Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrazyMilkMan is really good to follow
|
thaknuts | 15 |
|
|
Never put faith in Joe Flacco.....
|
Saigone | 5 |
|
|
Cowherd changed his Colts pick to Baltimore on Thursday so he is on Baltimore now BOL
|
858Kurt | 11 |
|
|
Cowherd is on Cincy and GB today
|
PlayinPlot | 3 |
|
|
McGeevwas actually listed as a backup going into the bowl my apologies.....good news is is that Saunders is playing. He is more important
|
clsmooth | 3 |
|
|
Saunders (WR) is playing and McGee (starting DT) is suspended
|
clsmooth | 3 |
|
|
|
TRAIN69 | 65 |
|
|
True occy......Auburn if i were you i would look at the Knicks personally. |
ET4AUBURN1982 | 10 |
|
|
Personally, it's tough for me to lay points on the road but the clippers are hot and have won three straight by DD. They already killed the Bulls earlier this year by 21 too. Chris Paul, Jordan, and Griffin all rested the entire 4th quarter on Sunday too and Butler only played like 90 seconds in the 4th. With Rose and Rip out, i just see CP3 taking advantage. Whatever you do.....BOL!
|
ET4AUBURN1982 | 10 |
|
|
you're ridiculous lol this trade DID NOT happen. Stop.
|
Xelorvegas | 26 |
|
|
There is no substance behind this rumor right now. Ignore it people.
|
Xelorvegas | 26 |
|
|
If you guys have not read the article on the home page.....you'll see that this is not the right line for this game.
|
JForstrom05 | 9 |
|
|
my apologies my apologies.....i meant barbosa NOT bradley is there and i just went on a rant about Bradley. Too many B's. I got caught up! thats what happens when you see a line you love. BARBOSA is in Boston and he will provide another scoring option off the bench at guard. CHALMERS is a defensive liability on the Heats end and hasn't proven he can stop anyone yet. Take it as you may. It doesn't take away from the fact that this is still HUGE line for an opening night for the champions!
|
JForstrom05 | 9 |
|
|
Boston +7 Avery Bradley and Jeff Green are back! Avery Bradley was a very key defender that helped the Celtics get as far as they did. Jeff Green is another long body who can physically matchup with Bron and give Paul Pierce a break. In the very few games Bradley played in the playoffs last year the he was second in +/- at 18 only to KG who was an absurd +56 at the time. |
JForstrom05 | 9 |
|
|
i feel better about playin Indiana -2.5 |
gabrielpo12 | 9 |
|
|
Michigan is a dangerous pick.......look what Sparty did to Denard last year and Sparty returns almost all of that defense. Take the points in that game.
|
Teaser78 | 5 |
|
|
I didn't claim it was mine I just copied and pasted for everyone to see man. You don't see me with a lot of posts nor do I claim to be a capper. If you don't want me to post this stuff for everyone then so be it. |
JForstrom05 | 9 |
|
|
Without getting too technical I'd lean CLE/TOR Under and I see more value in taking Memphis +8 than the over/under. |
JForstrom05 | 9 |
|
|
There are a lot of reasons to like this game. But perhaps the best is that this game is really the start of the postseason. A playoff berth isn't on the line, per se, but the winner of this game is going to have taken a big step toward locking up that No. 8 slot. If Phoenix wins they will be tied with Denver with seven games to play and have an edge because of the tiebreaker. If Denver wins they will have a two-game lead with seven to play and a lot of momentum. The playoffs mean defense in the NBA. That is why the postseason is more low-scoring and I don't feel that this total reflects what the true tenor of this game is going to be. Sure, there is the potential for 230 points and for this one to go down in flames. But I don't think that will be the case here. The next reason I really like this situation is that the general public has been slow to react to the reality of these two teams. These aren't the same fly-by-the-seat-of-their-pants Suns and Nuggets teams that we saw from 2008-2010. The top end offensive talent is gone and it has been replaced by a bunch of workers. Look at Phoenix's starting lineup for crying out loud: Shannon Brown, Jared Dudley and Marcin Gortat are among the guys getting the most minutes. Denver - which will be without its No. 2 and No. 5 scorers - is being led by Ty Lawson, Arron Afflalo and Andre Miller. Huh? These teams do have balance. But they don't have the scoring punch we have come to expect. Phoenix is coming off two of their highest offensive outputs in the past month, scoring 107 and 109 against Utah and Sacramento. They have only topped 105 points seven times in their last 30 games, so to do it in back-to-back games is a bit of an aberration. The last time they went off like that in back-to-back games they came out and scored 91 points on the road against the Clippers. Before that they had a run where they scored 104 in three straight games before they went out and scored just 81 aginst the Clips. They are just 8-12 against the total over their last 20 games and just 8-17 aginast the total in their last 25 road games. Denver is moving the same way. They are just 6-13 against the total in their last 19 as a favorite and the 'under' is 7-3 in the last 10 meetings between these two teams. Denver is back after a long road trip, and while they will get a boost from the home crowd I don't know that it's enough to get them into the 120 range, especially without Gallinari and Chandler. The Nuggets haven't cracked 100 points but one time in their last four games and have only topped 105 points just six times in their last 28 non-OT games. The public is chewing this number up, betting the 'over' at nearly a 70 percent rate. But this total is out of whack with what these teams have done lately and all season long. I think that we'll see 204 points in this game. It will be close enough to give us a scare but in the end we should take the cash! |
JForstrom05 | 9 |
|
|
I'll go along with a small play on the Red Sox with those lineups
|
troylex300 | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.