Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
The guy is making minimum NBA wage and you want to trade him?
Not to mention the fact he's an absolute cash cow right now. I can't argue your point about player value if someone was willing to wildly overpay. But from a business standpoint...and it is a business beyond everything else...even considering trading Lin would be Linsane. |
chuckdaduck | 53 |
|
|
Toss or throw, Rondo is gone for a deuce.
|
HowardLangston | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kerryjop: Yea i understand. But to me, it feels like most woman always prefer a guy who is older than them. If the guy is younger, many feel like its their younger brother etc. I mean, i can't imagine a really hot attractive girl who could be a model throw themselves to one of these high school recruits you know what i mean? The only women i can imagine are those who just want to fit in.... such as those woman who look okay and become pornstars. But i'm saying imagine your average hot college chick who likes to go out and party a lot and has high standards. Very rarely can the univeristy get someone like that to do it right and look for girls who have lower standard? Are you kidding? You don't know much about women, pal. Especially when it comes to hangin' out with a potential BMOC. |
kerryjop | 53 |
|
|
If anyone wants to know whether or not Floyd wins, consider that he is allowed to bet whatever he wants for as much as he wants at any book in Las Vegas.
That speaks volumes about how his opinion is regarded by the books. |
iCapper | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by cocky24: maryland will keep it close against a banged up UVA team Who's hurt for Virginia? If you have info, please share. |
DixHandley | 4 |
|
|
Virginia -10
Boise -5.5 Troy +2.5 (last game ever in their old house) Cal -9.5 E Mich +8.5 Campbell -1 (NW State is actually closed for the Mardi Gras, why did they get a home game here?) Idaho State +8.5 I've been horseshit all week, but have a good feeling about this card....I hope! |
DixHandley | 4 |
|
|
Thanks again for the info on the Valpo big dude. I have no problem blowing a little vig...and I almost got lucky and middled the sucker!
|
DixHandley | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DaGmen: Honestly, I feel betting more now would ruin the stats. I have been betting 100 each and have built up 57 units. If i start betting 500-1000 one bad day could ruin all the units... so pretty much i am trying to stay consistent. Today Michigan st ML and Stanford ML would of been my best plays. Wasn't suggesting at all that you go hog wild. Simply an incremental boost since you're playing with their money. 150 rather than 100 would be the most I would bump it. Certainly not 500-1000! But if you're comfortable where you are, then that's probably the place to be, right? |
DaGmen | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Damu4Life: yea strange time of year for a non conf game Bracketbuster. Not strange at all. |
DixHandley | 13 |
|
|
I've been at this for a long time, and have never seen a season where short numbered public chalk has won like this.
Just using Covers consensus to illustrate...I'm showing 30 games so far this college season where 70% or better have been on one side of a game where the number is -3 or less. This is normally fade city. This season, with the Arizona win and cover tonight, those small public favorite are now 21-9 ATS. And that's amazing. |
DixHandley | 1 |
|
|
Sounds legit. He played Tuesday but he's listed doubtful, so something is sure up.
|
DixHandley | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DixHandley: Just a heads up that Valpo's big guy is not playing. Otherwise, I'd have been on Crusaders pretty big (actually, I was till I got the info and am not buying back the other side for most of my bet). Now buying, as opposed to not buying. |
JFen31 | 40 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JFen31: Friday: Valpo +6 @ Loyola Marymount (1 unit) Just a heads up that Valpo's big guy is not playing. Otherwise, I'd have been on Crusaders pretty big (actually, I was till I got the info and am not buying back the other side for most of my bet). |
JFen31 | 40 |
|
|
Shit. Oh well, the bet is in, I'll just hope for the best. But that is absolutely not good news as it sounds like Valpo isn't treating this with a great sense of urgency.
I can lay back 5.5 and blow the vig, so that's what I'll do. Hey, maybe it falls 6 and I get lucky. Thanks for the heads up. |
DixHandley | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CappinSkillz: dude anyone can bet ml's..lets be real Congrats on one of the dumbest comments of all time. Sure, anyone can bet money line chalk. Doesn't mean they bet the right ones. This guy clearly has been based that big bottom line profit. +57 units net is huge. Therefore, your comment is moronic. Only question I have is why the dollar amount per unit hasn't been raised. Up that much, time to go for the jugular. |
DaGmen | 49 |
|
|
Taking the points with Valpo. Got 6.5.
Sure hope that Van Wijk is playing. He dinged up a knee and missed the Youngstown game but played 22 minutes against UIC, so I'll keep my fingers crossed. If he's good to go, I see Valpo winning this one outright...but I'd rather play it safer and grab the points. |
DixHandley | 13 |
|
|
Adding The Citadel +10. I know they're terrible, but Western Carolina laying doubles? Seems a bit much, looks like pretty solid value.
|
DixHandley | 5 |
|
|
Good stuff.
I'm actually surprised you're giving Ole Miss "credit" for a good win against Miss State. I guess so, but that Bulldog team can lose to almost anyone with their complete laziness on defense. |
sloop703 | 60 |
|
|
Hope it's a smoother ride than the SEMO train. Sure thought I would win that one.
|
DixHandley | 5 |
|
|
FAU -1.5
Troy +6.5 |
DixHandley | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.