It’s been less than two weeks since the islamic terrorist attack in
San Bernardino and new information regarding the 7th century barbarians
who carried out that attack continues to roll in. What we are learning
about the two islamists is alarming, but there is more, much more, to it
than the revelations coming to light about Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook, but before
we get into that let’s take stock in what information has been
uncovered so far.
Malik, the female islamic barbarian, came to the United States from
Saudi Arabia just a year ago on a K1 visa, more commonly known as the
‘fiancée visa,’ and according to government sources it is one of the
hardest visas to obtain as the vetting process for it is reportedly the
most vigorous.
We also now know that Malik was 'radicalized' prior to her ever coming
to our country and that her 'radicalization' more than likely took place
in Islamabad, Pakistan, years ago. Malik was, according to documents,
one of a number that comprises only 0.3% of all visas handed out in
2014. Early reports stated that Farook, the male half of the islamic
terrorist connection, was 'radicalized' by Malik but that has now been
replaced by reports indicating that Farook began the process of being
'radicalized' long before he ever met Malik. Farook, in fact, was
'radicalized' right here at home.
We also know that Malik, as per islamic ideology, was not employed and
that Farook had an income of $51,000 per year meaning the some $30,000
plus worth of guns, ammo, and IED supplies, seemed way out of line with
his income, fueling speculation that the couple had some outside source
of funding. And it now appears that they maxed-out their credit lines,
including the taking out of a $28,500 loan from the on-line lender,
'Prosper', who issued this statement, "All loans originated through the
Prosper platform are subject to all identity verification and screening
procedures required by law, including U.S. anti-terrorism and anti-money
laundering laws. Like all Americans, Prosper is shocked and saddened by
recent events in San Bernardino."
And we have learned that Farook and Malik had been planning their
islamic terrorist attack for nearly a year and that Farook had
apparently planned an earlier attack back in 2012...at least a full year
before he ever met Malik but was 'spooked' by a sweep of islamic
terrorist suspects by law enforcement in Southern California back then
and scrapped his plan at that time. There have now been two witnesses who have come forward to say they saw
both Malik and Farook at a Riverside, California, gun range, practicing
their aim and shooting at paper targets for the past year and even in
the days before their terrorist attack on December 2nd. And we know that
the two islamists purchased thousands of rounds of ammunition and
enough supplies to build dozens of IED devices, and that the two
handguns used in the attack were purchased legally. We also know that a friend,
Enrique Marquez, who is currently in the process of converting to islam,
purchased two rifles that he either gave or sold to the islamic
terrorist couple.
Investigators are now looking at Malik’s past and suspect that she had
been an islamic terror operative for years. Investigators are also now
looking at her family’s ties to terrorism including her possible
contacts with al-Qaeda's Syrian arm, al-Nusra, and her possible
connection to the known radical 'Red Mosque' in Pakistan. And let’s not
forget that during the attack, Malik posted to Facebook that she had
pledged her allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Here’s something else we know...a report that was quickly removed from
the headlines...that being the fact that San Bernardino law enforcement
officials knew, within five minutes of the islamic terrorist attack,
exactly who was responsible. Yes, they were tipped off by survivors of
the attack, but according to reports, Farook was a person of interest to
local law enforcement before the attack and that San Bernardino police
had been wanting to talk to Farook.
As if all of this isn’t bad enough...now it gets downright chilling.
According to Farook’s father...Syed Farook...his son was a supporter of
ISIS and believed that Israel should be wiped from the map. And
according to CV Claverie, a friend of Nicholas Thalasinos, a coworker of
Farook’s who was shot and killed by Farook and Malik in the attack,
Farook had told Thalasinos that, “Islam will rule the world,” and that
Farook had, for some time, been threatening Thalasinos...telling him
that, “Christians and person deserve to die; and that he (Nicholas) was
going to die.”
Perhaps the reason San Bernardino police wanted to talk to Farook, in
the days before the attack, had something to do with these threats
against his coworker, and maybe, just maybe, the reason police hesitated
was because in a world where the cops are labeled as bigots of one sort
or another, and in a world where political correctness is more
important than the rule of law, having contact with a muslim regarding
potential terrorist threats is seen as prejudiced.
It’s been less than two weeks since the islamic terrorist attack in
San Bernardino and new information regarding the 7th century barbarians
who carried out that attack continues to roll in. What we are learning
about the two islamists is alarming, but there is more, much more, to it
than the revelations coming to light about Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook, but before
we get into that let’s take stock in what information has been
uncovered so far.
Malik, the female islamic barbarian, came to the United States from
Saudi Arabia just a year ago on a K1 visa, more commonly known as the
‘fiancée visa,’ and according to government sources it is one of the
hardest visas to obtain as the vetting process for it is reportedly the
most vigorous.
We also now know that Malik was 'radicalized' prior to her ever coming
to our country and that her 'radicalization' more than likely took place
in Islamabad, Pakistan, years ago. Malik was, according to documents,
one of a number that comprises only 0.3% of all visas handed out in
2014. Early reports stated that Farook, the male half of the islamic
terrorist connection, was 'radicalized' by Malik but that has now been
replaced by reports indicating that Farook began the process of being
'radicalized' long before he ever met Malik. Farook, in fact, was
'radicalized' right here at home.
We also know that Malik, as per islamic ideology, was not employed and
that Farook had an income of $51,000 per year meaning the some $30,000
plus worth of guns, ammo, and IED supplies, seemed way out of line with
his income, fueling speculation that the couple had some outside source
of funding. And it now appears that they maxed-out their credit lines,
including the taking out of a $28,500 loan from the on-line lender,
'Prosper', who issued this statement, "All loans originated through the
Prosper platform are subject to all identity verification and screening
procedures required by law, including U.S. anti-terrorism and anti-money
laundering laws. Like all Americans, Prosper is shocked and saddened by
recent events in San Bernardino."
And we have learned that Farook and Malik had been planning their
islamic terrorist attack for nearly a year and that Farook had
apparently planned an earlier attack back in 2012...at least a full year
before he ever met Malik but was 'spooked' by a sweep of islamic
terrorist suspects by law enforcement in Southern California back then
and scrapped his plan at that time. There have now been two witnesses who have come forward to say they saw
both Malik and Farook at a Riverside, California, gun range, practicing
their aim and shooting at paper targets for the past year and even in
the days before their terrorist attack on December 2nd. And we know that
the two islamists purchased thousands of rounds of ammunition and
enough supplies to build dozens of IED devices, and that the two
handguns used in the attack were purchased legally. We also know that a friend,
Enrique Marquez, who is currently in the process of converting to islam,
purchased two rifles that he either gave or sold to the islamic
terrorist couple.
Investigators are now looking at Malik’s past and suspect that she had
been an islamic terror operative for years. Investigators are also now
looking at her family’s ties to terrorism including her possible
contacts with al-Qaeda's Syrian arm, al-Nusra, and her possible
connection to the known radical 'Red Mosque' in Pakistan. And let’s not
forget that during the attack, Malik posted to Facebook that she had
pledged her allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Here’s something else we know...a report that was quickly removed from
the headlines...that being the fact that San Bernardino law enforcement
officials knew, within five minutes of the islamic terrorist attack,
exactly who was responsible. Yes, they were tipped off by survivors of
the attack, but according to reports, Farook was a person of interest to
local law enforcement before the attack and that San Bernardino police
had been wanting to talk to Farook.
As if all of this isn’t bad enough...now it gets downright chilling.
According to Farook’s father...Syed Farook...his son was a supporter of
ISIS and believed that Israel should be wiped from the map. And
according to CV Claverie, a friend of Nicholas Thalasinos, a coworker of
Farook’s who was shot and killed by Farook and Malik in the attack,
Farook had told Thalasinos that, “Islam will rule the world,” and that
Farook had, for some time, been threatening Thalasinos...telling him
that, “Christians and person deserve to die; and that he (Nicholas) was
going to die.”
Perhaps the reason San Bernardino police wanted to talk to Farook, in
the days before the attack, had something to do with these threats
against his coworker, and maybe, just maybe, the reason police hesitated
was because in a world where the cops are labeled as bigots of one sort
or another, and in a world where political correctness is more
important than the rule of law, having contact with a muslim regarding
potential terrorist threats is seen as prejudiced.
In Part 1of our Investigative Report: 'Obama's Deal With the Devil' (https://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/201...),
we presented why we believe Obama gave the speech he did and why the
San Bernardino police are acting after the fact in a way they should
have acted before the fact. But what is...is...and we are left not with
questions per se, but with facts that we can no longer afford to
overlook...and those facts center around Barack HUSSEIN Obama himself
and where his true loyalties lie.
To put the pieces of the puzzle together we need just look at Obama's
actions, policies, and words since he became president. Let's
start with his Cairo, Egypt, speech soon after he assumed the office of
the presidency. In that speech Obama aligned himself with the muslims by
saying his job as president of the United States was to "fight against
negative stereotypes of islam wherever they appear." However, that is not
the job of an American president...his job is to 'protect the health,
safety, and welfare' of the American people above all else, as it is his
job to show America in a positive light where and whenever possible. An
American president does not defame or dishonor his country, its
military, or its people...which Obama routinely does...nor does an
American president bow to any foreign leader... especially to a leader
whose allegiances are still somewhat in question. And in this case we
mean Obama's bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia in whose country islam's (supposed) holy city of Mecca lies.
Also, an American president does not during a time of war announce to
the enemy when he is pulling out of said theater of war for that gives
the enemy time to lay low, regroup, and reemerge stronger than ever
after our troops have left. And this is exactly what Obama allowed when
announcing our date of withdrawal from the Afghan and Iraqi theaters of
war...and thousands of innocents who would not have died did so because
of his actions.
And in doing what he did allowed ISIS to be born for in ISIS' birth
Obama...good little islamist that he is...saw what he thought would be a
way to unite Sunni muslims against the secular government of Syrian
Shi'ite President Bashar al-Assad. And embedded within those he helped
to unite were known radical islamists who saw this union as their way to
form different terrorist groups each with their own terrorist
agenda...groups who morphed into the likes of Jabhad al-Nusra and into
the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria...ISIS if you will...amongst
others...yet all working together to create just the right mix for
unifying the islamists living in not only Sunni dominated Iraq and
Syria, but with the hope of drawing into the whole the entirety of the
Sunnis in the Arab world...drawing them into their jihadist army...an
army united in the qur'an dictated mission of killing us all.
And how does Obama fit into this beyond his allowing for ISIS'
birth...what is critical to his involvement is to know exactly who this
man is. First, Obama is what's known in some muslim circles as a
'cultural muslim'...a muslim who might not outwardly practice the faith
but a muslim whose sympathies and actions against Israel, and
specifically its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, shows his loyalties
lie with those in the islamic world who see themselves locked in a
self-perceived life and death battle against the Jewish State.
And while
it can be rightly assumed that Obama is no Christian as he has never
attended a Christian church service since becoming president but has
made sure to celebrate Ramadan with members of his staff and
Congress...and along with his vile words against Christianity at this
year's National Prayer Breakfast there exists no record of his
converting. Remember, Obama's being a muslim can be proven by not only
his Indonesian school records listing his faith as 'islam' for if he was
not a muslim he could not have attended the madrasa school he did attend, but
also by his many slips when being interviewed where for example he
said, “my muslim faith.” And if somewhere there is a record of his
converting that would mean that under islamic law he would be a 'murtadd'
(apostate), an ex-muslim converted to another religion who must be
executed.
In Part 1of our Investigative Report: 'Obama's Deal With the Devil' (https://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/201...),
we presented why we believe Obama gave the speech he did and why the
San Bernardino police are acting after the fact in a way they should
have acted before the fact. But what is...is...and we are left not with
questions per se, but with facts that we can no longer afford to
overlook...and those facts center around Barack HUSSEIN Obama himself
and where his true loyalties lie.
To put the pieces of the puzzle together we need just look at Obama's
actions, policies, and words since he became president. Let's
start with his Cairo, Egypt, speech soon after he assumed the office of
the presidency. In that speech Obama aligned himself with the muslims by
saying his job as president of the United States was to "fight against
negative stereotypes of islam wherever they appear." However, that is not
the job of an American president...his job is to 'protect the health,
safety, and welfare' of the American people above all else, as it is his
job to show America in a positive light where and whenever possible. An
American president does not defame or dishonor his country, its
military, or its people...which Obama routinely does...nor does an
American president bow to any foreign leader... especially to a leader
whose allegiances are still somewhat in question. And in this case we
mean Obama's bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia in whose country islam's (supposed) holy city of Mecca lies.
Also, an American president does not during a time of war announce to
the enemy when he is pulling out of said theater of war for that gives
the enemy time to lay low, regroup, and reemerge stronger than ever
after our troops have left. And this is exactly what Obama allowed when
announcing our date of withdrawal from the Afghan and Iraqi theaters of
war...and thousands of innocents who would not have died did so because
of his actions.
And in doing what he did allowed ISIS to be born for in ISIS' birth
Obama...good little islamist that he is...saw what he thought would be a
way to unite Sunni muslims against the secular government of Syrian
Shi'ite President Bashar al-Assad. And embedded within those he helped
to unite were known radical islamists who saw this union as their way to
form different terrorist groups each with their own terrorist
agenda...groups who morphed into the likes of Jabhad al-Nusra and into
the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria...ISIS if you will...amongst
others...yet all working together to create just the right mix for
unifying the islamists living in not only Sunni dominated Iraq and
Syria, but with the hope of drawing into the whole the entirety of the
Sunnis in the Arab world...drawing them into their jihadist army...an
army united in the qur'an dictated mission of killing us all.
And how does Obama fit into this beyond his allowing for ISIS'
birth...what is critical to his involvement is to know exactly who this
man is. First, Obama is what's known in some muslim circles as a
'cultural muslim'...a muslim who might not outwardly practice the faith
but a muslim whose sympathies and actions against Israel, and
specifically its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, shows his loyalties
lie with those in the islamic world who see themselves locked in a
self-perceived life and death battle against the Jewish State.
And while
it can be rightly assumed that Obama is no Christian as he has never
attended a Christian church service since becoming president but has
made sure to celebrate Ramadan with members of his staff and
Congress...and along with his vile words against Christianity at this
year's National Prayer Breakfast there exists no record of his
converting. Remember, Obama's being a muslim can be proven by not only
his Indonesian school records listing his faith as 'islam' for if he was
not a muslim he could not have attended the madrasa school he did attend, but
also by his many slips when being interviewed where for example he
said, “my muslim faith.” And if somewhere there is a record of his
converting that would mean that under islamic law he would be a 'murtadd'
(apostate), an ex-muslim converted to another religion who must be
executed.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.