Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rustie; Whether you post or not in this thread, you've given me another tool to use. Thanks. |
rustie | 94 |
|
|
Thanks, guys. |
rustie | 94 |
|
|
@rustie Rustie, how did you break the tie between Pittsburgh and St Louis? Both are at 76%. Great system, by the way. |
rustie | 94 |
|
|
Dan: Apologies if you've explained this previously, but looked through the first 20 pages or so and couldn't find the answer. What triggers an increase in the unit increase? Is it a percentage of one bank, a percentage of the total between both banks, etc.? Thanks for sharing and all the work that goes into making these posts for us. |
Danrules24 | 4274 |
|
|
BCap; If I understand the system correctly, wouldn't Det +8 @ Ind also be a play? Ind was a dog in their last game by 5.5 and they covered. Thanks for the work on this. It looks promising. |
BCap888 | 28 |
|
|
Johnny; Great stuff. Have you thought about a filter to exclude games, for example, with a low total like 6.5 or 7? My experience (and I can't backtest this) has been giving up 1.5 runs on the RL when the total is low makes it a little harder to cover. Today's Dodger game is an example. The total is 6, so this game might be filtered out. |
jonnymega | 20 |
|
|
Of course I meant, "...if Milwaukee wins by 1,...."
|
cisco | 142 |
|
|
Cisco & AllDay; Mil is @ the Mets tonight, and it's Game 2 for Mil and Game 1 for the Mets. I know the spreadsheet shows pushing the Mets out a game to bet on Mil tonight, but have you given any thought to betting both? We're taking the Mets +1.5 on the RL. If we took Mil on the ML for the Mets chase, we would guarantee hitting 1 chase AND if the Mets win by 1, we clear both. I know it sounds a little goofy, but have you thought about this? |
cisco | 142 |
|
|
correction: on Wednesday.
|
Alldaygambler28 | 113 |
|
|
Better check the Houston page in the spreadsheet, AD. You have them as a home dog winner, but they were a home FAVORITE winner on Thursday.
|
Alldaygambler28 | 113 |
|
|
Sorry, Neilsy, but you lost me again on a couple of today's plays. SF - they've gone LLLWL. Why are you playing them to win? And why to win 2 units? Isn't this the first play on them this year? I'm still confused over the Col series. Det - they've gone WWWWL. I understand playing them to win, but why for 2 units? So you treat the Det labby line as if you lost the TB game even though you didn't play the game?
|
neilsy25 | 81 |
|
|
Thanks. I think I follow, but it'll probably make more sense to me as the season goes forward. It helps having you list the plays so I can compare them to what I think they should be.
|
neilsy25 | 81 |
|
|
Neilsy; How do you decide who to play when you have a conflict? For example, Det is on a 3 game win streak and TB is on a 3 game win streak and they play each other today. You should play both to win. How do you handle this? |
neilsy25 | 81 |
|
|
Cisco, I like the addition of the +1.5 RL. Good luck to all.
|
cisco | 142 |
|
|
Thanks for the work, Smitler.
|
smitler | 2552 |
|
|
Careful on the Texas play, Cisco. The Angels winning % is .625.
|
cisco | 138 |
|
|
How long do you wait before you calculate which teams are below a .470 winning percentage? |
cisco | 138 |
|
|
Great start, Cisco. I didn't know you ran this for Spring Training games.
|
cisco | 138 |
|
|
Well said, PB. Give my regards to Little Ricky, and good luck to you both.
|
Polar_Bear | 66 |
|
|
roll = $7,294.90 8-17 NBA: Mia/Den u 203' -110 $711.70 to win $647 NHL: SJ -1' +115 $647 to win $744.05 Bookmaker lines. Good luck. |
kreatture | 404 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.