GL to all, Pro |
Covers | 13 |
|
|
ptz, you don't know what your talking about, "The teams have not changed that much except GB's special teams" Adding Marshall and Jeffiies to the Off, Tice is now the OC. Last years draft choice from Boise is back from injury.. You like facts, get some... |
Covers | 89 |
|
|
Throw out history, as for da Bears record with Culter against the Fudge-packers was with OC Ron Tuner (no imagination) and Mike Martz (Nut, and would not let Cutler autible). New Offensive weapons. da Bears realize that they can put a strong hold on the Division with a win tonight.. Bears 23 F-packers 17 |
Covers | 89 |
|
|
Here another interesting stat: Winless teams (>4 games) off a bye, as an UD >6pts are 17 & 0 ATS. Can GB cover this? Yes, but coming off Atlanta on Sunday night, with Viking up next, they play only as well as they need to get the W. Lambs of the bye +14 GL |
Covers | 40 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by AceMackenzie]
Bucs dont travel well at all , SF has improved a lot , they are being choached much better, Although the Bucs are my home team , Im afraid that SF has the advantage. SF -3 The Bucs don't travel well? They have won 10 of 11 SU! Late game so travel should not be an impact. Alex Smith probably plays better on the road because the home crowd - if things do start out well, he will press. This is a field-goal game, so I'm buying the hook and taking the bucs +3.5.. GL |
Covers | 26 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by topperchris]
Agree..Scares me... Agree also, CAM is so Popular so the Public is all over Carolina and Vegas is giving away the hook? Glad to see the QB change, Jags M/L GL |
Covers | 33 |
|
|
I like to move to Rees, ND -3 to win and cover...
|
Covers | 28 |
|
|
Are you one of the Ref's from the Ravens game?
Quote Originally Posted by lineguru:
THE JETS WILL HAVE A LAYOVER IN THE "BURGH" AFTER EXPERIENCING ENGINE FAILURE....SANCHEESE CRUMBLES//// AND THE RUNNING GAME? STEEL CURTAIN AND A CRAZY TROY,SHOULD SOLVE ANY DOUBTS. PITTSBURGH BY 17 OR MORE!! |
Covers | 177 |
|
|
what you are doing, is exactly what Vegas is banking on... My option. GL Quote Originally Posted by kerussein:
I'm going to tease both favs and go with Pitt and GB +2.5...an odd strategy I know but I just don't see the Jets and Chi winning outright and when I bet on FG spreads I'd like to think they have that chance. Besides I'd much rather watch a GB/Pitt Superbowl and New England cost me plenty of last weekend... |
Covers | 177 |
|
|
OK, going to keep this simple, If the Jets can beat Manning and Brady, I have to say anything is possible. Will the Steelers win? They could. Will the Jets win? Would not shock... Bears fan here (really?) Taking both dogs on a ML parlay. Bears/Jets ML: 2.6:1 da Bears and Jets in the Super Bowl. Why not? GLTA, if I lose, I lose... Pro |
Covers | 177 |
|
|
wow, you're a Viking fan - Well at least you have Frazier and Singletary now...
Quote Originally Posted by dbol6683:
loss at chicago by 3 (Gould kick fgs with 4 secs left) loss at washington by 3 (OT Loss) loss vs. miami by 3 (OT Loss) loss at atlanta by 3 (ATL kick FG with 9 secs left) loss at detroit by 4 (rodgers left game in 1st half) loss at Pats by 4 (rodgers out) **If your betting on the "6" losses its gonna be a long day for you. Im a Vikes fan and dont care for either team but i follow division very close. Only advantage i see Bears having is that shitty field. I got pack -3
|
Covers | 201 |
|
|
The "Fix" is in... WASHINGTON -- It's not a presidential proclamation, but it is a prediction. |
Covers | 201 |
|
|
808, 1) Niether was Atlanta - Both teams beat Philly 2) Regular season - In GB, who cares, 3 to 3 thru 4 QTRs 3) Stark? Please, Rookie that surprised Philly and 16th ranked D. Bears will have an answer for him with two weeks of film. 4) Again, Atlanta was over-hype from soft-schedule. NO beat them at home and lost to Seahawks... 5) Your right Rodgers is on fire - 3 point thru 3.5 quarters at home against da Bears in "must-win" 6) No, they are not - Bears are at 100% 7) Turf is dirt... 8) Packers 3 and 5 on the road regular season.. 9) 80 yards is all you need with short fields.. 10) 4 Head coaches on this - advantage da Bears 11) You are correct, weather will not be a factor.
Quote Originally Posted by 808pickyboy:
Wow Vue! Its someone else this year. This guy has no clue and sure enough, I doubt that he'll be on this thread. SUSPENDED!!! I see it coming. I've been there. HA HA HA!
Vue, my braddah. Do yourself a favor and get off that Bears wagon for this game. Few reasons:
1) Seattle is no measuring stick for Bears performance. My 4 year old picked the bears in that game cause he knows Seattle sucks. I don't hate them at all but they are Seattle F@#$kin Seahawks man!
2) Bears got sacked I think 3 times in that game and 5 -6 against the Packers. They definitely tried to get the Packers out of the Play Offs so they would not be in this predicament.
3) The Bears defense now have to take into account Starks performance as of late.
4) Atlanta had a great Defense at home and look what happened to them. Most of all, Falcons did not score 21 points in the last quarter because their defense does not give up from start to finish.
5) Rogers Is On Fire. This team right now reminds me of the Saints last year in the playoffs but Brees did not play as well as Rodgers and the defense is twice as good.
6) GB is healthier.
7) Soldier field might as well be Home Field cause I don't think any other teams other than the bears play on this field more than the Packers. Isn't GB fans in driving distance from soldier field so I think that there will be a lot of GB backers there as well.
8) GB has performed much more consistent all year than the Bears. We know that Bears can shit the bed any time.
9) Forte has been held to under 80 yards by the Pack i majority of there meetings
10) GB has the better QB, Coach, and supporting staff on both sides of the ball.
11)Weather will not be a factor for GB because they have been practicing outdoors.
etc..etc..etc..etc
VUE MY BRADDAH. GL 2 U! |
Covers | 201 |
|
|
808, good post, but to your point, the Falcons were no "measuring stick" either - very over-hyped as they played every team in the NFC-West, Carolina twice and CLEVE and CINCI, so who cares about their record - one and done in play-offs. And they had the 16th D in all of the NFL, so no surprise that Rodgers looked like Montana last week. Yes, agree, weather will not effect Green Bay because they play in it also, but it will limit him to what they had last week in a dome, especially the "turf" of Soldier Field - It will slow down a team that is built on speed... These two teams know each all too well, I will hold Rodgers to <90 QB rating and win the game. GL
Quote Originally Posted by 808pickyboy:
Wow Vue! Its someone else this year. This guy has no clue and sure enough, I doubt that he'll be on this thread. SUSPENDED!!! I see it coming. I've been there. HA HA HA!
Vue, my braddah. Do yourself a favor and get off that Bears wagon for this game. Few reasons:
1) Seattle is no measuring stick for Bears performance. My 4 year old picked the bears in that game cause he knows Seattle sucks. I don't hate them at all but they are Seattle F@#$kin Seahawks man!
2) Bears got sacked I think 3 times in that game and 5 -6 against the Packers. They definitely tried to get the Packers out of the Play Offs so they would not be in this predicament.
3) The Bears defense now have to take into account Starks performance as of late.
4) Atlanta had a great Defense at home and look what happened to them. Most of all, Falcons did not score 21 points in the last quarter because their defense does not give up from start to finish.
5) Rogers Is On Fire. This team right now reminds me of the Saints last year in the playoffs but Brees did not play as well as Rodgers and the defense is twice as good.
6) GB is healthier.
7) Soldier field might as well be Home Field cause I don't think any other teams other than the bears play on this field more than the Packers. Isn't GB fans in driving distance from soldier field so I think that there will be a lot of GB backers there as well.
8) GB has performed much more consistent all year than the Bears. We know that Bears can shit the bed any time.
9) Forte has been held to under 80 yards by the Pack i majority of there meetings
10) GB has the better QB, Coach, and supporting staff on both sides of the ball.
11)Weather will not be a factor for GB because they have been practicing outdoors.
etc..etc..etc..etc
VUE MY BRADDAH. GL 2 U! |
Covers | 201 |
|
|
I like the way that you're rolling here, but I think Cutler early and Forte and Taylor mixed in. This is actually more of a Super Bowl to da Bears then the Super Bowl. da Bears have 4 head coaches on their sidelines - and all 4 have experience against the Pack (Viks and Lions) da Bears will be ready. So bring on the Seahawks, bring on the Packers, this here win is for all da Bears Backers, uh huh... Quote Originally Posted by rock40237:
Packers stock cant be any higher particularly Rodgers , with that being said I'm going with the Bears to feed Forte and Taylor play keep away for 3 quarters, then let Cutler win it late. 21-14 Bears. Win this one for Papa Bear! |
Covers | 201 |
|
|
Lovie is not calling the D. Bears will use wild-cat and niether team will run much, so even. and don't say Sparks, because a 6th round rookie will not run on da Bears... we got 2 weeks of video, no surprises. Game 1: early, warm weather, soft field, learning Martz Game 2: Was a "must win" for Pack, play-book close to vest? Please.. Bears: two weeks of film to watch, packers only one - Play book is open, big advantage Bears. Bears 30 Offense, Hester/Manning, Special teams, Field position, Robbie Gould, Ghost Papa Bear... Offense is not an issue. Bears year.. Good Luck Quote Originally Posted by Waz44:
Packers Game Plan- Stop the Run first make Cutler beat you. Cutler must be dining w/Martz as both look heavier now than in mid -season Lovie clinging to the past - Capers innovative and contemporary. Game 1 - Penalties were Packers 18 Bears 5 Game 2 - Pack seemed to play close to vest w/playbook Bears at home better than Eagles while inferior to Atlanta. Pack opens up playbook - Cutler turns the ball over and Self destructs and Martz(old school) has no answer. Bears # 30 Offense can't keep up - Packers by 11 |
Covers | 201 |
|
|
Rodgers best QB: Again against over-rated Atlanta D. Rodgers hstortically against da Bears ~ so-so. Quote Originally Posted by Fazool:
Gotta go GB here. There has been no better QB in the playoffs than Rodgers, i just don't think CHI will have an answer for him. Also the GB run D has been lights out in the playoffs, just can't see Cutler carrying this team. Should be a good either way; GL all! |
Covers | 201 |
|
|
Big Daddy - Pack over Falcons was an easy call - Atlanta play every team form the NFC-West and also Carl, Cleve, and Cinci and still had the 16th ranke D in the league... I have had GB on the ML in both of their games - but it stops here - why? GB Offense is all about "timing" and "speed" - two things that they will lose because of the field conditions of Solider Field. GB's timing will be off - da Bears D will pressure Rodgers much more then Philly and Atlanta - Don't fall into the ESPN hipe... Remember, the pack in final against da Bears at home in must win situation - it was 3 to 3 in the 4th quarter - This game is in Chicago and da Bears have been getting no respect all week, they love that... Big Daddy. da Bears 23, Pack 16. Just my option: 2 dog Money Line Parlay da Bears/Jets. Good Luck Friend, Pro...
Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddyhpd:
The Bears are better balanced on offense but I'm leaning on the packers...I went against them against the Falcons and the Pack shocked me |
Covers | 201 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.