If Hillary can escape Perjury charges for lying to congress (which I am sure she will), then I bet she would love to run against Christie, whom would rather spend time being wined and dined by the Clintons than standing for any conservative principles. He even headlined next to Hillary at this year's Clinton global initiative summit.
The fact that the media is already starting to spin this guy as some sort of Reagan Republican Conservative Jesus is particularly galling to me.
If Hillary can escape Perjury charges for lying to congress (which I am sure she will), then I bet she would love to run against Christie, whom would rather spend time being wined and dined by the Clintons than standing for any conservative principles. He even headlined next to Hillary at this year's Clinton global initiative summit.
The fact that the media is already starting to spin this guy as some sort of Reagan Republican Conservative Jesus is particularly galling to me.
"I don’t know what the cost is, and quite frankly, I don't care,"
Christie said at a press conference in response to those criticisms.
"We’re not going to be penny wise and pound foolish around here."
of course, you could attribute that quote to pretty much any republican or democrat these days.
"I don’t know what the cost is, and quite frankly, I don't care,"
Christie said at a press conference in response to those criticisms.
"We’re not going to be penny wise and pound foolish around here."
of course, you could attribute that quote to pretty much any republican or democrat these days.
Yeah cuz I'm the one who is on the fringe of reality right?
and the world actually is still flat...
Rape doesn't cause pregnancy...
and on and on and on....
appreciate the laugh though, its Friday afterall
Yes, when you attribute negative aspects of the worst of a group to an individual (regardless of their beliefs, history etc), you are using stereotypes.
Yeah cuz I'm the one who is on the fringe of reality right?
and the world actually is still flat...
Rape doesn't cause pregnancy...
and on and on and on....
appreciate the laugh though, its Friday afterall
Yes, when you attribute negative aspects of the worst of a group to an individual (regardless of their beliefs, history etc), you are using stereotypes.
rick, just so i know, what's wrong with christie? the garbage i posted just shows he's a liberal spender, but who isn't. what else is there?
I cant say I don't agree with you, but I am done voting for gun grabbing dishonest political chameleons that demagogue real issues then turn around and break the public trust.
I have gotten fairly active in local and state politics and am attempting to rally support behind individuals I am proud to vote for. I know some people think it is radical and crazy to not want to support known liars and thieves, and believe I am throwing away my vote.
at the end of the day it is my right.
But honestly, learning to get along with people you disagree with is a necessary part of growing up.
rick, just so i know, what's wrong with christie? the garbage i posted just shows he's a liberal spender, but who isn't. what else is there?
I cant say I don't agree with you, but I am done voting for gun grabbing dishonest political chameleons that demagogue real issues then turn around and break the public trust.
I have gotten fairly active in local and state politics and am attempting to rally support behind individuals I am proud to vote for. I know some people think it is radical and crazy to not want to support known liars and thieves, and believe I am throwing away my vote.
at the end of the day it is my right.
But honestly, learning to get along with people you disagree with is a necessary part of growing up.
i'm not in favor of most gun laws, but those don't sound terrible.
So you are in favor of arbitrary lists, that have no judicial oversight (no oversight at all), that are not disclosed to anyone, and take away the Constitutional right to bear arms?
Who even makes these lists (nobody knows).
Christie is no different than W or Obama. He would be a disaster for this country.
i'm not in favor of most gun laws, but those don't sound terrible.
So you are in favor of arbitrary lists, that have no judicial oversight (no oversight at all), that are not disclosed to anyone, and take away the Constitutional right to bear arms?
Who even makes these lists (nobody knows).
Christie is no different than W or Obama. He would be a disaster for this country.
Yes, when you attribute negative aspects of the worst of a group to an individual (regardless of their beliefs, history etc), you are using stereotypes.
You are coming off as quite the bigot.
First off, fair enough, and I apologize
But,
My attitude and condescension stems from the very simple fact that I want to win an election in the next 25 years. And the tea party is making that impossible. The failure to see that leaves many like me wondering just how sound of mind the TP really is.
The reality is the GOP would control the senate right now if it wasn't for the TP. Do I really need to explain this further? You are a bright guy so I'll just leave it at that.
Yes, when you attribute negative aspects of the worst of a group to an individual (regardless of their beliefs, history etc), you are using stereotypes.
You are coming off as quite the bigot.
First off, fair enough, and I apologize
But,
My attitude and condescension stems from the very simple fact that I want to win an election in the next 25 years. And the tea party is making that impossible. The failure to see that leaves many like me wondering just how sound of mind the TP really is.
The reality is the GOP would control the senate right now if it wasn't for the TP. Do I really need to explain this further? You are a bright guy so I'll just leave it at that.
My attitude and condescension stems from the very simple fact that I want to win an election in the next 25 years. And the tea party is making that impossible. The failure to see that leaves many like me wondering just how sound of mind the TP really is.
The reality is the GOP would control the senate right now if it wasn't for the TP. Do I really need to explain this further? You are a bright guy so I'll just leave it at that.
Apology accepted.
I just can't sit by and watch the GOP put up another completely beatable, unlikable big govt. Big spending, Big surveillance, police state loving turd like Christie.
What is the point of conservative leadership that compromises every aspect of the Constitution.
The GOP is learning that they can't count on the "young" conservative crowd anymore. I think the Tea Party has been demonized and suffered a lot of self inflicted wounds (palin, bachmania etc), but the GOP could never fully co-opt the Tea Party base, which is largely comprised of Libertarian leaning Conservatives.
This is the growing future of the Republican party. I agree with slowly weaning off of the religious anti science sect of the evangelist wing of the Republican party, but it is impossible to cut them off. It is not like the Republican party is going to turn around and get any share of the black vote. It is not like they are going to carry California or New York.
It is a sad truth that these are voices that will be heard, and catered to in many ways, but I think that the tradeoff is much better with a candidate like Rand Paul who has a strong belief in the Constitution.
My attitude and condescension stems from the very simple fact that I want to win an election in the next 25 years. And the tea party is making that impossible. The failure to see that leaves many like me wondering just how sound of mind the TP really is.
The reality is the GOP would control the senate right now if it wasn't for the TP. Do I really need to explain this further? You are a bright guy so I'll just leave it at that.
Apology accepted.
I just can't sit by and watch the GOP put up another completely beatable, unlikable big govt. Big spending, Big surveillance, police state loving turd like Christie.
What is the point of conservative leadership that compromises every aspect of the Constitution.
The GOP is learning that they can't count on the "young" conservative crowd anymore. I think the Tea Party has been demonized and suffered a lot of self inflicted wounds (palin, bachmania etc), but the GOP could never fully co-opt the Tea Party base, which is largely comprised of Libertarian leaning Conservatives.
This is the growing future of the Republican party. I agree with slowly weaning off of the religious anti science sect of the evangelist wing of the Republican party, but it is impossible to cut them off. It is not like the Republican party is going to turn around and get any share of the black vote. It is not like they are going to carry California or New York.
It is a sad truth that these are voices that will be heard, and catered to in many ways, but I think that the tradeoff is much better with a candidate like Rand Paul who has a strong belief in the Constitution.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.