Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
What a stupid fucking bitch!! And of course those scrubbing motherfuckers from UAB will miss every free throw they shoot in the second half but one and it kills me.
|
Mike C. | 44 |
|
|
aaaa1... Touts? There is no touting, as a matter of fact there is a link at the bottom of this wagerline page for their web site.
But, atleast it is clear that I can copy everybody ele's information and post it all over this place and act like it's mine and that's fine, but don't dare try to give credit to the original author?? Sounds kind of messed up, however with that being said, if Japo wants to pay the $25 per pick and post it on here for free....... keep up the good "analysis" Japo!
|
japo76 | 25 |
|
|
Looks like 2 losers! But it's not your fault, I would blame edited, I got his picks too.
Your pick will be graded at: 186 BoDog
EXPERT: edited
TITLE: NBA 3-Point Play Package
REASON FOR PICK: 3* Under 186 Boston at New York
Monday – 1:00 pm EST
The last meeting between these two teams boasted one of the ugliest offensive performances in NBA history. The Knicks, hounded by Boston’s league-best defense, shot just 30.3 percent en route to scoring just 59 points. It’s a stretch to think New York will shoot that bad again but it won’t shoot that much better. The Celtics still own the league’s top defense and good defense like theirs often lead to ugly performances from undisciplined offenses like New York’s.
Boston leads the NBA in almost every major defensive statistic. It is first in points allowed with just 87.3 allowed per game, first in defense shooting percentage at 41.5 percent and first in defensive three-point percentage at 30.8 percent. The Celtics routinely shut down quality offenses. New York’s will have no chance. The Knicks are 24th in the NBA with just 94.5 points per game and 25th with a 43.8 team shooting percentage.
Three of the last four meetings between these teams have stayed under the total with those three games averaging just 176 points per game. Expect more of the same in this meeting. New York has averaged just 94 points per game in its last four home games while Boston has allowed just 82.3 points per game in its last three road contests. This game easily stays under the total.
Your pick will be graded at: -3.5 5Dimes
EXPERT: edited
TITLE: NBA 3-Point Play Package
REASON FOR PICK: 3* Dallas (-3.5) over Washington
Monday – 1:00 pm EST
The Wizards have surprised everyone by staying afloat despite an injury to Gilbert Arenas that has sidelined the star for a majority of the season. Most of Washington’s success has come against the much weaker Eastern Conference, though, as it has struggled against the West. The Wizards are just 6-6 against the West this year with most of the wins coming against the bottom of the conference against teams like Seattle and Minnesota. Those six losses have come 13 points per game.
Dallas, meanwhile, will be playing with a chip on its shoulder as it looks to exact some revenge on Washington. The Mavs lost at home to the Wiz earlier this year, shooting an uncharacteristically low 39.3 percent while allowing Washington to shoot an uncharacteristically high 50.7 percent. There’s no way that happens again. Dallas is 8-1 SU over its last nine games, winning those games by 14.4 points per game with six of those wins coming by double digits.
The key to Dallas’ recent success has been a return to the defensive intensity that led the team to a league-high in wins last year. The Mavs have allowed just 87 points per game over their last eight wins and that defense will come in handy against the Wizards.
The Mavs are a veteran team that doesn’t take kindly to losing, especially on their home court. They’ll return to the favor to Washington this afternoon. Take Dallas on the road minus the points.
|
japo76 | 25 |
|
|
gl Graphic, I would take an 8 point Purdue win, I 've seen the line drop fom an open of -10 to as recently low as -7.5.... Hopefull you have the lower number if you like Purdue.
|
japo76 | 14 |
|
|
As we’ve stated many times before, picking bowl games is a lot about who wants to be there vs. who doesn’t want to be there. That theory applies perfectly to this game. The Boilers were looking for MUCH bigger things this season. They started the year 5-0 and there was talk of winning the Big Ten and a possible January 1st bowl. Since that 5-0 start, Purdue has gone 2-5 barely squeaking into the final bowl spot for the Big Ten, the Motor City Bowl. This team is not at all excited about playing in the lowest bowl slot in the league when they were looking for a sunny, warm location to be making their post-season appearance.
CMU was headed in the opposite direction to close out the season. After losing three of their first four games (including one @ Purdue and we’ll get to that in a minute), the Chippewas have won 7 of their last 9 games. This is an experienced team that won the MAC Championship two straight years and is thrilled to be here. They wanted another shot at Purdue and now they get it. This time the game is on a neutral field rather than in West Lafayette. Take that back, it’s in Detroit which will make it more of a “home” game for CMU. They have been talking about redemption ever since being paired with Purdue for this game.
The Boilers beat CMU 45-22 back on September 15th. As we stated earlier, the Chippewas were not playing well at that point in the season. They got down 31-0 at halftime and had trouble mustering any offense. At halftime, they made some adjustments and outscored Purdue 22-14 and put up 239 yards passing in the second half. Purdue, on the other hand, had only 65 total yards of offense in half number two.
As the season went along, Central Michigan became very balanced on offense. They ended the season averaging 265 yards passing and 182 yards on the ground. QB Dan LeFevour had his second straight outstanding season throwing for over 3300 yards and 23 TDs. This team should make hay vs. a Purdue defense that was shredded by good teams. They allowed 436 yards per game and 32 PPG vs. teams going to bowl games. They were 1-5 vs. those teams with their only win coming vs. this CMU squad. In fact, that was Purdue’s only win this over a team with a .500 or better record.
Purdue isn’t thrilled being here in the first place and now they must play a team they already beat this season. No chance they come out fired up for this game. CMU on the other hand will play this as if they are in the National Championship game. This stays very close with the Chippewas pulling the upset.
|
japo76 | 14 |
|
|
Not trying to bash either, but the reason Japo posts his picks seperately, is because all of the picks are copied and pasted from coversexperts.com. I have no problem with him doing this, because I use those guys from time to time and all of Japo's posts are exactly word for word.
I know I will have some of you "regulars" get mad about me posting that, but who cares, I appreciate reading the free picks that he is PAYING for.
|
japo76 | 14 |
|
|
Us, pirate backers, can think Freddy 'fucking' Sanchez for this loss... turn the double play in the 6th and we have a real shot of pulling this game out, instead he can't catch the fucking ball and 5 runs later this game is out of reach! Even worse is that I had those losers at +1.5... Rule #1: don't bet on losers. And, trust me, the Pirates are the biggest losers in the mlb. Hope everyone can find a game to get their money back this evening.
|
PBurgh | 32 |
|
|
That touchdown marks the 3rd stright night in a row I lost big fucking money on the final play of the game ... Blue Jays -1.5 on Tuesday (Burnett gives up solo home run in 9th with 2 outs and win 4-3), Under 7 SD/PIT last night (3-2 in bottom of the 9th, 2 outs and SD hits a fucking 3-run homer to win 5-3, and the under 46 tonight in that bullshit Miami/A&M game.... what the fuck? My bookie is the luckiest motherfucker alive!!! I had 3g on each of those plays!!! ||an_brick.gif' border=0>||an_brick.gif' border=0>||an_brick.gif' border=0>||an_brick.gif' border=0>||an_brick.gif' border=0>
|
AznRedNeck | 31 |
|
|
Anybody have a clue if this game is going to be played or not??
|
williamz817 | 24 |
|
|
Guys.... consider this a testimonial. I am not a very good capper, it seems like I am always ending up on the wrong side of every play and every break falls against me when gambling. Knowing all of this and the fact that i love to bet on sports I gave these "experts" a shot for several months now. I used David Malinsky, Scott Rickenbach, Lee Kostroski, Matt Fargo... I probably tried out most of them, becuase I felt this must be what they do for a living, I thought that they knew all the angles and if there were non-public info. pertaining to these games then they would surely know it so that we would have a bit of an edge over joe Public. Here's the lesson I learned over the past few months: NEVER pay for a pick. I know most of you would never resort to this, but honestly we all looking for some guru to come on here and tell us who to take and win us lots of money. But bottom line, these "experts" absolutely killed me and my bankroll with their "Game of the Month" and "6* plays". I have lost over $25k in the past 3 weeks playing a majority of their plays. I really just want people that use them to take them with a grain of salt, sure their analysis can be informative at times, but they are honestly not any better than most of the guys and gals on this site ( and no one on this site is really all that great either). Anyway, not looking for feedback, just wanted to share info. to those of you that pay $25 for a good guess. Don't do it, you will actually feel better about a loss if you are the one who chose the game. I wish I would have.
|
BankRoll | 33 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.